Comparison of dispatching after motor vehicle accidents - effects of the TPS-eCall system on dispatching time.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Bastian Brune, Fabian Haut, Maximilian Wolf, André Nohl, Frank Herbstreit, Christian Waydhas, Marcel Dudda, Lars Becker
{"title":"Comparison of dispatching after motor vehicle accidents - effects of the TPS-eCall system on dispatching time.","authors":"Bastian Brune, Fabian Haut, Maximilian Wolf, André Nohl, Frank Herbstreit, Christian Waydhas, Marcel Dudda, Lars Becker","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01361-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Over the past 50 years, the concept of the golden hour of shock was established as one of the central tenets of emergency trauma medicine. A shorter duration of prehospital care correlates with a positive change in outcome in numerous studies. Dispatching by the public safety answering points has hardly been discussed to date. Thanks to improved vehicle safety, additional accident data is now available to the emergency call centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the effects of third-party system emergency calls (TPS-eCalls), which have become mandatory in new passenger cars in the EU in 2018, on dispatching in the emergency medical services (EMS). For this purpose, we linked the data of a public-safety answering point (PSAP) and an EMS. All emergency service deployments from 01/01/2023 to 31/12/2023 were evaluated. N = 1546 rescue missions were dispatched after motor vehicle accidents (MVA), 111 after TPS-eCall-alerts, 1435 after conventional alerts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dispatching in the PSAP currently took longer after TPS-eCall alerts than conventional alerts (01:39 ± 01:40 min vs. 02:41 ± 02:01 min, p ≤ 0.001). The differences were only significant in the case of accidents involving ≤ 2 passengers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TPS-eCall data will be available increasingly. The future expansion data availability offers the opportunity to include objective accident data (airbag deployment, number of occupants, change of velocity) in the dispatching process. Adequate technical connection can improve dispatching and shorten preclinical treatment, especially for complex events with more than 2 passengers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01361-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Over the past 50 years, the concept of the golden hour of shock was established as one of the central tenets of emergency trauma medicine. A shorter duration of prehospital care correlates with a positive change in outcome in numerous studies. Dispatching by the public safety answering points has hardly been discussed to date. Thanks to improved vehicle safety, additional accident data is now available to the emergency call centers.

Methods: We investigated the effects of third-party system emergency calls (TPS-eCalls), which have become mandatory in new passenger cars in the EU in 2018, on dispatching in the emergency medical services (EMS). For this purpose, we linked the data of a public-safety answering point (PSAP) and an EMS. All emergency service deployments from 01/01/2023 to 31/12/2023 were evaluated. N = 1546 rescue missions were dispatched after motor vehicle accidents (MVA), 111 after TPS-eCall-alerts, 1435 after conventional alerts.

Results: Dispatching in the PSAP currently took longer after TPS-eCall alerts than conventional alerts (01:39 ± 01:40 min vs. 02:41 ± 02:01 min, p ≤ 0.001). The differences were only significant in the case of accidents involving ≤ 2 passengers.

Conclusions: TPS-eCall data will be available increasingly. The future expansion data availability offers the opportunity to include objective accident data (airbag deployment, number of occupants, change of velocity) in the dispatching process. Adequate technical connection can improve dispatching and shorten preclinical treatment, especially for complex events with more than 2 passengers.

机动车事故后调度的比较——tps - call系统对调度时间的影响。
背景/目的:在过去的50年里,休克黄金时间的概念被确立为急救创伤医学的核心原则之一。在许多研究中,较短的院前护理时间与结果的积极变化相关。公安应答点调度至今鲜有讨论。由于车辆安全性的提高,紧急呼叫中心现在可以获得更多的事故数据。方法:我们调查了第三方系统紧急呼叫(tps - eccall)对紧急医疗服务(EMS)调度的影响,tps - eccall在2018年欧盟新乘用车中已成为强制性配置。为此,我们将公共安全应答点(PSAP)和EMS的数据联系起来。评估了2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间所有应急服务部署。机动车辆事故(MVA)后派出救援任务1546次,tps - ecall报警后派出救援任务111次,常规报警后派出救援任务1435次。结果:在TPS-eCall报警后,PSAP的调度时间比常规报警时要长(01:39±01:40 min vs. 02:41±02:01 min, p≤0.001)。这种差异仅在涉及≤2名乘客的事故中才有意义。结论:TPS-eCall数据将越来越多。未来扩展的数据可用性提供了在调度过程中包括客观事故数据(安全气囊部署、乘员人数、速度变化)的机会。充分的技术连接可以提高调度效率,缩短临床前处理时间,特别是对于2人以上的复杂事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信