Decision Support Tool for Self-Management of Insulin Dosing in Type 1 Diabetes with Multiple Daily Injections: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Revital Nimri, Sarit Weizman Demri, Naama Fisch-Shvalb, Ido Muller, Anat Raz, Eran Atlas, Moshe Phillip
{"title":"Decision Support Tool for Self-Management of Insulin Dosing in Type 1 Diabetes with Multiple Daily Injections: A Proof-of-Concept Study.","authors":"Revital Nimri, Sarit Weizman Demri, Naama Fisch-Shvalb, Ido Muller, Anat Raz, Eran Atlas, Moshe Phillip","doi":"10.1177/15209156251380860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To assess feasibility and safety of a decision support system (AI-DSS) that provides algorithm-generated insulin dosing recommendations directly to individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) managed with multiple daily injections (MDI). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-arm, prospective proof-of-concept study included individuals with T1D managed with MDI and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Participants underwent a 4-week run-in period followed by a 12-week intervention phase, during which every two weeks algorithm-generated insulin titration recommendations were provided via a mobile application. CGM metrics were compared between the last 2 weeks of the run-in (baseline) and the last 2 weeks of the intervention periods. Primary safety outcomes included percent time <54 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c and time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study cohort included 16 young adults (mean age 25.1 ± 4.1 years; 56% female, mean HbA1c 7.6% ± 0.8%) who completed the study. Median HbA1c significantly decreased from 7.5% (IQR: 7.1, 8) to 7.1% (IQR: 6.5, 7.3), from start to end of study (<i>P</i> = 0.013). TIR significantly improved by 3.5% ± 7.3% (<i>P</i> = 0.039). Time <54 mg/dL remained unchanged (0.9% ± 0.86% vs. 1.12% ± 1.11%; <i>P</i> = 0.191), with a trend toward reduced time >250 mg/dL (14.3% ± 10.71% vs. 12.32% ± 10.91%; <i>P</i> = 0.055). No severe adverse events were reported. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Decision support tool for self-managed insulin dosing in individuals with T1D using MDI was feasible, safe, and improved glycemic control, supporting further evaluation in large-scale randomized trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251380860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess feasibility and safety of a decision support system (AI-DSS) that provides algorithm-generated insulin dosing recommendations directly to individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) managed with multiple daily injections (MDI). Methods: This single-arm, prospective proof-of-concept study included individuals with T1D managed with MDI and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Participants underwent a 4-week run-in period followed by a 12-week intervention phase, during which every two weeks algorithm-generated insulin titration recommendations were provided via a mobile application. CGM metrics were compared between the last 2 weeks of the run-in (baseline) and the last 2 weeks of the intervention periods. Primary safety outcomes included percent time <54 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c and time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL). Results: The study cohort included 16 young adults (mean age 25.1 ± 4.1 years; 56% female, mean HbA1c 7.6% ± 0.8%) who completed the study. Median HbA1c significantly decreased from 7.5% (IQR: 7.1, 8) to 7.1% (IQR: 6.5, 7.3), from start to end of study (P = 0.013). TIR significantly improved by 3.5% ± 7.3% (P = 0.039). Time <54 mg/dL remained unchanged (0.9% ± 0.86% vs. 1.12% ± 1.11%; P = 0.191), with a trend toward reduced time >250 mg/dL (14.3% ± 10.71% vs. 12.32% ± 10.91%; P = 0.055). No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Decision support tool for self-managed insulin dosing in individuals with T1D using MDI was feasible, safe, and improved glycemic control, supporting further evaluation in large-scale randomized trials.

1型糖尿病患者每日多次注射胰岛素剂量自我管理的决策支持工具:一项概念验证研究
目的:评估决策支持系统(AI-DSS)的可行性和安全性,该系统可直接向通过多次每日注射(MDI)管理的1型糖尿病(T1D)患者提供算法生成的胰岛素剂量建议。方法:这项单臂前瞻性概念验证研究纳入了接受MDI和连续血糖监测(CGM)治疗的T1D患者。参与者经历了4周的磨合期,随后是12周的干预阶段,在此期间,每两周通过移动应用程序提供算法生成的胰岛素滴定建议。在磨合的最后2周(基线)和干预期的最后2周之间比较CGM指标。主要安全指标包括250 mg/dL的百分比时间。次要结局包括HbA1c的变化和范围内时间(TIR, 70-180 mg/dL)。结果:研究队列包括16名完成研究的年轻人(平均年龄25.1±4.1岁;56%为女性,平均HbA1c为7.6%±0.8%)。从研究开始到结束,中位HbA1c从7.5% (IQR: 7.1, 8)显著降低到7.1% (IQR: 6.5, 7.3) (P = 0.013)。TIR显著提高3.5%±7.3% (P = 0.039)。时间P = 0.191),且在250 mg/dL时有降低时间的趋势(14.3%±10.71% vs. 12.32%±10.91%;P = 0.055)。无严重不良事件报告。结论:使用MDI的T1D患者自我管理胰岛素剂量的决策支持工具是可行的、安全的,并且可以改善血糖控制,支持在大规模随机试验中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信