Including AI in diffusion-weighted breast MRI has potential to increase reader confidence and reduce workload.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Dimitrios Bounias, Lina Simons, Michael Baumgartner, Chris Ehring, Peter Neher, Lorenz A Kapsner, Balint Kovacs, Ralf Floca, Paul F Jaeger, Jessica Eberle, Dominique Hadler, Frederik B Laun, Sabine Ohlmeyer, Lena Maier-Hein, Michael Uder, Evelyn Wenkel, Klaus H Maier-Hein, Sebastian Bickelhaupt
{"title":"Including AI in diffusion-weighted breast MRI has potential to increase reader confidence and reduce workload.","authors":"Dimitrios Bounias, Lina Simons, Michael Baumgartner, Chris Ehring, Peter Neher, Lorenz A Kapsner, Balint Kovacs, Ralf Floca, Paul F Jaeger, Jessica Eberle, Dominique Hadler, Frederik B Laun, Sabine Ohlmeyer, Lena Maier-Hein, Michael Uder, Evelyn Wenkel, Klaus H Maier-Hein, Sebastian Bickelhaupt","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has shown potential as a standalone imaging technique for certain indications, eg, supplemental screening of women with dense breasts. This study evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for clinical interpretation and workload reduction in breast DWI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective IRB-approved study included: n = 824 examinations for model development (2017-2020) and n = 235 for evaluation (01/2021-06/2021). Readings were performed by three readers using either the AI-CAD or manual readings. BI-RADS-like (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) classification was based on DWI. Histopathology served as ground truth. The model was nnDetection-based, trained using 5-fold cross-validation and ensembling. Statistical significance was determined using McNemar's test. Inter-rater agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa. Model performance was calculated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI-augmented approach significantly reduced BI-RADS-like 3 calls in breast DWI by 29% (P =.019) and increased interrater agreement (0.57 ± 0.10 vs 0.49 ± 0.11), while preserving diagnostic accuracy. Two of the three readers detected more malignant lesions (63/69 vs 59/69 and 64/69 vs 62/69) with the AI-CAD. The AI model achieved an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: [0.72, 0.85]; P <.001), which increased for women at screening age to 0.82 (95% CI: [0.73, 0.90]; P <.001), indicating a potential for workload reduction of 20.9% at 96% sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Breast DWI might benefit from AI support. In our study, AI showed potential for reduction of BI-RADS-like 3 calls and increase of inter-rater agreement. However, given the limited study size, further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has shown potential as a standalone imaging technique for certain indications, eg, supplemental screening of women with dense breasts. This study evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for clinical interpretation and workload reduction in breast DWI.

Materials and methods: This retrospective IRB-approved study included: n = 824 examinations for model development (2017-2020) and n = 235 for evaluation (01/2021-06/2021). Readings were performed by three readers using either the AI-CAD or manual readings. BI-RADS-like (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) classification was based on DWI. Histopathology served as ground truth. The model was nnDetection-based, trained using 5-fold cross-validation and ensembling. Statistical significance was determined using McNemar's test. Inter-rater agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa. Model performance was calculated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).

Results: The AI-augmented approach significantly reduced BI-RADS-like 3 calls in breast DWI by 29% (P =.019) and increased interrater agreement (0.57 ± 0.10 vs 0.49 ± 0.11), while preserving diagnostic accuracy. Two of the three readers detected more malignant lesions (63/69 vs 59/69 and 64/69 vs 62/69) with the AI-CAD. The AI model achieved an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: [0.72, 0.85]; P <.001), which increased for women at screening age to 0.82 (95% CI: [0.73, 0.90]; P <.001), indicating a potential for workload reduction of 20.9% at 96% sensitivity.

Discussion and conclusion: Breast DWI might benefit from AI support. In our study, AI showed potential for reduction of BI-RADS-like 3 calls and increase of inter-rater agreement. However, given the limited study size, further research is needed.

在弥散加权乳房MRI中加入人工智能有可能增加读者的信心并减少工作量。
目的:乳腺弥散加权成像(DWI)已经显示出作为一种独立成像技术在某些适应症中的潜力,例如,对致密乳房的女性进行补充筛查。本研究评估了一种人工智能(AI)驱动的计算机辅助诊断(CAD)系统,用于临床解释和减少乳腺DWI的工作量。材料和方法:这项经irb批准的回顾性研究包括:n = 824例模型开发检查(2017-2020)和n = 235例评估检查(2021年1月- 2021年6月)。读数由三名读者使用AI-CAD或手动读数进行。bi - rads类(乳腺成像报告和数据系统)分类基于DWI。组织病理学是最基本的事实。该模型基于nndetection,使用5倍交叉验证和集成进行训练。采用McNemar检验确定统计学显著性。评级机构间的协议是用科恩的kappa来计算的。模型性能计算使用面积下的接收者工作曲线(AUC)。结果:人工智能增强方法在保持诊断准确性的同时,显著减少了乳房DWI中bi - rads样3次呼叫29% (P = 0.019),提高了判据一致性(0.57±0.10 vs 0.49±0.11)。三名读卡器中有两名使用AI-CAD检测到更多的恶性病变(63/69 vs 59/69, 64/69 vs 62/69)。人工智能模型的AUC为0.78 (95% CI: [0.72, 0.85]; P讨论和结论:乳房DWI可能受益于人工智能的支持。在我们的研究中,人工智能显示出减少bi - rad -like 3呼叫和增加评级间协议的潜力。然而,由于研究规模有限,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信