Development of the "JPCC Barriers to Pediatric Colostomy Care Scoring System": A Modified Delphi Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1002/wjs.70101
Giulia Brisighelli, Catterina Bebington, Marion Arnold, Lindiwe Dyamara, Yentl Gamiet, Leila Hartford, Jane Hoole, Laura Obbes, Juan Scribante
{"title":"Development of the \"JPCC Barriers to Pediatric Colostomy Care Scoring System\": A Modified Delphi Study.","authors":"Giulia Brisighelli, Catterina Bebington, Marion Arnold, Lindiwe Dyamara, Yentl Gamiet, Leila Hartford, Jane Hoole, Laura Obbes, Juan Scribante","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), pediatric colostomy care is associated with significant clinical, social, and economic challenges that negatively impact patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify key barriers to pediatric colostomy care and to develop a scoring system for barriers to colostomy care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi study was conducted, involving caregivers of pediatric patients with colostomies and health care professionals managing such patients in Southern Africa. Forty individuals were invited to participate (20 caregivers and 20 health care professionals). In Round 1, participants were asked to list barriers to colostomy care via an online REDCap survey. Three authors (GB, CB, JS) thematically grouped identified barriers. In Round 2, participants rated the relevance of each statement: ≥ 75% agreement defined consensus. A virtual Round 3 refinement meeting was held with an expert panel to finalize the scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 40 invited individuals, 23 (57.5%) participated in Round 1: 12 health care professionals (9 doctors, 2 nurses, and 1 with an unknown profession) and 11 caregivers. Sixteen participants completed Round 2, with consensus reached on all barrier statements. In Round 3, 4 nurses and 4 doctors reviewed and refined the statements, resulting in a final 36-item JPCC barriers to colostomy care scoring system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents the first scoring system specifically designed to measure barriers to pediatric colostomy care in Southern Africa. The scoring system offers a practical framework for research, clinical assessment, and advocacy. Further multicenter validation is recommended to assess its applicability across diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2819-2827"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), pediatric colostomy care is associated with significant clinical, social, and economic challenges that negatively impact patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify key barriers to pediatric colostomy care and to develop a scoring system for barriers to colostomy care.

Methods: A modified Delphi study was conducted, involving caregivers of pediatric patients with colostomies and health care professionals managing such patients in Southern Africa. Forty individuals were invited to participate (20 caregivers and 20 health care professionals). In Round 1, participants were asked to list barriers to colostomy care via an online REDCap survey. Three authors (GB, CB, JS) thematically grouped identified barriers. In Round 2, participants rated the relevance of each statement: ≥ 75% agreement defined consensus. A virtual Round 3 refinement meeting was held with an expert panel to finalize the scoring system.

Results: Of the 40 invited individuals, 23 (57.5%) participated in Round 1: 12 health care professionals (9 doctors, 2 nurses, and 1 with an unknown profession) and 11 caregivers. Sixteen participants completed Round 2, with consensus reached on all barrier statements. In Round 3, 4 nurses and 4 doctors reviewed and refined the statements, resulting in a final 36-item JPCC barriers to colostomy care scoring system.

Conclusion: This study presents the first scoring system specifically designed to measure barriers to pediatric colostomy care in Southern Africa. The scoring system offers a practical framework for research, clinical assessment, and advocacy. Further multicenter validation is recommended to assess its applicability across diverse settings.

“JPCC儿童结肠造口护理障碍评分系统”的开发:一项修正德尔菲研究。
背景:在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),儿童结肠造口护理与重大的临床、社会和经济挑战相关,这些挑战会对患者的预后产生负面影响。本研究旨在确定儿童结肠造口护理的主要障碍,并制定结肠造口护理障碍的评分系统。方法:进行了一项改进的德尔菲研究,涉及非洲南部结肠造口患儿的护理人员和管理此类患者的卫生保健专业人员。邀请了40个人参加(20名护理人员和20名保健专业人员)。在第一轮中,参与者被要求通过在线REDCap调查列出结肠造口护理的障碍。三位作者(GB, CB, JS)按主题分组确定了障碍。在第2轮中,参与者对每个陈述的相关性进行评分:≥75%的一致定义共识。与专家小组举行了虚拟的第三轮改进会议,以最终确定评分系统。结果:在40名被邀请的个人中,23人(57.5%)参加了第一轮:12名卫生保健专业人员(9名医生,2名护士,1名职业未知)和11名护理人员。16名参与者完成了第二轮,对所有障碍声明达成了共识。在第3轮中,4名护士和4名医生对这些陈述进行了审查和完善,最终形成了一个36项的JPCC结肠造口护理障碍评分系统。结论:本研究提出了第一个专门设计的评分系统来衡量非洲南部儿童结肠造口护理的障碍。该评分系统为研究、临床评估和宣传提供了一个实用的框架。建议进一步进行多中心验证,以评估其在不同设置中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信