Development of an Endpoint-Specific Fingerprint to Identify Structurally Similar Chemicals for Skin Sensitization Assessment by Read-Across.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Sho Suzuki, Hideyuki Mizumachi, Yuichi Ito
{"title":"Development of an Endpoint-Specific Fingerprint to Identify Structurally Similar Chemicals for Skin Sensitization Assessment by Read-Across.","authors":"Sho Suzuki, Hideyuki Mizumachi, Yuichi Ito","doi":"10.1002/jat.4934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human health risk assessment of cosmetic ingredients must address skin sensitization due to their direct skin application. With the recent shift toward Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA), which utilizes animal-free alternative testing methods, the read-across (RAx) approach has gained prominence. RAx relies on information from structural analogues to fill data gaps and determine a point of departure (PoD). A major challenge in RAx is assessing \"similarity\" between the target chemical and its analogues, typically based on chemical structure, physicochemical properties, metabolic reactivity, in silico prediction profile, and biological activity. Structural similarity, often evaluated using the Tanimoto coefficient (Tc), is a common first step, and it relies on fingerprints that convert chemical structures into machine-readable formats. However, fingerprint choice significantly influences Tc calculations and subsequent analogue selection. Moreover, no guidelines exist for the use of specific fingerprints, and which fingerprint is most suitable for skin sensitization assessment by RAx has not yet been established. This study aimed to develop a novel fingerprint specifically optimized for skin sensitization assessment. A large dataset of chemicals with the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA)-positive data was used for performance evaluation of various fingerprints. Our findings revealed that a novel fingerprint incorporating Protein Binding Alert-based Fingerprint (PBAF) and Klekota-Roth fingerprint (KRFP) features into ToxPrint outperformed others in separating suitable from unsuitable chemical pairs for RAx. This study underscores the importance of endpoint-specific fingerprint development to improve analogue selection for skin sensitization risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human health risk assessment of cosmetic ingredients must address skin sensitization due to their direct skin application. With the recent shift toward Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA), which utilizes animal-free alternative testing methods, the read-across (RAx) approach has gained prominence. RAx relies on information from structural analogues to fill data gaps and determine a point of departure (PoD). A major challenge in RAx is assessing "similarity" between the target chemical and its analogues, typically based on chemical structure, physicochemical properties, metabolic reactivity, in silico prediction profile, and biological activity. Structural similarity, often evaluated using the Tanimoto coefficient (Tc), is a common first step, and it relies on fingerprints that convert chemical structures into machine-readable formats. However, fingerprint choice significantly influences Tc calculations and subsequent analogue selection. Moreover, no guidelines exist for the use of specific fingerprints, and which fingerprint is most suitable for skin sensitization assessment by RAx has not yet been established. This study aimed to develop a novel fingerprint specifically optimized for skin sensitization assessment. A large dataset of chemicals with the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA)-positive data was used for performance evaluation of various fingerprints. Our findings revealed that a novel fingerprint incorporating Protein Binding Alert-based Fingerprint (PBAF) and Klekota-Roth fingerprint (KRFP) features into ToxPrint outperformed others in separating suitable from unsuitable chemical pairs for RAx. This study underscores the importance of endpoint-specific fingerprint development to improve analogue selection for skin sensitization risk assessments.

一个端点特异性指纹的发展,以识别结构相似的化学物质的皮肤敏化评估通过读取。
对化妆品成分的人体健康风险评估必须考虑到由于其直接应用于皮肤而引起的皮肤致敏。随着最近向下一代风险评估(NGRA)的转变,它利用无动物替代测试方法,跨读(RAx)方法得到了突出。RAx依赖于来自结构类似物的信息来填补数据空白并确定起点(PoD)。RAx的一个主要挑战是评估目标化学物质与其类似物之间的“相似性”,通常基于化学结构、物理化学性质、代谢反应性、硅预测曲线和生物活性。通常使用谷本系数(Tanimoto coefficient, Tc)来评估结构相似性,这是常见的第一步,它依赖于将化学结构转换为机器可读格式的指纹。然而,指纹选择显著影响Tc计算和随后的模拟选择。此外,目前还没有针对特定指纹使用的指南,哪一种指纹最适合用RAx进行皮肤致敏评估,目前还没有定论。本研究旨在开发一种专门用于皮肤致敏评估的新型指纹。使用具有小鼠局部淋巴结分析(LLNA)阳性数据的大型化学物质数据集对各种指纹进行性能评估。我们的研究结果表明,结合蛋白结合报警指纹(PBAF)和Klekota-Roth指纹(KRFP)特征的新型指纹图谱在分离RAx的合适和不合适的化学对方面优于其他指纹图谱。这项研究强调了端点特异性指纹开发的重要性,以改善皮肤致敏风险评估的类似物选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
145
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed original reviews and hypothesis-driven research articles on mechanistic, fundamental and applied research relating to the toxicity of drugs and chemicals at the molecular, cellular, tissue, target organ and whole body level in vivo (by all relevant routes of exposure) and in vitro / ex vivo. All aspects of toxicology are covered (including but not limited to nanotoxicology, genomics and proteomics, teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, reproductive and endocrine toxicology, toxicopathology, target organ toxicity, systems toxicity (eg immunotoxicity), neurobehavioral toxicology, mechanistic studies, biochemical and molecular toxicology, novel biomarkers, pharmacokinetics/PBPK, risk assessment and environmental health studies) and emphasis is given to papers of clear application to human health, and/or advance mechanistic understanding and/or provide significant contributions and impact to their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信