Pharmacological therapies for alcohol use disorder reduce hepatic decompensation & mortality in alcohol-related liver disease: A GRADE evaluation through a meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Manya Prasad, Mohit Varshney, Priyanka Aggarwal
{"title":"Pharmacological therapies for alcohol use disorder reduce hepatic decompensation & mortality in alcohol-related liver disease: A GRADE evaluation through a meta-analysis.","authors":"Manya Prasad, Mohit Varshney, Priyanka Aggarwal","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_2086_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives The role of behavioural therapies for alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been reported in patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD); however, that of pharmacological treatments is yet to be established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the use of these pharmacological interventions in ALD for liver-related and patient-important outcomes, including abstinence. Methods We conducted a systematic search of four major databases. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect estimates with 95 per cent confidence intervals (CI). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool and categorised as high, moderate, low, or very low. Results Altogether, eleven studies (1 RCT and 10 cohort studies) were included in the systematic review and eight studies in the meta-analyses. Meta-analysis of two cohort studies (44813 participants) showed significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality with the use of AUD pharmacotherapy with acceptable statistical heterogeneity [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.79-0.93; I2 = 0%]. Meta-analysis of one RCT and three cohort studies (303 participants) for the outcome of abstinence revealed a pooled proportion of 47.5 per cent (95% CI, 42.1-52.9; I2 = 11.7%). The certainty in estimates was very low. Interpretation & conclusions The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that pharmacological therapies in ALD may reduce overall mortality and the incidence of hepatic decompensation. However, given the very low certainty of evidence, these findings should be interpreted with caution and underscore the need for well-designed trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"162 1","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_2086_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives The role of behavioural therapies for alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been reported in patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD); however, that of pharmacological treatments is yet to be established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the use of these pharmacological interventions in ALD for liver-related and patient-important outcomes, including abstinence. Methods We conducted a systematic search of four major databases. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect estimates with 95 per cent confidence intervals (CI). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool and categorised as high, moderate, low, or very low. Results Altogether, eleven studies (1 RCT and 10 cohort studies) were included in the systematic review and eight studies in the meta-analyses. Meta-analysis of two cohort studies (44813 participants) showed significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality with the use of AUD pharmacotherapy with acceptable statistical heterogeneity [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% CI 0.79-0.93; I2 = 0%]. Meta-analysis of one RCT and three cohort studies (303 participants) for the outcome of abstinence revealed a pooled proportion of 47.5 per cent (95% CI, 42.1-52.9; I2 = 11.7%). The certainty in estimates was very low. Interpretation & conclusions The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that pharmacological therapies in ALD may reduce overall mortality and the incidence of hepatic decompensation. However, given the very low certainty of evidence, these findings should be interpreted with caution and underscore the need for well-designed trials.

酒精使用障碍的药物治疗可降低酒精相关肝病的肝失代偿和死亡率:通过荟萃分析的GRADE评价
背景与目的行为疗法在酒精相关性肝病(ALD)患者中治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)的作用已有报道;然而,药物治疗的方法尚未建立。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,研究这些药物干预在ALD中对肝脏相关和患者重要结果的使用,包括戒断。方法系统检索4个主要数据库。标题和摘要筛选、全文审查、偏倚风险评估和数据提取由两位审稿人独立完成。随机效应荟萃分析用于计算95%置信区间(CI)的合并效应估计值。使用GRADE(建议评估、发展和评价分级)工具评估证据的确定性,并将其分为高、中、低或极低。结果系统评价共纳入11项研究(1项随机对照试验和10项队列研究),meta分析纳入8项研究。两项队列研究(44813名参与者)的荟萃分析显示,使用AUD药物治疗的全因死亡率显著降低,具有可接受的统计异质性[优势比(OR) 0.86;95% ci 0.79-0.93;I2 = 0%]。一项随机对照试验和三项队列研究(303名参与者)的荟萃分析显示,禁欲结果的总比例为47.5% (95% CI, 42.1-52.9; I2 = 11.7%)。估计的确定性非常低。本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,ALD的药物治疗可以降低总体死亡率和肝脏失代偿的发生率。然而,鉴于证据的确定性非常低,这些发现应谨慎解释,并强调需要精心设计的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信