June C Carroll, Michelle Greiver, Sahana Kukan, Erin Bearss, Sakina Walji, Rahim Moineddin, Babak Aliarzadeh, Sumeet Kalia, Judith Allanson, Eva Grunfeld, Karuna Gupta, Ruth Heisey, Doug Kavanagh, Raymond Kim, Michelle Levy, Shawna Morrison, Maria Muraca, Donatus Mutasingwa, Mary Ann O'Brien, Joanne Permaul, Frank Sullivan, Brenda Wilson
{"title":"An Innovative Strategy for Collecting Family Health History: An Effectiveness-Implementation Trial in Primary Care Clinics.","authors":"June C Carroll, Michelle Greiver, Sahana Kukan, Erin Bearss, Sakina Walji, Rahim Moineddin, Babak Aliarzadeh, Sumeet Kalia, Judith Allanson, Eva Grunfeld, Karuna Gupta, Ruth Heisey, Doug Kavanagh, Raymond Kim, Michelle Levy, Shawna Morrison, Maria Muraca, Donatus Mutasingwa, Mary Ann O'Brien, Joanne Permaul, Frank Sullivan, Brenda Wilson","doi":"10.1370/afm.240472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate an innovative strategy to collect family history (FH) and explore patients' views of this strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a matched-pair effectiveness-implementation trial in family practices affiliated with the University of Toronto Practice-Based Research Network (UTOPIAN). The intervention group included family physicians (FPs) from randomly selected practices using electronic health records (EHRs) and an e-mailing platform, and randomly selected patients aged 30-69 years (4/FP/week) seen in clinic over a 6-month period. The matched control group included FPs (1:1) and patients (up to 5:1) from the UTOPIAN database. The intervention included patient and FP education, an e-mailed patient invitation to complete an FH questionnaire, automatic FH EHR upload, FP notification of completed FH questionnaire, and links to clinical support tools. Intervention patients were e-mailed a postvisit follow-up questionnaire. The assessed outcome was new documentation of FH in the EHR using mixed effects logistic regression and descriptive statistics for patient feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen FPs and 576 patients were recruited from 3 multidisciplinary team practices to the intervention group, matched to 15 FPs and 2,203 patients in the control group. Within 30 days of visit, a new FH was documented in the EHR for 93/576 (16.1%) of intervention patients compared with 5/2,203 (0.2%) control patients (adjusted OR = 94.2; 95% CI, 36.8-240.8). New cancer FH documentation was greater in the intervention group compared with the control group (7.8% vs 0.1%; <i>P</i> < .01). Of patients who reported discussing FH (n = 296), 24.5% reported screening test recommended, 7.5% referral to a nongenetics specialist, and 2.4% referral to a genetics specialist. Most patients (60.5%) found this FH strategy helpful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed improved collection/documentation of FH. Contributors to success of the intervention included being patient completed and seamless EHR integration with a reminder. This FH strategy needs tailoring to different contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"23 5","pages":"399-406"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate an innovative strategy to collect family history (FH) and explore patients' views of this strategy.
Methods: We conducted a matched-pair effectiveness-implementation trial in family practices affiliated with the University of Toronto Practice-Based Research Network (UTOPIAN). The intervention group included family physicians (FPs) from randomly selected practices using electronic health records (EHRs) and an e-mailing platform, and randomly selected patients aged 30-69 years (4/FP/week) seen in clinic over a 6-month period. The matched control group included FPs (1:1) and patients (up to 5:1) from the UTOPIAN database. The intervention included patient and FP education, an e-mailed patient invitation to complete an FH questionnaire, automatic FH EHR upload, FP notification of completed FH questionnaire, and links to clinical support tools. Intervention patients were e-mailed a postvisit follow-up questionnaire. The assessed outcome was new documentation of FH in the EHR using mixed effects logistic regression and descriptive statistics for patient feedback.
Results: Fifteen FPs and 576 patients were recruited from 3 multidisciplinary team practices to the intervention group, matched to 15 FPs and 2,203 patients in the control group. Within 30 days of visit, a new FH was documented in the EHR for 93/576 (16.1%) of intervention patients compared with 5/2,203 (0.2%) control patients (adjusted OR = 94.2; 95% CI, 36.8-240.8). New cancer FH documentation was greater in the intervention group compared with the control group (7.8% vs 0.1%; P < .01). Of patients who reported discussing FH (n = 296), 24.5% reported screening test recommended, 7.5% referral to a nongenetics specialist, and 2.4% referral to a genetics specialist. Most patients (60.5%) found this FH strategy helpful.
Conclusions: This study showed improved collection/documentation of FH. Contributors to success of the intervention included being patient completed and seamless EHR integration with a reminder. This FH strategy needs tailoring to different contexts.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.