Real-world management of achalasia and esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction in Italy: results from a national survey.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Elettra Ugliono, Salvatore Buscemi, Danilo Consalvo, Angelo Iossa, Nicola Tamburini, Graziano Pernazza, Fabrizio Rebecchi
{"title":"Real-world management of achalasia and esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction in Italy: results from a national survey.","authors":"Elettra Ugliono, Salvatore Buscemi, Danilo Consalvo, Angelo Iossa, Nicola Tamburini, Graziano Pernazza, Fabrizio Rebecchi","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02406-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is significant variability in clinical guidelines for achalasia, and precise indications for Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction (EGJOO) are lacking. The recommendations provided in the published literature could be difficult to translate into the clinical practice due to the discrepancy in the available resources. This survey aims to provide insight into the different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches adopted nationwide. An electronic 31-item questionnaire was sent among the members of the Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery of Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies (SICE). A single response from each participating center was required. A total of 46 answers were obtained. The first approach to achalasia was Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication (H-D) in most cases, but there was an increased use of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for subtype III achalasia. Botulin toxin injection (BTX) and PD were reserved for frail, older patients. Surgery was the primary approach for end-stage achalasia, mainly H-D (50.0%), esophagectomy (22.7%), and PD (20.5%). A conclusive diagnosis of EGJOO was managed through PD (32.6%), clinical observation (21.7%), H-D (17.4%), Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) (13.0%), BTX (13.0%) and POEM (2.2%) while an inconclusive EGJOO diagnosis through clinical observation (39.1%), PD (23.9%), H-D (21.7%), PPIs (8.7%) and POEM (6.5%). The suggested timing was 3 months (72.7%) for clinical and 6 months (63.6%) for instrumental follow-up. In case of persistence of symptoms, the preferred treatments were H-D (50.0%) and PD (28.3%). This study provides a real-world snapshot of the management of achalasia and EGJOO in the Italian landscape, showing a wide variability in the clinical practice among the involved centers. A multidisciplinary approach is advisable, and clinical guidelines are warranted to provide shared decisions for the management of these disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02406-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is significant variability in clinical guidelines for achalasia, and precise indications for Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction (EGJOO) are lacking. The recommendations provided in the published literature could be difficult to translate into the clinical practice due to the discrepancy in the available resources. This survey aims to provide insight into the different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches adopted nationwide. An electronic 31-item questionnaire was sent among the members of the Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery of Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies (SICE). A single response from each participating center was required. A total of 46 answers were obtained. The first approach to achalasia was Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication (H-D) in most cases, but there was an increased use of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for subtype III achalasia. Botulin toxin injection (BTX) and PD were reserved for frail, older patients. Surgery was the primary approach for end-stage achalasia, mainly H-D (50.0%), esophagectomy (22.7%), and PD (20.5%). A conclusive diagnosis of EGJOO was managed through PD (32.6%), clinical observation (21.7%), H-D (17.4%), Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) (13.0%), BTX (13.0%) and POEM (2.2%) while an inconclusive EGJOO diagnosis through clinical observation (39.1%), PD (23.9%), H-D (21.7%), PPIs (8.7%) and POEM (6.5%). The suggested timing was 3 months (72.7%) for clinical and 6 months (63.6%) for instrumental follow-up. In case of persistence of symptoms, the preferred treatments were H-D (50.0%) and PD (28.3%). This study provides a real-world snapshot of the management of achalasia and EGJOO in the Italian landscape, showing a wide variability in the clinical practice among the involved centers. A multidisciplinary approach is advisable, and clinical guidelines are warranted to provide shared decisions for the management of these disorders.

意大利贲门失弛缓症和食管胃交界出口梗阻的实际管理:来自一项全国性调查的结果。
贲门失弛缓症的临床指南有很大的差异,而且缺乏食管胃交界流出梗阻(EGJOO)的确切适应症。由于现有资源的差异,在已发表的文献中提供的建议可能难以转化为临床实践。这项调查旨在深入了解全国采用的不同诊断和治疗方法。在意大利内窥镜手术与新技术学会(SICE)成员中发送了一份31项的电子问卷。每个参与中心都需要一个单一的答复。总共得到46个答案。在大多数情况下,贲门失弛缓症的第一种方法是Heller肌切开术加Dor底扩术(H-D),但对于III型贲门失弛缓症,经口内窥镜肌切开术(POEM)的使用越来越多。肉毒杆菌毒素注射(BTX)和PD保留给虚弱的老年患者。手术是终末期贲门失弛缓症的主要治疗方法,主要是H-D(50.0%)、食管切除术(22.7%)和PD(20.5%)。通过PD(32.6%)、临床观察(21.7%)、H-D(17.4%)、质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)(13.0%)、BTX(13.0%)和POEM(2.2%)确诊EGJOO,而通过临床观察(39.1%)、PD(23.9%)、H-D(21.7%)、ppi(8.7%)和POEM(6.5%)确诊EGJOO。建议临床随访时间为3个月(72.7%),仪器随访时间为6个月(63.6%)。如果症状持续存在,首选的治疗方法是H-D(50.0%)和PD(28.3%)。本研究提供了意大利失弛缓症和EGJOO管理的真实世界快照,显示了在相关中心的临床实践中的广泛差异。多学科的方法是可取的,临床指南有必要为这些疾病的管理提供共同的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信