Multi-hazard vulnerability of code non-conforming RC buildings under earthquake followed by cascading landslide

Akanksha Kunwar , Rabindra Adhikari , Dipendra Gautam
{"title":"Multi-hazard vulnerability of code non-conforming RC buildings under earthquake followed by cascading landslide","authors":"Akanksha Kunwar ,&nbsp;Rabindra Adhikari ,&nbsp;Dipendra Gautam","doi":"10.1016/j.nhres.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Earthquakes can trigger landslides in unstable slopes leading to a sequence of loading in structures. Although seismic vulnerability and landslide vulnerability are considered in many analyses, cascading multi-hazard analysis is not commonly reported in the existing literature. Thus, to replicate the more realistic scenario of multi-hazard cascade, earthquake only and earthquake and triggered landslide vulnerability analyses of representative code non-conforming reinforced concrete (RC) building are performed. Aggravation due to the post-seismic occurrence of landslide debris is quantified for both bare and infill frames. Fragility functions are developed for single and multi-hazard scenarios for bare and infill frame cases. The results reflect that infills can effectively control displacement, which signifies the beneficial effects of infills. It is concluded that the static loading (height of debris) is more sensitive for bare frames, whereas dynamic loading (velocity of flow) is more sensitive for infill frames. The sum of findings highlights that the effects of cascading hazard would be prominent basically at stronger ground shaking rather than the code recommended shaking scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100943,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Research","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 609-617"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592125000137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earthquakes can trigger landslides in unstable slopes leading to a sequence of loading in structures. Although seismic vulnerability and landslide vulnerability are considered in many analyses, cascading multi-hazard analysis is not commonly reported in the existing literature. Thus, to replicate the more realistic scenario of multi-hazard cascade, earthquake only and earthquake and triggered landslide vulnerability analyses of representative code non-conforming reinforced concrete (RC) building are performed. Aggravation due to the post-seismic occurrence of landslide debris is quantified for both bare and infill frames. Fragility functions are developed for single and multi-hazard scenarios for bare and infill frame cases. The results reflect that infills can effectively control displacement, which signifies the beneficial effects of infills. It is concluded that the static loading (height of debris) is more sensitive for bare frames, whereas dynamic loading (velocity of flow) is more sensitive for infill frames. The sum of findings highlights that the effects of cascading hazard would be prominent basically at stronger ground shaking rather than the code recommended shaking scenarios.
地震后级联滑坡作用下不符合规范钢筋混凝土建筑的多危易损性分析
地震会在不稳定的斜坡上引发滑坡,从而导致一系列的结构荷载。虽然在许多分析中考虑了地震易损性和滑坡易损性,但现有文献中对级联多灾害分析的报道并不多见。因此,为了复制多灾害级联、仅地震和地震诱发滑坡的更真实情景,对具有代表性的规范不符合钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑进行了易损性分析。对裸框架和填框架进行了震后滑坡堆积体的量化分析。脆弱性函数是针对裸框架和填充框架的单一和多危害情况开发的。结果表明,充填体能有效控制位移,表明充填体的有益效果。结果表明,静荷载(碎片高度)对裸框架更为敏感,而动荷载(流动速度)对填充框架更为敏感。研究结果表明,在较强的地面震动而不是规范所建议的震动情况下,级联危害的影响将更加突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信