{"title":"Impact of Telemedicine on Health Expenditures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Hikaru Aihara, Ichiro Kawachi, Benjamin D Sommers","doi":"10.2196/72051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of telemedicine on health expenditures and health outcomes are an important policy question. Many countries loosened regulations on the use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, thereby offering an opportunity to evaluate these effects via a natural experiment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effect of greater telemedicine use on area-level health expenditures and health outcomes related to common chronic conditions in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared prefectures (area levels of government) with higher prepandemic telemedicine rates (fiscal year [FY] 2019) versus those with lower rates and conducted a difference-in-differences analysis of the change in prefecture-level health expenditures from FY2017 to FY2022 and health outcomes from FY2017 to FY2021. The participants were the total population in Japan from FY2017 to FY2022 (n=126 million), and the exposure was the increase in telemedicine use following the government's relaxation of restrictions on telemedicine use as an exceptional measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our main outcomes were the share of outpatient claims that were for telehealth services; total, inpatient, and outpatient annual prefecture-level health expenditures; all-cause mortality, glycated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment prefectures (n=15, population of 62 million) were defined as those with greater-than-median telemedicine use before the pandemic, while control prefectures (n=32, population of 64 million) were defined as those with less-than-median telemedicine use. Treatment and control prefectures shared similar demographic characteristics before the pandemic. The growth in telemedicine after 2020 as a share of outpatient claims increased among the treatment prefectures by 0.35 percentage points more than among control prefectures, which represented more than a threefold increase in telemedicine use compared to the prepandemic median. In difference-in-differences analyses, this difference was associated with a 1.0% relative decrease (95% CI 0.3%-1.8%) in total health expenditure (P=.006) and a 1.1% relative decrease (95% CI 0.2%-2.0%) in inpatient expenditure (P=.02). Outpatient expenditures showed no significant difference as a result of increased telemedicine adoption. Most health outcomes-all-cause mortality, glycated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-did not show any significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Areas in Japan with greater expansion of telemedicine use during the pandemic experienced a significant decrease in both inpatient and total health care spending compared with areas with less telemedicine use, without harming health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e72051"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The effects of telemedicine on health expenditures and health outcomes are an important policy question. Many countries loosened regulations on the use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, thereby offering an opportunity to evaluate these effects via a natural experiment.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of greater telemedicine use on area-level health expenditures and health outcomes related to common chronic conditions in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We compared prefectures (area levels of government) with higher prepandemic telemedicine rates (fiscal year [FY] 2019) versus those with lower rates and conducted a difference-in-differences analysis of the change in prefecture-level health expenditures from FY2017 to FY2022 and health outcomes from FY2017 to FY2021. The participants were the total population in Japan from FY2017 to FY2022 (n=126 million), and the exposure was the increase in telemedicine use following the government's relaxation of restrictions on telemedicine use as an exceptional measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our main outcomes were the share of outpatient claims that were for telehealth services; total, inpatient, and outpatient annual prefecture-level health expenditures; all-cause mortality, glycated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Results: Treatment prefectures (n=15, population of 62 million) were defined as those with greater-than-median telemedicine use before the pandemic, while control prefectures (n=32, population of 64 million) were defined as those with less-than-median telemedicine use. Treatment and control prefectures shared similar demographic characteristics before the pandemic. The growth in telemedicine after 2020 as a share of outpatient claims increased among the treatment prefectures by 0.35 percentage points more than among control prefectures, which represented more than a threefold increase in telemedicine use compared to the prepandemic median. In difference-in-differences analyses, this difference was associated with a 1.0% relative decrease (95% CI 0.3%-1.8%) in total health expenditure (P=.006) and a 1.1% relative decrease (95% CI 0.2%-2.0%) in inpatient expenditure (P=.02). Outpatient expenditures showed no significant difference as a result of increased telemedicine adoption. Most health outcomes-all-cause mortality, glycated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-did not show any significant changes.
Conclusions: Areas in Japan with greater expansion of telemedicine use during the pandemic experienced a significant decrease in both inpatient and total health care spending compared with areas with less telemedicine use, without harming health outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades.
As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor.
Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.