From Rapid Manufacturing to Clinical Use: A Retrospective Observational Study of an Emergency Ventilator During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lenka Horakova, Vaclav Ort, Ladislav Bis, Simon Walzel, Karel Roubik
{"title":"From Rapid Manufacturing to Clinical Use: A Retrospective Observational Study of an Emergency Ventilator During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Lenka Horakova, Vaclav Ort, Ladislav Bis, Simon Walzel, Karel Roubik","doi":"10.1017/dmp.2025.10194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic spurred efforts to develop emergency ventilators, though few progressed beyond laboratory testing. This study evaluates CoroVent, a rapidly manufactured ventilator, during real-life deployment in critically ill COVID-19 patients amid ventilator shortages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients ventilated with emergency ventilator CoroVent. This device uses a novel and unique way of generating inspiratory flow and gas mixing using fast ON/OFF valves for air and oxygen, producing pneumatic pulses that are then smoothed into continuous flow. Clinical data were collected from 3 hospitals between October 2020 and March 2021, selected from 27 contacted, of which 23 responded and 4 reported clinical use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight male patients (mean age 67 years, BMI 37.2 kg·m<sup>-2</sup>) with COVID-19 or suspected infection were ventilated with CoroVent for 31.3 (10.0-58.5) hours. The mean FiO<sub>2</sub> was 71.4%, PEEP 10.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and Vt 8.9 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup> predicted body weight. CoroVent was used as an initial or replacement ventilator during device shortages. No major technical failures occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report of real-life clinical use of a rapidly manufactured emergency ventilator during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results confirm that such devices, if well-designed, can provide effective respiratory support when conventional ventilators are unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":54390,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","volume":"19 ","pages":"e271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.10194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic spurred efforts to develop emergency ventilators, though few progressed beyond laboratory testing. This study evaluates CoroVent, a rapidly manufactured ventilator, during real-life deployment in critically ill COVID-19 patients amid ventilator shortages.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients ventilated with emergency ventilator CoroVent. This device uses a novel and unique way of generating inspiratory flow and gas mixing using fast ON/OFF valves for air and oxygen, producing pneumatic pulses that are then smoothed into continuous flow. Clinical data were collected from 3 hospitals between October 2020 and March 2021, selected from 27 contacted, of which 23 responded and 4 reported clinical use.

Results: Eight male patients (mean age 67 years, BMI 37.2 kg·m-2) with COVID-19 or suspected infection were ventilated with CoroVent for 31.3 (10.0-58.5) hours. The mean FiO2 was 71.4%, PEEP 10.6 cmH2O, and Vt 8.9 mL·kg-1 predicted body weight. CoroVent was used as an initial or replacement ventilator during device shortages. No major technical failures occurred.

Conclusions: This is the first report of real-life clinical use of a rapidly manufactured emergency ventilator during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results confirm that such devices, if well-designed, can provide effective respiratory support when conventional ventilators are unavailable.

从快速制造到临床使用:COVID-19大流行期间紧急呼吸机的回顾性观察研究
目的:COVID-19大流行促使人们努力开发紧急呼吸机,尽管很少有超出实验室测试的进展。本研究评估了在呼吸机短缺的情况下,快速生产的CoroVent呼吸机在COVID-19危重患者中的实际部署情况。方法:本回顾性观察研究纳入了使用紧急呼吸机CoroVent进行通气的患者。该装置采用一种新颖独特的方式产生吸气流和气体混合,使用快速的空气和氧气开关阀,产生气动脉冲,然后平滑成连续流动。在2020年10月至2021年3月期间从3家医院收集临床数据,从27家接触者中选择,其中23家回应,4家报告临床使用。结果:8例新冠肺炎或疑似感染的男性患者(平均年龄67岁,BMI 37.2 kg·m-2)经科罗芬通气31.3(10.0 ~ 58.5)小时。平均FiO2为71.4%,PEEP为10.6 cmH2O, Vt为8.9 mL·kg-1预测体重。在设备短缺时,CoroVent被用作初始或替代呼吸机。无重大技术故障。结论:这是2019冠状病毒病大流行期间首次报道临床实际使用快速制造的紧急呼吸机。结果证实,如果设计良好,这种设备可以在常规呼吸机不可用时提供有效的呼吸支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is the first comprehensive and authoritative journal emphasizing public health preparedness and disaster response for all health care and public health professionals globally. The journal seeks to translate science into practice and integrate medical and public health perspectives. With the events of September 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the tsunami in Indonesia, hurricane Katrina, SARS and the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, all health care and public health professionals must be prepared to respond to emergency situations. In support of these pressing public health needs, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness is committed to the medical and public health communities who are the stewards of the health and security of citizens worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信