Clinician Communication and Patient Safety in Pediatrics: A Practical Application of Human-Centered Design for Problem Identification and Analysis.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001403
Halley Ruppel, Brooke Luo, James Won, Christopher P Bonafide, Kimberly Albanowski, Austin DeChalus, Brianna Reed, Amina N Khan, Alexis Z Tomlinson, Andi Fu, Jess Ettore, Marion Leary
{"title":"Clinician Communication and Patient Safety in Pediatrics: A Practical Application of Human-Centered Design for Problem Identification and Analysis.","authors":"Halley Ruppel, Brooke Luo, James Won, Christopher P Bonafide, Kimberly Albanowski, Austin DeChalus, Brianna Reed, Amina N Khan, Alexis Z Tomlinson, Andi Fu, Jess Ettore, Marion Leary","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We established a Patient Safety Learning Lab (AHRQ R18HS029473) to examine the sociotechnical system that drives interprofessional communication in pediatric inpatient settings in the context of evolving communication technologies, and to co-create and evaluate solutions with clinician end users. Here, we describe the use of human-centered design and system engineering processes for the Problem Analysis phase of this project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the \"Empathize\" and \"Define\" steps of the design thinking process to our Problem Analysis. The goal of the Empathize step is to generate a comprehensive understanding of a problem(s) as experienced by the end user. We conducted interviews and observations with interprofessional clinicians from pediatric inpatient units in a single children's hospital. We used other operational and clinical data to triangulate findings (clinician secure messaging metadata, survey data, and policies/procedures). In the \"Define\" step, we iteratively developed user-centered problem statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data synthesized for the problem analysis included: interviews with 28 clinicians, 32 hours of unit observations; metadata for 433,432 secure messages; 155 free-text clinician survey responses; and 40 communication-related policies/procedures. The Problem Analysis revealed communication challenges in the following domains for clinicians providing frontline care (i.e., bedside nurses, residents, frontline fellows): (1) efficiently locating and contacting other members of the care team; (2) communicating urgency level of information; and (3) managing high volume of minimally informative messages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Practical application of human-centered design and systems thinking contributed to a more holistic understanding of communication challenges, and their patient safety implications, from the perspective of multiple end-user groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"21 7Supp","pages":"S89-S95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We established a Patient Safety Learning Lab (AHRQ R18HS029473) to examine the sociotechnical system that drives interprofessional communication in pediatric inpatient settings in the context of evolving communication technologies, and to co-create and evaluate solutions with clinician end users. Here, we describe the use of human-centered design and system engineering processes for the Problem Analysis phase of this project.

Methods: We applied the "Empathize" and "Define" steps of the design thinking process to our Problem Analysis. The goal of the Empathize step is to generate a comprehensive understanding of a problem(s) as experienced by the end user. We conducted interviews and observations with interprofessional clinicians from pediatric inpatient units in a single children's hospital. We used other operational and clinical data to triangulate findings (clinician secure messaging metadata, survey data, and policies/procedures). In the "Define" step, we iteratively developed user-centered problem statements.

Results: Data synthesized for the problem analysis included: interviews with 28 clinicians, 32 hours of unit observations; metadata for 433,432 secure messages; 155 free-text clinician survey responses; and 40 communication-related policies/procedures. The Problem Analysis revealed communication challenges in the following domains for clinicians providing frontline care (i.e., bedside nurses, residents, frontline fellows): (1) efficiently locating and contacting other members of the care team; (2) communicating urgency level of information; and (3) managing high volume of minimally informative messages.

Conclusions: Practical application of human-centered design and systems thinking contributed to a more holistic understanding of communication challenges, and their patient safety implications, from the perspective of multiple end-user groups.

儿科临床医师沟通与患者安全:以人为本的问题识别与分析设计的实际应用。
背景:我们建立了一个患者安全学习实验室(AHRQ R18HS029473),以研究在不断发展的通信技术背景下,推动儿科住院环境中跨专业沟通的社会技术系统,并与临床医生最终用户共同创造和评估解决方案。在这里,我们描述了在这个项目的问题分析阶段使用以人为中心的设计和系统工程过程。方法:我们将设计思维过程中的“共情”和“定义”步骤应用到问题分析中。移情步骤的目标是生成对最终用户所经历的问题的全面理解。我们对一家儿童医院儿科住院病房的跨专业临床医生进行了访谈和观察。我们使用其他操作和临床数据(临床医生安全消息元数据、调查数据和政策/程序)对结果进行三角测量。在“定义”步骤中,我们迭代地开发以用户为中心的问题陈述。结果:问题分析的综合数据包括:与28名临床医生的访谈,32小时的单位观察;433,432条安全消息的元数据;155份自由文本临床医生调查答复;以及40项与沟通有关的政策/程序。问题分析揭示了提供一线护理的临床医生(即床边护士、住院医生、一线研究员)在以下领域面临的沟通挑战:(1)有效地定位和联系护理团队的其他成员;(2)沟通信息的紧急程度;(3)管理大量信息最少的消息。结论:从多个终端用户群体的角度来看,以人为本的设计和系统思维的实际应用有助于更全面地理解沟通挑战及其对患者安全的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信