The diagnostic performance of the basic versus the detailed telomere Flow FISH test in young patients with aplastic anaemia.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Nicholas F DeCleene, Duc T Nguyen, Susan E Kirk, Hannah L Helber, Ghadir S Sasa, Alison A Bertuch
{"title":"The diagnostic performance of the basic versus the detailed telomere Flow FISH test in young patients with aplastic anaemia.","authors":"Nicholas F DeCleene, Duc T Nguyen, Susan E Kirk, Hannah L Helber, Ghadir S Sasa, Alison A Bertuch","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying telomere biology disorders (TBDs) in patients with aplastic anaemia (AA) is essential for guiding appropriate care. Telomere length (TL) measurement by flow cytometry with fluorescence in situ hybridization supports diagnosis, but the real-world performance of the basic test (lymphocytes and granulocytes) versus the detailed test (which includes four lymphocyte subsets) remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 439 patients who underwent detailed TL testing at our institution from 2008 to 2022. Haematological disease was present in 87%, with AA comprising 56%. We classified 23 subjects with TBD independently of TL, only one of whom had severe AA (SAA) at initial presentation. Granulocyte numbers were insufficient for TL analysis in 28% of subjects, precluding a rigorous assessment of the impact of granulocyte TL on identification of TBD. Very low TL in lymphocytes or ≥3 lymphocyte subsets identified all TBD cases across AA severity. However, positive predictive value (PPV) was low, particularly in SAA. The detailed test had greater specificity and PPV, particularly in mild AA, which had the greatest proportion of TBD cases among those with AA, supporting its use. However, additional diagnostics, such as genetic testing, remain necessary in many cases to confirm TBD and avoid misclassification.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying telomere biology disorders (TBDs) in patients with aplastic anaemia (AA) is essential for guiding appropriate care. Telomere length (TL) measurement by flow cytometry with fluorescence in situ hybridization supports diagnosis, but the real-world performance of the basic test (lymphocytes and granulocytes) versus the detailed test (which includes four lymphocyte subsets) remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 439 patients who underwent detailed TL testing at our institution from 2008 to 2022. Haematological disease was present in 87%, with AA comprising 56%. We classified 23 subjects with TBD independently of TL, only one of whom had severe AA (SAA) at initial presentation. Granulocyte numbers were insufficient for TL analysis in 28% of subjects, precluding a rigorous assessment of the impact of granulocyte TL on identification of TBD. Very low TL in lymphocytes or ≥3 lymphocyte subsets identified all TBD cases across AA severity. However, positive predictive value (PPV) was low, particularly in SAA. The detailed test had greater specificity and PPV, particularly in mild AA, which had the greatest proportion of TBD cases among those with AA, supporting its use. However, additional diagnostics, such as genetic testing, remain necessary in many cases to confirm TBD and avoid misclassification.

基本与详细端粒流量FISH测试在年轻再生障碍性贫血患者中的诊断性能。
识别再生障碍性贫血(AA)患者的端粒生物学障碍(tbd)对于指导适当的治疗至关重要。用流式细胞术和荧光原位杂交技术测量端粒长度(TL)有助于诊断,但基本测试(淋巴细胞和粒细胞)与详细测试(包括四种淋巴细胞亚群)在现实世界中的表现尚不清楚。我们回顾性分析了2008年至2022年在我院接受详细TL检测的439例患者。血液病占87%,AA占56%。我们将23例TBD患者独立于TL进行了分类,其中只有1例在初次就诊时患有严重AA (SAA)。在28%的受试者中,粒细胞数量不足以进行TL分析,因此无法严格评估粒细胞TL对TBD鉴定的影响。淋巴细胞TL非常低或≥3个淋巴细胞亚群可识别所有AA严重程度的TBD病例。然而,阳性预测值(PPV)较低,特别是在SAA中。详细的测试具有更高的特异性和PPV,特别是在轻度AA中,在AA患者中TBD病例的比例最大,支持其使用。然而,在许多病例中,仍然需要额外的诊断,如基因检测,以确认TBD并避免错误分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信