{"title":"Decision Support Tool for Self-Management of Insulin Dosing in Type 1 Diabetes with Multiple Daily Injections: A Proof-of-Concept Study.","authors":"Revital Nimri, Sarit Weizman Demri, Naama Fisch-Shvalb, Ido Muller, Anat Raz, Eran Atlas, Moshe Phillip","doi":"10.1177/15209156251380860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To assess feasibility and safety of a decision support system (AI-DSS) that provides algorithm-generated insulin dosing recommendations directly to individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) managed with multiple daily injections (MDI). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-arm, prospective proof-of-concept study included individuals with T1D managed with MDI and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Participants underwent a 4-week run-in period followed by a 12-week intervention phase, during which every two weeks algorithm-generated insulin titration recommendations were provided via a mobile application. CGM metrics were compared between the last 2 weeks of the run-in (baseline) and the last 2 weeks of the intervention periods. Primary safety outcomes included percent time <54 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c and time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study cohort included 16 young adults (mean age 25.1 ± 4.1 years; 56% female, mean HbA1c 7.6% ± 0.8%) who completed the study. Median HbA1c significantly decreased from 7.5% (IQR: 7.1, 8) to 7.1% (IQR: 6.5, 7.3), from start to end of study (<i>P</i> = 0.013). TIR significantly improved by 3.5% ± 7.3% (<i>P</i> = 0.039). Time <54 mg/dL remained unchanged (0.9% ± 0.86% vs. 1.12% ± 1.11%; <i>P</i> = 0.191), with a trend toward reduced time >250 mg/dL (14.3% ± 10.71% vs. 12.32% ± 10.91%; <i>P</i> = 0.055). No severe adverse events were reported. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Decision support tool for self-managed insulin dosing in individuals with T1D using MDI was feasible, safe, and improved glycemic control, supporting further evaluation in large-scale randomized trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251380860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess feasibility and safety of a decision support system (AI-DSS) that provides algorithm-generated insulin dosing recommendations directly to individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) managed with multiple daily injections (MDI). Methods: This single-arm, prospective proof-of-concept study included individuals with T1D managed with MDI and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Participants underwent a 4-week run-in period followed by a 12-week intervention phase, during which every two weeks algorithm-generated insulin titration recommendations were provided via a mobile application. CGM metrics were compared between the last 2 weeks of the run-in (baseline) and the last 2 weeks of the intervention periods. Primary safety outcomes included percent time <54 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL. Secondary outcomes included changes in HbA1c and time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL). Results: The study cohort included 16 young adults (mean age 25.1 ± 4.1 years; 56% female, mean HbA1c 7.6% ± 0.8%) who completed the study. Median HbA1c significantly decreased from 7.5% (IQR: 7.1, 8) to 7.1% (IQR: 6.5, 7.3), from start to end of study (P = 0.013). TIR significantly improved by 3.5% ± 7.3% (P = 0.039). Time <54 mg/dL remained unchanged (0.9% ± 0.86% vs. 1.12% ± 1.11%; P = 0.191), with a trend toward reduced time >250 mg/dL (14.3% ± 10.71% vs. 12.32% ± 10.91%; P = 0.055). No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Decision support tool for self-managed insulin dosing in individuals with T1D using MDI was feasible, safe, and improved glycemic control, supporting further evaluation in large-scale randomized trials.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.