Challenges and Opportunities in the Medication Reconciliation Process in an Emergency Department: An Observational Human Factors Study.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001362
Huei-Yen Winnie Chen, Connor Wurst, Tahleen A Lattimer, Noni Setiowati, Ann Bisantz, Robert G Wahler, David M Jacobs, Sharon Hewner, Jennifer Stoll, Sabrina Casucci, Ranjit Singh
{"title":"Challenges and Opportunities in the Medication Reconciliation Process in an Emergency Department: An Observational Human Factors Study.","authors":"Huei-Yen Winnie Chen, Connor Wurst, Tahleen A Lattimer, Noni Setiowati, Ann Bisantz, Robert G Wahler, David M Jacobs, Sharon Hewner, Jennifer Stoll, Sabrina Casucci, Ranjit Singh","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This observational study examines challenges and opportunities in the medication reconciliation process within the emergency department (ED). Through a human factors approach, we look to identify barriers and potential improvements for enhancing patient safety during transitions of care for older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted in the ED of a large teaching hospital, comprising 32 hours of observation across 12 sessions. Researchers followed pharmacists, nurses, and triage staff, documenting workflows, communication practices, and medication reconciliation processes. Recurring patterns, challenges, and opportunities for improvement were identified through a qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systemic barriers to effective medication reconciliation were identified, including fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and usability issues in electronic health records. Challenges were exacerbated by the fast-paced ED environment and frequent interruptions. Pharmacists played a pivotal role in synthesizing diverse information sources to construct accurate medication histories, but their workload often limited their capacity to address broader medication safety concerns. Opportunities for improvement include delegating specific tasks to trained support staff, optimizing electronic health record functionalities, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to streamline workflows and reduce errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medication reconciliation in the ED is critical for patient safety but faces significant systemic and environmental challenges. Addressing these barriers through enhanced system integration, task delegation, and improved communication protocols could increase efficiency and reduce errors. Further research is needed to evaluate these interventions across diverse ED settings to optimize medication reconciliation processes and improve safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"21 7Supp","pages":"S7-S11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This observational study examines challenges and opportunities in the medication reconciliation process within the emergency department (ED). Through a human factors approach, we look to identify barriers and potential improvements for enhancing patient safety during transitions of care for older adults.

Methods: An observational study was conducted in the ED of a large teaching hospital, comprising 32 hours of observation across 12 sessions. Researchers followed pharmacists, nurses, and triage staff, documenting workflows, communication practices, and medication reconciliation processes. Recurring patterns, challenges, and opportunities for improvement were identified through a qualitative analysis.

Results: Systemic barriers to effective medication reconciliation were identified, including fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and usability issues in electronic health records. Challenges were exacerbated by the fast-paced ED environment and frequent interruptions. Pharmacists played a pivotal role in synthesizing diverse information sources to construct accurate medication histories, but their workload often limited their capacity to address broader medication safety concerns. Opportunities for improvement include delegating specific tasks to trained support staff, optimizing electronic health record functionalities, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to streamline workflows and reduce errors.

Conclusions: Medication reconciliation in the ED is critical for patient safety but faces significant systemic and environmental challenges. Addressing these barriers through enhanced system integration, task delegation, and improved communication protocols could increase efficiency and reduce errors. Further research is needed to evaluate these interventions across diverse ED settings to optimize medication reconciliation processes and improve safety outcomes.

急诊科药物和解过程中的挑战与机遇:一项观察性人为因素研究。
目的:本观察性研究探讨了急诊科(ED)药物调解过程中的挑战和机遇。通过人为因素方法,我们希望确定障碍和潜在的改进,以提高老年人护理过渡期间的患者安全。方法:在某大型教学医院的急诊科进行了一项观察性研究,包括12次32小时的观察。研究人员跟踪了药剂师、护士和分诊人员,记录了工作流程、沟通实践和药物协调过程。通过定性分析确定了重复出现的模式、挑战和改进机会。结果:确定了有效药物协调的系统性障碍,包括支离破碎的工作流程、不一致的文档和电子健康记录的可用性问题。快节奏的ED环境和频繁的中断加剧了挑战。药剂师在综合各种信息来源以构建准确的用药史方面发挥了关键作用,但他们的工作量往往限制了他们解决更广泛的用药安全问题的能力。改进的机会包括将特定任务委托给训练有素的支持人员,优化电子健康记录功能,以及促进跨学科协作以简化工作流程并减少错误。结论:急诊科的药物调节对患者安全至关重要,但面临着重大的系统和环境挑战。通过增强的系统集成、任务委派和改进的通信协议来解决这些障碍可以提高效率并减少错误。需要进一步的研究来评估不同ED环境下的这些干预措施,以优化药物调节过程并提高安全性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信