Thomas J Sitzman, Thomas D Samson, Raymond W Tse, Damir B Matic, David M Fisher, Stephen P Beals, Alexander C Allori, Jeffrey R Marcus, Michael Bezuhly, Helena Hanna
{"title":"A Rating Scale for Obtaining Specific, Actionable Evaluations of Nasolabial Aesthetics After Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.","authors":"Thomas J Sitzman, Thomas D Samson, Raymond W Tse, Damir B Matic, David M Fisher, Stephen P Beals, Alexander C Allori, Jeffrey R Marcus, Michael Bezuhly, Helena Hanna","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons pursuing improvement in the aesthetic outcomes of their cleft lip repairs may benefit from a granular scale evaluating individual objectives of the repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group of nine surgeons convened to develop an assessment scale for nasolabial aesthetics after unilateral cleft lip repair. The group identified objectives of the repair that could be evaluated using two-dimensional facial photographs. Scale items were developed to appraise success or failure in achieving each objective. Scale items were iteratively tested and refined. The scale was subsequently implemented as part of a continuing medical education course that included self-evaluation and peer-to-peer education, culminating in the formation of individual plans for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve distinct objectives of unilateral cleft lip repair were identified, of which ten could be evaluated using photographs routinely obtained in clinical practice. A comprehensive scale was developed incorporating these ten objectives. Each scale item takes the form of a binary (yes/no) question evaluating a specific aesthetic concept, with accompanying reference images. Intra-rater reliability for each item ranged from moderate to substantial [κ = 0.57-0.81]. Inter-rater reliability ranged from fair to substantial [κ = 0.27-0.81]. When implemented in a continuing medical education course, the scale enabled surgeons to identify specific opportunities for improvement in their repair and specific surgical maneuvers to adopt in pursuit of these improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A new scale for evaluating outcomes of unilateral cleft lip repair is presented. The scale provides specific, actionable evaluations for individual objectives of the repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Surgeons pursuing improvement in the aesthetic outcomes of their cleft lip repairs may benefit from a granular scale evaluating individual objectives of the repair.
Methods: A working group of nine surgeons convened to develop an assessment scale for nasolabial aesthetics after unilateral cleft lip repair. The group identified objectives of the repair that could be evaluated using two-dimensional facial photographs. Scale items were developed to appraise success or failure in achieving each objective. Scale items were iteratively tested and refined. The scale was subsequently implemented as part of a continuing medical education course that included self-evaluation and peer-to-peer education, culminating in the formation of individual plans for improvement.
Results: Twelve distinct objectives of unilateral cleft lip repair were identified, of which ten could be evaluated using photographs routinely obtained in clinical practice. A comprehensive scale was developed incorporating these ten objectives. Each scale item takes the form of a binary (yes/no) question evaluating a specific aesthetic concept, with accompanying reference images. Intra-rater reliability for each item ranged from moderate to substantial [κ = 0.57-0.81]. Inter-rater reliability ranged from fair to substantial [κ = 0.27-0.81]. When implemented in a continuing medical education course, the scale enabled surgeons to identify specific opportunities for improvement in their repair and specific surgical maneuvers to adopt in pursuit of these improvements.
Conclusion: A new scale for evaluating outcomes of unilateral cleft lip repair is presented. The scale provides specific, actionable evaluations for individual objectives of the repair.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.