Improving Telehealth Transition of Care Programs Focused on Readmission Reduction.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001367
Patricia Spaar, Garrett Zabala, Ryan E Anderson, Ethan Booker, Raj M Ratwani, Seth A Krevat
{"title":"Improving Telehealth Transition of Care Programs Focused on Readmission Reduction.","authors":"Patricia Spaar, Garrett Zabala, Ryan E Anderson, Ethan Booker, Raj M Ratwani, Seth A Krevat","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Suboptimal transitional care from the hospital to home can result in poor health outcomes, increased costs, and readmissions. Telehealth-based transitional care programs have shown some improvements in readmission rates; however, it is unclear why some patients benefit while others do not. This study evaluated a connected transitional care (CTC) program that provided high-risk patients with timely post-discharge telehealth appointments conducted by a nurse practitioner. Our focus was on understanding why some patients participating in the program benefit and are not readmitted while others are readmitted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed readmission rates for patients referred to the program and compared those who engaged, by completing a telehealth visit, to those who did not. For those patients who did engage, we conducted chart reviews of a subset of patients who were not readmitted compared with those who were readmitted to extract themes and understand differences that could serve to improve the CTC program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1374 patients referred to the CTC program, 443 (32.2%) engaged by completing a telehealth visit. Those who engaged in the program had a readmission rate of 18.7% compared with 21.3% for those who did not, resulting in a relative risk reduction of 12%. Chart reviews comparing patients who engaged and were not readmitted (32 charts reviewed) with those who were readmitted (18 charts reviewed) revealed several differences. Patients who were not readmitted were seen sooner after discharge, had greater family/caregiver involvement, had social needs addressed, required less language interpretation, and had fewer instances of altered mental status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that a telehealth transition program may reduce readmissions, although a more rigorous statistical analysis is needed. Importantly, the qualitative chart review suggests several areas for improvement, including engaging family/caregivers, providing better social need support, and developing ways to support behavioral health.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"21 7Supp","pages":"S60-S64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Suboptimal transitional care from the hospital to home can result in poor health outcomes, increased costs, and readmissions. Telehealth-based transitional care programs have shown some improvements in readmission rates; however, it is unclear why some patients benefit while others do not. This study evaluated a connected transitional care (CTC) program that provided high-risk patients with timely post-discharge telehealth appointments conducted by a nurse practitioner. Our focus was on understanding why some patients participating in the program benefit and are not readmitted while others are readmitted.

Methods: We analyzed readmission rates for patients referred to the program and compared those who engaged, by completing a telehealth visit, to those who did not. For those patients who did engage, we conducted chart reviews of a subset of patients who were not readmitted compared with those who were readmitted to extract themes and understand differences that could serve to improve the CTC program.

Results: Of 1374 patients referred to the CTC program, 443 (32.2%) engaged by completing a telehealth visit. Those who engaged in the program had a readmission rate of 18.7% compared with 21.3% for those who did not, resulting in a relative risk reduction of 12%. Chart reviews comparing patients who engaged and were not readmitted (32 charts reviewed) with those who were readmitted (18 charts reviewed) revealed several differences. Patients who were not readmitted were seen sooner after discharge, had greater family/caregiver involvement, had social needs addressed, required less language interpretation, and had fewer instances of altered mental status.

Conclusions: This study suggests that a telehealth transition program may reduce readmissions, although a more rigorous statistical analysis is needed. Importantly, the qualitative chart review suggests several areas for improvement, including engaging family/caregivers, providing better social need support, and developing ways to support behavioral health.

改善远程医疗过渡的护理方案,重点是减少再入院。
从医院到家庭的次优过渡护理可能导致健康状况不佳、费用增加和再入院。基于远程医疗的过渡护理方案在再入院率方面有所改善;然而,尚不清楚为什么有些患者受益,而另一些患者却没有。本研究评估了一个连接的过渡护理(CTC)项目,该项目为高风险患者提供出院后及时的远程医疗预约,由执业护士进行。我们的重点是理解为什么一些参与该项目的患者受益而没有再次入院,而另一些则再次入院。方法:我们分析了转介到该计划的患者的再入院率,并比较了那些通过完成远程医疗访问参与的患者和那些没有参与的患者。对于那些参与治疗的患者,我们对未再次入院的患者与再次入院的患者进行了图表回顾,以提取主题并了解可能有助于改进CTC计划的差异。结果:在1374名患者中,443名(32.2%)通过完成远程医疗访问参与了CTC计划。参与该项目的患者再入院率为18.7%,而未参与该项目的患者再入院率为21.3%,相对风险降低了12%。图表回顾比较了参与和未再入院的患者(回顾了32张图表)与再次入院的患者(回顾了18张图表),发现了一些差异。没有再次入院的患者出院后更早被看到,有更多的家庭/照顾者参与,社会需求得到解决,需要更少的语言解释,精神状态改变的情况也更少。结论:这项研究表明,远程医疗过渡计划可能会减少再入院,尽管需要更严格的统计分析。重要的是,定性图表回顾提出了几个需要改进的领域,包括吸引家庭/照顾者,提供更好的社会需求支持,以及开发支持行为健康的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信