"Invert the Pyramid, Let Internists Design the Job as Pilots Do a Cockpit": The Views of General Internal Medicine Physicians on Enhancing Well-Being Through Human Factors Engineering.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001356
Jennifer Zamudio, Qiaoning Zhang, Martha Quinn, Karen E Fowler, Sanjay Saint, Xi Jessie Yang
{"title":"\"Invert the Pyramid, Let Internists Design the Job as Pilots Do a Cockpit\": The Views of General Internal Medicine Physicians on Enhancing Well-Being Through Human Factors Engineering.","authors":"Jennifer Zamudio, Qiaoning Zhang, Martha Quinn, Karen E Fowler, Sanjay Saint, Xi Jessie Yang","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Understanding the protective factors of general internists' well-being helps maintain a resilient health care system. As human factors engineering (HFE) offers promising solutions to the challenges physicians face, it is essential to explore how internists understand the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey focusing on the well-being of general internal medicine physicians was mailed out to a random sample of 1,463 internal medicine physicians using the American Medical Association national database. This study focused on the HFE aspects of the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 655 general internists responded to our survey (44.8% response rate). Out of 632 respondents, more than half (59.5%) believed that HFE has a role in enhancing their well-being as an internist, and roughly one-third (36.1%) were unsure. A qualitative analysis performed for the 176 open-ended responses revealed 15 unique categories, with most internists referencing their benefits for improving leadership quality, developing shared mental models among teams, and optimizing current processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that most internists recognize the potential of HFE to positively impact their well-being, though a substantial portion remain uncertain about its applications and benefits. This highlights a need to conduct systems analyses to identify barriers and facilitators of internists' tasks to design tailored, systemic interventions, such as support from leadership in adaptation, support during patient rounds, and improvements to the EMR system. These systemic improvements in combination with spreading HFE knowledge have the potential to enhance internist well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"21 7Supp","pages":"S36-S42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Understanding the protective factors of general internists' well-being helps maintain a resilient health care system. As human factors engineering (HFE) offers promising solutions to the challenges physicians face, it is essential to explore how internists understand the field.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey focusing on the well-being of general internal medicine physicians was mailed out to a random sample of 1,463 internal medicine physicians using the American Medical Association national database. This study focused on the HFE aspects of the survey.

Results: A total of 655 general internists responded to our survey (44.8% response rate). Out of 632 respondents, more than half (59.5%) believed that HFE has a role in enhancing their well-being as an internist, and roughly one-third (36.1%) were unsure. A qualitative analysis performed for the 176 open-ended responses revealed 15 unique categories, with most internists referencing their benefits for improving leadership quality, developing shared mental models among teams, and optimizing current processes.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that most internists recognize the potential of HFE to positively impact their well-being, though a substantial portion remain uncertain about its applications and benefits. This highlights a need to conduct systems analyses to identify barriers and facilitators of internists' tasks to design tailored, systemic interventions, such as support from leadership in adaptation, support during patient rounds, and improvements to the EMR system. These systemic improvements in combination with spreading HFE knowledge have the potential to enhance internist well-being.

“颠倒金字塔,让内科医生像飞行员做驾驶舱一样设计工作”:普通内科医生对通过人因工程提高幸福感的看法。
目的:了解全科医生健康的保护因素有助于维持一个有弹性的卫生保健系统。由于人为因素工程(HFE)为医生面临的挑战提供了有希望的解决方案,因此探索内科医生如何理解该领域至关重要。方法:通过美国医学协会国家数据库随机抽取1463名内科医生,对普通内科医生的幸福感进行横断面调查。本研究侧重于调查的HFE方面。结果:共有655名全科医师参与调查,回复率为44.8%。在632名受访者中,超过一半(59.5%)的人认为HFE在提高他们作为内科医生的幸福感方面发挥了作用,大约三分之一(36.1%)的人不确定。对176份开放式回答进行的定性分析揭示了15个独特的类别,大多数内科医生提到了他们在提高领导素质、在团队中建立共享的心理模型和优化当前流程方面的好处。结论:我们的研究结果表明,大多数内科医生认识到HFE对他们的健康有积极影响的潜力,尽管很大一部分人对其应用和益处仍不确定。这突出表明需要进行系统分析,以确定内科医生任务的障碍和促进因素,以设计量身定制的系统干预措施,例如领导层在适应方面的支持,患者查房期间的支持以及改进电子病历系统。这些系统改进与传播HFE知识相结合,有可能提高内科医生的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信