Evaluation of bacterial survival on inert surfaces in a hyperbaric environment.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laetitia Hendier, Hervé Soule, Mohamed Abbas, Didier Pittet, Rodrigue Pignel, Sylvain Boet
{"title":"Evaluation of bacterial survival on inert surfaces in a hyperbaric environment.","authors":"Laetitia Hendier, Hervé Soule, Mohamed Abbas, Didier Pittet, Rodrigue Pignel, Sylvain Boet","doi":"10.28920/dhm55.3.231-235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surface cleaning and hand hygiene within hyperbaric chambers are challenging because of the risk of fire with currently used products containing alcohol or glycerine. This study aimed to investigate if hyperbaric conditions could have inhibitory effects on bacteria present on inert materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We deposited Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) on inert materials in an experimental chamber (Comex1200Alu) and compressed the chamber environment with air (253 kPa, 95 minutes) (referred to as indoor). The control was contaminated materials placed outside the chamber (referred to as outdoor). We chose inert materials including plastic, metal, and seat upholstery (imitation leather). We measured bacterial growth and survival and compared the groups using a Student's t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of the surface types tested, there were no significant differences in bacterial reduction between indoor and outdoor conditions for either E. coli or S. aureus and any of the materials (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that pressurised air (253 kPa for 95 minutes) has neither proliferative nor bactericidal action on S. aureus and E. coli colonies deposited on inert surfaces compared to those present outside a hyperbaric chamber in normobaric air conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"55 3","pages":"231-235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm55.3.231-235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surface cleaning and hand hygiene within hyperbaric chambers are challenging because of the risk of fire with currently used products containing alcohol or glycerine. This study aimed to investigate if hyperbaric conditions could have inhibitory effects on bacteria present on inert materials.

Methods: We deposited Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) on inert materials in an experimental chamber (Comex1200Alu) and compressed the chamber environment with air (253 kPa, 95 minutes) (referred to as indoor). The control was contaminated materials placed outside the chamber (referred to as outdoor). We chose inert materials including plastic, metal, and seat upholstery (imitation leather). We measured bacterial growth and survival and compared the groups using a Student's t-test.

Results: Regardless of the surface types tested, there were no significant differences in bacterial reduction between indoor and outdoor conditions for either E. coli or S. aureus and any of the materials (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: We found that pressurised air (253 kPa for 95 minutes) has neither proliferative nor bactericidal action on S. aureus and E. coli colonies deposited on inert surfaces compared to those present outside a hyperbaric chamber in normobaric air conditions.

在高压环境中细菌在惰性表面存活的评估。
导语:由于目前使用的含有酒精或甘油的产品有着火的危险,高压氧舱的表面清洁和手部卫生具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨高压条件是否对存在于惰性材料上的细菌有抑制作用。方法:在Comex1200Alu实验室内,将金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)和大肠杆菌(E. coli)沉积在惰性材料上,用空气(253 kPa, 95分钟)压缩室内环境(简称室内)。对照是将被污染的物质置于室外(简称室外)。我们选择了惰性材料,包括塑料、金属和座椅坐垫(仿皮革)。我们测量了细菌的生长和存活,并使用学生t检验对两组进行了比较。结果:无论测试的表面类型如何,室内和室外条件下大肠杆菌或金黄色葡萄球菌和任何材料的细菌减少量均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:我们发现,与常压空气条件下高压室外的金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌菌落相比,加压空气(253千帕,95分钟)对惰性表面上沉积的金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌菌落既没有增殖作用,也没有杀菌作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信