Emergent groups and the informal digital emergent response to hurricane florence in the United States

Andrew S. Pyle , Hillary Smith , Ryan P. Fuller
{"title":"Emergent groups and the informal digital emergent response to hurricane florence in the United States","authors":"Andrew S. Pyle ,&nbsp;Hillary Smith ,&nbsp;Ryan P. Fuller","doi":"10.1016/j.nhres.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our study presents a thematic analysis of 1582 posts from five digital emergent Facebook groups during Hurricane Florence, affecting North and South Carolina in the United States in 2018. We pose four research questions related to the formation and functioning of digital emergent groups during a disaster. Specifically, we examined how groups contributed to response efforts; messages developed across stages of the disaster; grassroots groups' organized disaster response; and how proximity affected group functioning. Participants contributed to disaster response by sharing and seeking information and aid. Groups coordinated logistics; offered affirmation; and provided commentary and humor. Group members supported the formal response through information sharing. Moreover, group members' proximity to the disaster and group structures designed to moderate groups were influential in the groups’ goal attainment. We see an opportunity for emergency managers to coordinate with digital emergent groups through trusted sources such as nonprofits active in disaster response. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100943,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Research","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 633-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592125000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study presents a thematic analysis of 1582 posts from five digital emergent Facebook groups during Hurricane Florence, affecting North and South Carolina in the United States in 2018. We pose four research questions related to the formation and functioning of digital emergent groups during a disaster. Specifically, we examined how groups contributed to response efforts; messages developed across stages of the disaster; grassroots groups' organized disaster response; and how proximity affected group functioning. Participants contributed to disaster response by sharing and seeking information and aid. Groups coordinated logistics; offered affirmation; and provided commentary and humor. Group members supported the formal response through information sharing. Moreover, group members' proximity to the disaster and group structures designed to moderate groups were influential in the groups’ goal attainment. We see an opportunity for emergency managers to coordinate with digital emergent groups through trusted sources such as nonprofits active in disaster response. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
紧急团体和非正式数字紧急响应飓风佛罗伦萨在美国
我们的研究对2018年影响美国北卡罗来纳州和南卡罗来纳州的佛罗伦萨飓风期间来自五个数字新兴Facebook群组的1582个帖子进行了专题分析。我们提出了四个与灾难期间数字应急群体的形成和功能相关的研究问题。具体来说,我们研究了群体如何为应对工作做出贡献;在灾难发生的各个阶段,信息不断发展;基层组织有组织的灾害应对;以及接近度如何影响群体功能。与会者通过分享和寻求信息和援助,为救灾作出了贡献。集团协调物流;提供的肯定;并提供评论和幽默。小组成员通过信息共享支持正式回应。此外,小组成员对灾难的接近程度和为缓和小组设计的小组结构对小组目标的实现有影响。我们认为,应急管理人员有机会通过可信赖的渠道,如积极参与救灾的非营利组织,与数字应急组织进行协调。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信