John Cosgrove, N Phil Masiakowski, Emma Scott, Tabitha Hoey, Tina Marshall, Sushmita Shoma Ghose, Nikhil A Patel
{"title":"Trauma Interventions in Schools: Assessing the Evidence Base.","authors":"John Cosgrove, N Phil Masiakowski, Emma Scott, Tabitha Hoey, Tina Marshall, Sushmita Shoma Ghose, Nikhil A Patel","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20250163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Schools can play an important role in delivering trauma interventions to students. This systematic review aimed to examine the level of evidence for school-based trauma intervention models, program components across interventions, and the cost benefits of interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of major databases, gray literature, and evidence-based registries was conducted to identify individual studies published between 2008 and 2022 that tested the effects of school-based trauma interventions on posttraumatic stress and other mental health outcomes. Using established rating criteria, the authors rated interventions as having high, moderate, or low evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 25 different interventions identified across 39 studies, two were rated as having a high level of evidence (ERASE-Stress and Teaching Recovery Techniques), and four were rated as having moderate evidence. Cognitive-behavioral and creative-expressive techniques were common elements across most high- and moderate-evidence interventions. Cost data on school-based trauma interventions were unavailable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review identified several school-based trauma interventions that show effectiveness across a variety of school settings and student populations, making them valuable resources for decision makers. Research is needed on the cost-effectiveness and cost benefits of trauma interventions implemented in school settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520759,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"appips20250163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20250163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Schools can play an important role in delivering trauma interventions to students. This systematic review aimed to examine the level of evidence for school-based trauma intervention models, program components across interventions, and the cost benefits of interventions.
Methods: A search of major databases, gray literature, and evidence-based registries was conducted to identify individual studies published between 2008 and 2022 that tested the effects of school-based trauma interventions on posttraumatic stress and other mental health outcomes. Using established rating criteria, the authors rated interventions as having high, moderate, or low evidence.
Results: Of the 25 different interventions identified across 39 studies, two were rated as having a high level of evidence (ERASE-Stress and Teaching Recovery Techniques), and four were rated as having moderate evidence. Cognitive-behavioral and creative-expressive techniques were common elements across most high- and moderate-evidence interventions. Cost data on school-based trauma interventions were unavailable.
Conclusions: This systematic review identified several school-based trauma interventions that show effectiveness across a variety of school settings and student populations, making them valuable resources for decision makers. Research is needed on the cost-effectiveness and cost benefits of trauma interventions implemented in school settings.
目的:学校在向学生提供创伤干预方面可以发挥重要作用。本系统综述旨在检查基于学校的创伤干预模式的证据水平,跨干预的项目组成部分,以及干预的成本效益。方法:对主要数据库、灰色文献和基于证据的登记进行搜索,以确定2008年至2022年间发表的个别研究,这些研究测试了基于学校的创伤干预对创伤后应激和其他心理健康结果的影响。使用已建立的评级标准,作者将干预措施分为高、中、低证据。结果:在39项研究中确定的25种不同的干预措施中,有两种被评为具有高水平证据(ERASE-Stress and Teaching Recovery Techniques),四种被评为具有中等证据。认知行为和创造性表达技术是大多数高证据和中等证据干预措施的共同要素。关于以学校为基础的创伤干预措施的费用数据无法获得。结论:本系统综述确定了几种基于学校的创伤干预措施,这些干预措施在各种学校环境和学生群体中显示出有效性,使其成为决策者的宝贵资源。需要对在学校环境中实施创伤干预的成本效益和成本效益进行研究。