Dose reduction in radiotherapy treatment planning CT via deep learning-based reconstruction: a single‑institution study.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Keisuke Yasui, Yuri Kasugai, Maho Morishita, Yasunori Saito, Hidetoshi Shimizu, Haruka Uezono, Naoki Hayashi
{"title":"Dose reduction in radiotherapy treatment planning CT via deep learning-based reconstruction: a single‑institution study.","authors":"Keisuke Yasui, Yuri Kasugai, Maho Morishita, Yasunori Saito, Hidetoshi Shimizu, Haruka Uezono, Naoki Hayashi","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00967-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To quantify radiation dose reduction in radiotherapy treatment-planning CT (RTCT) using a deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR; AiCE) algorithm compared with adaptive iterative dose reduction (IR; AIDR). To evaluate its potential to inform RTCT-specific diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). In this single-institution retrospective study, 4-part RTCT scans (head, head and neck, lung, and pelvis) were acquired on a large-bore CT. Scans reconstructed with IR (n = 820) and DLR (n = 854) were compared. The 75th-percentile CTDI<sub>vol</sub> and DLP (CTDI<sub>IR</sub>, DLP<sub>IR</sub> vs. CTDI<sub>DLR</sub>, DLP<sub>DLR</sub>) were determined per site. Dose reduction rates were calculated as (CTDI<sub>DLR</sub> - CTDI<sub>IR</sub>)/CTDI<sub>IR</sub> × 100% and similarly for DLP. Statistical significance was assessed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. DLR yielded CTDI<sub>vol</sub> reductions of 30.4-75.4% and DLP reductions of 23.1-73.5% across sites (p < 0.001), with the greatest reductions in head and neck RTCT (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>: 75.4%; DLP: 73.5%). Variability also narrowed. Compared with published national DRLs, DLR achieved 34.8 mGy and 18.8 mGy lower CTDI<sub>vol</sub> for head and neck versus UK-DRLs and Japanese multi-institutional data, respectively. DLR substantially lowers RTCT dose indices, providing quantitative data to guide RTCT-specific DRLs and optimize clinical workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00967-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To quantify radiation dose reduction in radiotherapy treatment-planning CT (RTCT) using a deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR; AiCE) algorithm compared with adaptive iterative dose reduction (IR; AIDR). To evaluate its potential to inform RTCT-specific diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). In this single-institution retrospective study, 4-part RTCT scans (head, head and neck, lung, and pelvis) were acquired on a large-bore CT. Scans reconstructed with IR (n = 820) and DLR (n = 854) were compared. The 75th-percentile CTDIvol and DLP (CTDIIR, DLPIR vs. CTDIDLR, DLPDLR) were determined per site. Dose reduction rates were calculated as (CTDIDLR - CTDIIR)/CTDIIR × 100% and similarly for DLP. Statistical significance was assessed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. DLR yielded CTDIvol reductions of 30.4-75.4% and DLP reductions of 23.1-73.5% across sites (p < 0.001), with the greatest reductions in head and neck RTCT (CTDIvol: 75.4%; DLP: 73.5%). Variability also narrowed. Compared with published national DRLs, DLR achieved 34.8 mGy and 18.8 mGy lower CTDIvol for head and neck versus UK-DRLs and Japanese multi-institutional data, respectively. DLR substantially lowers RTCT dose indices, providing quantitative data to guide RTCT-specific DRLs and optimize clinical workflows.

基于深度学习重建的放疗治疗计划CT剂量降低:一项单机构研究。
与自适应迭代剂量减少(IR; AIDR)相比,使用基于深度学习的重建(DLR; AiCE)算法量化放疗治疗计划CT (RTCT)的辐射剂量减少。评估其为rct特异性诊断参考水平(drl)提供信息的潜力。在这项单机构回顾性研究中,在大口径CT上获得了4部分RTCT扫描(头部、头颈、肺部和骨盆)。用IR (n = 820)和DLR (n = 854)重建的扫描结果进行比较。测定每个位点的第75百分位CTDIvol和DLP (CTDIIR、DLPIR vs. CTDIDLR、DLPDLR)。剂量减少率计算为(CTDIDLR - CTDIIR)/CTDIIR × 100%, DLP也类似。采用Mann-Whitney u检验评估统计学显著性。DLR使CTDIvol降低30.4-75.4%,DLP降低23.1-73.5% (p vol: 75.4%, DLP: 73.5%)。变异性也缩小了。与已发表的国家DRLs相比,DLR的头颈部CTDIvol分别比英国DRLs和日本多机构数据低34.8 mGy和18.8 mGy。DLR大大降低了RTCT剂量指标,为指导RTCT特异性drl和优化临床工作流程提供了定量数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信