Understanding Clinical Decision Support Failures in Pediatric Intensive Care Units via Applied Systems Safety Engineering and Human Factors Problem Analysis: Insights From the DISCOVER Learning Lab.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001358
Matthew Zackoff, Anabel Graciela, Kelly Collins, Daniel Loeb, Andrea Meisman, Kyesha James, Jose Generoso, Karina Ortega, Bain Butcher, Christina Cifra, Colleen Badke, Maya Dewan
{"title":"Understanding Clinical Decision Support Failures in Pediatric Intensive Care Units via Applied Systems Safety Engineering and Human Factors Problem Analysis: Insights From the DISCOVER Learning Lab.","authors":"Matthew Zackoff, Anabel Graciela, Kelly Collins, Daniel Loeb, Andrea Meisman, Kyesha James, Jose Generoso, Karina Ortega, Bain Butcher, Christina Cifra, Colleen Badke, Maya Dewan","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Children receiving care in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are vulnerable to decompensation and diagnostic error due to the complex and dynamic nature of pediatric critical illness. In the PICU, the few clinical decision support (CDS) tools that have been implemented to support diagnostic accuracy (i.e., the ability to detect the presence of a condition) have not led to an increase in clinician adoption of desired practices nor demonstrated clear clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DISCOVER Learning Lab analyzed workflow and failure modes in diagnosing and managing clinical decompensation in the PICU, using systems safety engineering and human factors to examine intersections with established CDS. Methods employed included qualitative interviews, workflow mapping, immersive virtual reality (VR) systems testing via a digital twin environment, and a failure modes effect analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workflow mapping and qualitative interviews revealed barriers to communication, workflow inefficiencies, and limited access to up-to-date clinical information during critical events in the PICU. The immersive VR systems testing elucidated how PICU staff members currently interact with CDS tools and how various tools could better integrate into or influence clinical workflows. Critical failure modes were identified with corresponding opportunity areas for intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of a systems safety engineering and human factors approach to problem analysis, partnered with novel use of immersive VR and digital twin technology, led to valuable insights into common failure modes and potential opportunity areas to improve diagnostic accuracy and care delivery in a quaternary referral center PICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"21 7Supp","pages":"S21-S28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001358","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Children receiving care in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are vulnerable to decompensation and diagnostic error due to the complex and dynamic nature of pediatric critical illness. In the PICU, the few clinical decision support (CDS) tools that have been implemented to support diagnostic accuracy (i.e., the ability to detect the presence of a condition) have not led to an increase in clinician adoption of desired practices nor demonstrated clear clinical benefit.

Methods: The DISCOVER Learning Lab analyzed workflow and failure modes in diagnosing and managing clinical decompensation in the PICU, using systems safety engineering and human factors to examine intersections with established CDS. Methods employed included qualitative interviews, workflow mapping, immersive virtual reality (VR) systems testing via a digital twin environment, and a failure modes effect analysis.

Results: Workflow mapping and qualitative interviews revealed barriers to communication, workflow inefficiencies, and limited access to up-to-date clinical information during critical events in the PICU. The immersive VR systems testing elucidated how PICU staff members currently interact with CDS tools and how various tools could better integrate into or influence clinical workflows. Critical failure modes were identified with corresponding opportunity areas for intervention.

Conclusions: The application of a systems safety engineering and human factors approach to problem analysis, partnered with novel use of immersive VR and digital twin technology, led to valuable insights into common failure modes and potential opportunity areas to improve diagnostic accuracy and care delivery in a quaternary referral center PICU.

通过应用系统安全工程和人为因素问题分析了解儿科重症监护病房的临床决策支持失败:来自DISCOVER学习实验室的见解。
目的:由于儿科危重症的复杂性和动态性,在儿科重症监护病房(picu)接受治疗的儿童容易出现代偿失调和诊断错误。在PICU中,少数临床决策支持(CDS)工具已被实施,以支持诊断准确性(即,检测疾病存在的能力),但并未导致临床医生采用所需做法的增加,也未显示出明确的临床益处。方法:DISCOVER学习实验室分析PICU临床失代偿诊断和管理的工作流程和失效模式,使用系统安全工程和人为因素来检查与已建立的CDS的交叉点。采用的方法包括定性访谈、工作流映射、通过数字孪生环境进行沉浸式虚拟现实(VR)系统测试以及故障模式影响分析。结果:工作流程映射和定性访谈揭示了PICU关键事件期间沟通障碍、工作流程效率低下和获取最新临床信息受限。沉浸式VR系统测试阐明了PICU工作人员目前如何与CDS工具进行交互,以及各种工具如何更好地集成到临床工作流程中或影响临床工作流程。确定了关键失效模式和相应的干预机会区域。结论:将系统安全工程和人为因素方法应用于问题分析,并结合沉浸式VR和数字孪生技术的新应用,对常见故障模式和潜在机会领域产生了有价值的见解,从而提高了四级转诊中心PICU的诊断准确性和护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信