Firearm Injuries: Unveiling the Unmatched Healthcare Burden and Costs.

Colleen P Nofi, Emma Cornell, Bailey K Roberts, Rafael Klein-Cloud, Thevaa Chandereng, Arjun Sondhi, Codruta Chiuzan, Chethan Sathya
{"title":"Firearm Injuries: Unveiling the Unmatched Healthcare Burden and Costs.","authors":"Colleen P Nofi, Emma Cornell, Bailey K Roberts, Rafael Klein-Cloud, Thevaa Chandereng, Arjun Sondhi, Codruta Chiuzan, Chethan Sathya","doi":"10.1097/AS9.0000000000000590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate hospital resource utilization in the treatment of firearm-related injuries compared to other penetrating and blunt traumas.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with firearm injuries becoming the leading cause of pediatric death as of 2020. Despite the known mortality, the burden of inpatient healthcare for initially nonfatal firearm injuries is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of the National Inpatient Sample was performed. The study population included patients with firearm injuries, penetrating traumas, and blunt traumas from 2017 to 2021. Primary interventions assessed included surgical procedures performed during hospitalization, and the outcomes evaluated were costs, length of stay, and mortality. Comparisons were made between the 3 injury groups (firearm, penetrating trauma, and blunt trauma) across these key variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10,653,446 patients identified, 243,295 (2.3%) had a firearm injury, 287,110 (2.7%) had a penetrating injury, and 10,123,041 (95%) had blunt trauma. Patients sustaining firearm injuries required more resuscitative interventions and major surgical procedures, such as pericardiotomy, chest tube placement, exploratory thoracotomy, and laparotomy. The mean length of inpatient stay was longer for firearm injuries (7.8 days) compared with penetrating (5.7 days) and blunt trauma (6.0 days, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Inpatient death rates were higher for firearm injuries (6.5%) compared with penetrating (0.6%) and blunt trauma (2.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Total hospital costs were higher for firearm injuries ($30,529) compared with penetrating ($12,243) and blunt trauma ($18,333, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Firearm injuries remained a significant predictor of higher hospital costs, even after adjusting for other factors (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.256; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although firearm injuries account for only a proportion of total trauma cases, they are associated with higher inpatient resource utilization, as measured by interventions and hospital costs. These findings highlight the need for focused prevention efforts and resource allocation to address unique challenges posed by firearm injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":72231,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","volume":"6 3","pages":"e590"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate hospital resource utilization in the treatment of firearm-related injuries compared to other penetrating and blunt traumas.

Background: Trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with firearm injuries becoming the leading cause of pediatric death as of 2020. Despite the known mortality, the burden of inpatient healthcare for initially nonfatal firearm injuries is poorly understood.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of the National Inpatient Sample was performed. The study population included patients with firearm injuries, penetrating traumas, and blunt traumas from 2017 to 2021. Primary interventions assessed included surgical procedures performed during hospitalization, and the outcomes evaluated were costs, length of stay, and mortality. Comparisons were made between the 3 injury groups (firearm, penetrating trauma, and blunt trauma) across these key variables.

Results: Among 10,653,446 patients identified, 243,295 (2.3%) had a firearm injury, 287,110 (2.7%) had a penetrating injury, and 10,123,041 (95%) had blunt trauma. Patients sustaining firearm injuries required more resuscitative interventions and major surgical procedures, such as pericardiotomy, chest tube placement, exploratory thoracotomy, and laparotomy. The mean length of inpatient stay was longer for firearm injuries (7.8 days) compared with penetrating (5.7 days) and blunt trauma (6.0 days, P < 0.001). Inpatient death rates were higher for firearm injuries (6.5%) compared with penetrating (0.6%) and blunt trauma (2.8%, P < 0.001). Total hospital costs were higher for firearm injuries ($30,529) compared with penetrating ($12,243) and blunt trauma ($18,333, P < 0.001). Firearm injuries remained a significant predictor of higher hospital costs, even after adjusting for other factors (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.256; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Although firearm injuries account for only a proportion of total trauma cases, they are associated with higher inpatient resource utilization, as measured by interventions and hospital costs. These findings highlight the need for focused prevention efforts and resource allocation to address unique challenges posed by firearm injuries.

Abstract Image

枪支伤害:揭露无与伦比的医疗负担和成本。
目的:对比其他穿透性和钝性创伤,评价医院在火器伤治疗中的资源利用情况。背景:创伤是美国发病率和死亡率的主要原因,截至2020年,枪支伤害成为儿童死亡的主要原因。尽管已知死亡率,但对最初非致命火器伤害的住院医疗负担了解甚少。方法:对全国住院患者样本进行回顾性队列研究。研究人群包括2017年至2021年的火器伤、穿透性创伤和钝性创伤患者。评估的主要干预措施包括住院期间进行的外科手术,评估的结果包括费用、住院时间和死亡率。比较三个损伤组(火器伤、穿透伤和钝性伤)在这些关键变量上的差异。结果:在10,653,446例患者中,243,295例(2.3%)为火器伤,287,110例(2.7%)为穿透伤,10,123,041例(95%)为钝性创伤。枪伤患者需要更多的复苏干预和主要的外科手术,如心包切开术、胸管置入、探查性开胸术和剖腹手术。火器伤的平均住院时间(7.8天)比穿透伤(5.7天)和钝器伤(6.0天,P < 0.001)更长。火器伤的住院死亡率(6.5%)高于穿透伤(0.6%)和钝器伤(2.8%,P < 0.001)。火器伤的总住院费用(30,529美元)高于穿透伤(12,243美元)和钝性创伤(18,333美元,P < 0.001)。即使在调整了其他因素后(调整后的发病率比为1.256;P < 0.001),火器伤害仍然是较高住院费用的重要预测因子。结论:尽管火器伤害仅占总创伤病例的一部分,但通过干预措施和医院费用来衡量,火器伤害与较高的住院资源利用率有关。这些发现突出了集中预防工作和资源分配的必要性,以解决枪支伤害带来的独特挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信