Botox versus Surgery: Evaluating Patient Treatment Choices for Post-Paralysis Facial Synkinesis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Sahejbir S Bhatia, Benjamin Rail, Dominic Henn, MinJae Lee, Shai M Rozen
{"title":"Botox versus Surgery: Evaluating Patient Treatment Choices for Post-Paralysis Facial Synkinesis.","authors":"Sahejbir S Bhatia, Benjamin Rail, Dominic Henn, MinJae Lee, Shai M Rozen","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment selection for post-paralysis facial synkinesis (PPFS) is a multifaceted decision for patients. This study aims to identify patient factors influencing treatment choice between chemodenervation with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) alone and synkinesis surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PPFS patients presenting between 2009 and 2024 were grouped into those choosing only chemodenervation and those choosing synkinesis surgery. Excluded were untreated patients and those without qualifying photos at least 16 months post-paralysis onset. eFACE was used to quantify synkinesis severity. The primary outcome was choice of treatment type, and the secondary outcome was time from synkinesis diagnosis to surgery. Each was analyzed for associations with patient characteristics using univariable and multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 549 PPFS patients, 231 patients met inclusion criteria. Factors independently associated with selecting surgical treatment included living more than 100 miles from our institution (p < 0.001) and moderate or severe synkinesis (p = 0.010). Time from synkinesis diagnosis to surgery was significantly longer for female patients compared to male patients (adjusted mean difference 441 days; p = 0.025) and for non-White patients compared to White patients (adjusted mean difference 355 days; p = 0.042). Other variables including socioeconomic vulnerability were not found to be independently associated with selection or timing of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients living farther from our institution and those with more severe synkinesis were more likely to choose surgical synkinesis treatment over chemodenervation alone. The time from synkinesis diagnosis to surgery was significantly longer for female compared to male patients and for non-White compared to White patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment selection for post-paralysis facial synkinesis (PPFS) is a multifaceted decision for patients. This study aims to identify patient factors influencing treatment choice between chemodenervation with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) alone and synkinesis surgery.

Methods: PPFS patients presenting between 2009 and 2024 were grouped into those choosing only chemodenervation and those choosing synkinesis surgery. Excluded were untreated patients and those without qualifying photos at least 16 months post-paralysis onset. eFACE was used to quantify synkinesis severity. The primary outcome was choice of treatment type, and the secondary outcome was time from synkinesis diagnosis to surgery. Each was analyzed for associations with patient characteristics using univariable and multivariable analysis.

Results: Of 549 PPFS patients, 231 patients met inclusion criteria. Factors independently associated with selecting surgical treatment included living more than 100 miles from our institution (p < 0.001) and moderate or severe synkinesis (p = 0.010). Time from synkinesis diagnosis to surgery was significantly longer for female patients compared to male patients (adjusted mean difference 441 days; p = 0.025) and for non-White patients compared to White patients (adjusted mean difference 355 days; p = 0.042). Other variables including socioeconomic vulnerability were not found to be independently associated with selection or timing of treatment.

Conclusions: Patients living farther from our institution and those with more severe synkinesis were more likely to choose surgical synkinesis treatment over chemodenervation alone. The time from synkinesis diagnosis to surgery was significantly longer for female compared to male patients and for non-White compared to White patients.

肉毒杆菌与手术:评估瘫痪后面部联动性的患者治疗选择。
背景:瘫痪后面部联动性(PPFS)的治疗选择是患者多方面的决定。本研究旨在确定影响单药肉毒杆菌毒素(Botox)化疗神经移植和联合手术治疗选择的患者因素。方法:2009 ~ 2024年PPFS患者分为单纯化疗神经支配组和联合手术组。排除了未经治疗的患者和瘫痪发作后至少16个月没有合格照片的患者。eFACE用于量化联动性严重程度。主要观察指标为治疗方式的选择,次要观察指标为联胞症诊断到手术的时间。使用单变量和多变量分析分析每一项与患者特征的关联。结果:549例PPFS患者中,231例符合纳入标准。选择手术治疗的独立相关因素包括居住地距离我们的机构超过100英里(p < 0.001)和中度或重度联动性(p = 0.010)。女性患者从联性运动诊断到手术的时间明显长于男性患者(调整平均差441天,p = 0.025),非白人患者明显长于白人患者(调整平均差355天,p = 0.042)。包括社会经济脆弱性在内的其他变量未被发现与治疗的选择或时机独立相关。结论:离本院较远的患者和联动性较严重的患者更倾向于选择手术联动性治疗,而不是单纯的化学神经支配。从联胞症诊断到手术的时间,女性患者明显长于男性患者,非白人患者明显长于白人患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信