Risk assessment of lymph node metastasis and comparison of treatment modalities for low-risk T1b colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Mengjia Tian, Kaihan Wu, Chencong Zhou, Xuan Huang
{"title":"Risk assessment of lymph node metastasis and comparison of treatment modalities for low-risk T1b colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Mengjia Tian, Kaihan Wu, Chencong Zhou, Xuan Huang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12240-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The uncertainty surrounding the risk of recurrence and metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) with solely deep submucosal invasion (DSI, defined as T1b, submucosal invasion exceeding 1000 μm) as a high-risk factor has led to controversial treatment strategies. This meta-analysis aims to assess the risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 CRC patients presenting with a solitary risk factor of DSI. Furthermore, it compares the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection, surgery after endoscopic resection, and surgical resection in this context, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched to identify available studies published up to November 30, 2024. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied in the meta-analyses. Heterogeneity and consistency were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis encompassed 3331 cases of low-risk T1b CRC, pooled from 22 studies. The lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate of low-risk T1b CRC is 2.5% (95% CI 1.3-3.8%). Patients of this kind treated with endoscopic resection, surgery after endoscopic resection, or surgical resection alone do not differ statistically significantly in terms of recurrence rates (P = 0.28) or disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (P = 0.66). In addition, R0 resection could be achieved with endoscopic resection in the majority of patients, without serious adverse events reported in documented cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with early-stage colorectal cancer presenting as DSI and devoid of other risk factors, treatment should be individualized. In such cases, given the low LNM rate, appropriately expanding the indications for endoscopic treatment and implementing rigorous follow-up post-endoscopic resection may represent a feasible strategy for selected patients, especially when balancing risks of unnecessary surgery. Otherwise, surgical resection remains the preferred treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12240-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The uncertainty surrounding the risk of recurrence and metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) with solely deep submucosal invasion (DSI, defined as T1b, submucosal invasion exceeding 1000 μm) as a high-risk factor has led to controversial treatment strategies. This meta-analysis aims to assess the risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 CRC patients presenting with a solitary risk factor of DSI. Furthermore, it compares the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection, surgery after endoscopic resection, and surgical resection in this context, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched to identify available studies published up to November 30, 2024. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied in the meta-analyses. Heterogeneity and consistency were evaluated.

Results: The analysis encompassed 3331 cases of low-risk T1b CRC, pooled from 22 studies. The lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate of low-risk T1b CRC is 2.5% (95% CI 1.3-3.8%). Patients of this kind treated with endoscopic resection, surgery after endoscopic resection, or surgical resection alone do not differ statistically significantly in terms of recurrence rates (P = 0.28) or disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (P = 0.66). In addition, R0 resection could be achieved with endoscopic resection in the majority of patients, without serious adverse events reported in documented cases.

Conclusions: For patients with early-stage colorectal cancer presenting as DSI and devoid of other risk factors, treatment should be individualized. In such cases, given the low LNM rate, appropriately expanding the indications for endoscopic treatment and implementing rigorous follow-up post-endoscopic resection may represent a feasible strategy for selected patients, especially when balancing risks of unnecessary surgery. Otherwise, surgical resection remains the preferred treatment.

低风险T1b结直肠癌淋巴结转移风险评估及治疗方式比较:荟萃分析
背景和目的:单纯粘膜下深部浸润(DSI,定义为T1b,粘膜下浸润超过1000 μm)为高危因素的T1型结直肠癌(CRC)复发和转移风险的不确定性导致治疗策略存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估以DSI为单独危险因素的T1 CRC患者的淋巴结转移风险。此外,比较内镜下切除、内镜下切除后手术和手术切除的有效性和安全性,为临床决策提供有价值的见解。方法:检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库,以确定截至2024年11月30日发表的可用研究。meta分析采用随机或固定效应模型。评估异质性和一致性。结果:该分析包括来自22项研究的3331例低风险T1b CRC。低危T1b结直肠癌的淋巴结转移(LNM)率为2.5% (95% CI 1.3-3.8%)。这类患者在内镜切除、内镜切除后手术或单纯手术切除方面的复发率(P = 0.28)或疾病特异性生存率(DSS) (P = 0.66)无统计学差异。此外,大多数患者可以通过内镜切除实现R0切除,没有严重的不良事件报道。结论:对于表现为DSI且无其他危险因素的早期结直肠癌患者,应个体化治疗。在这种情况下,考虑到低淋巴结转移率,适当扩大内镜治疗适应症并在内镜切除后实施严格的随访可能是一种可行的策略,特别是在平衡不必要手术风险的情况下。否则,手术切除仍然是首选的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信