Samir Delibegovic, Enes Idrizovic, Muhamed Katica, Jasminka Mustedanagic, Elmir Cickusic, Aida Katica, Haris Kuralic
{"title":"Inflammatory Reaction and Formation of Adhesions after Intraperitoneal Application of Biological SIS Mesh.","authors":"Samir Delibegovic, Enes Idrizovic, Muhamed Katica, Jasminka Mustedanagic, Elmir Cickusic, Aida Katica, Haris Kuralic","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological mesh derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has a higher porosity and is more hydrophilic than tissue derived from bovine and cow dermal tissues. Therefore, we believe SIS mesh will lead to a milder inflammatory reaction than other, polypropylene and polypropylene-polydioxanone meshes, fewer adhesions, and less mesh shrinkage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety rats were divided randomly into three groups: in group 1, polypropylene mesh was implanted; in group 2, polypropylene-polydioxanone; and in group 3, the SIS mesh. The meshes were fixed intra-abdominally, in the upper part of the abdomen. Ten animals from each group were sacrificed on days 7, 28, and 60 after the implantation. Relaparotomy was performed, with a left paramedial incision and the adhesions formed were assessed according to the Surgical Membrane Study Group (SMSG) score, along with the percentage of shrinkage of the mesh, and any inflammation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in terms of inflammatory reaction or the formation of adhesions between the meshes tested on the 7th day after implantation. However, the shrinkage of the SIS mesh was more expressed. On days 28 and 60, the SIS mesh caused less inflammatory reaction and formation of adhesions in relation to the other meshes tested. On day 60, there was no significant difference in the size of the meshes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed that, despite conflicting views on biological mesh, SIS mesh results in less inflammatory reaction, less adhesion formation, and a lesser degree of shrinkage, and can take its place in hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Biological mesh derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) has a higher porosity and is more hydrophilic than tissue derived from bovine and cow dermal tissues. Therefore, we believe SIS mesh will lead to a milder inflammatory reaction than other, polypropylene and polypropylene-polydioxanone meshes, fewer adhesions, and less mesh shrinkage.
Methods: Ninety rats were divided randomly into three groups: in group 1, polypropylene mesh was implanted; in group 2, polypropylene-polydioxanone; and in group 3, the SIS mesh. The meshes were fixed intra-abdominally, in the upper part of the abdomen. Ten animals from each group were sacrificed on days 7, 28, and 60 after the implantation. Relaparotomy was performed, with a left paramedial incision and the adhesions formed were assessed according to the Surgical Membrane Study Group (SMSG) score, along with the percentage of shrinkage of the mesh, and any inflammation.
Results: There were no differences in terms of inflammatory reaction or the formation of adhesions between the meshes tested on the 7th day after implantation. However, the shrinkage of the SIS mesh was more expressed. On days 28 and 60, the SIS mesh caused less inflammatory reaction and formation of adhesions in relation to the other meshes tested. On day 60, there was no significant difference in the size of the meshes.
Conclusion: This study confirmed that, despite conflicting views on biological mesh, SIS mesh results in less inflammatory reaction, less adhesion formation, and a lesser degree of shrinkage, and can take its place in hernia repair.
期刊介绍:
JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.