Temporal Trends, Patient Characteristics, and Outcomes of Type 2 Versus Type 1 Myocardial Infarction Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Amgad Mentias, Neil Keshvani, Milind Y Desai, Samir R Kapadia, Khaled M Ziada, Cian P McCarthy, Hurst M Hall, Ki Park, Dharam J Kumbhani, A Michael Lincoff, James L Januzzi, Ambarish Pandey
{"title":"Temporal Trends, Patient Characteristics, and Outcomes of Type 2 Versus Type 1 Myocardial Infarction Among Medicare Beneficiaries.","authors":"Amgad Mentias, Neil Keshvani, Milind Y Desai, Samir R Kapadia, Khaled M Ziada, Cian P McCarthy, Hurst M Hall, Ki Park, Dharam J Kumbhani, A Michael Lincoff, James L Januzzi, Ambarish Pandey","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) is common among older adults and is associated with adverse outcomes in single-center studies. We aimed to examine temporal trends and compare outcomes between type 1 and type 2 MI in Medicare beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries with type 1 or type 2 MI were identified using <i>International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision</i> codes from Medicare Provider Analysis and Review 100% inpatient files. Temporal trends were assessed from 2018 to 2021. Patients with type 2 MI were matched 1:1 to type 1 MI by age, sex, race, and year. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), and stroke. Time-to-event analyses used Cox models for mortality and Fine-Gray models for hospitalization outcomes, with short-term (≤30 days) and long-term (>30 days) outcomes assessed using landmark analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1 816 926 Medicare beneficiaries, the proportion of type 2 MI increased from 19.4% in 2018 to 26.8% in 2021 (<i>P</i><sub>trend</sub><0.001). In propensity-matched analyses of 94 132 patients (mean age 77.3±11 years, 53.3% male), patients with type 2 (versus type 1) MI had lower short-term all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.59-0.63]), recurrent MI (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.54-0.59]), HFH (sHR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.47-0.67]), and similar risk of stroke (sHR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.90-1.21]). In long-term, patients with type 2 (versus type 1) MI had higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.20-1.26]) and stroke (sHR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.10-1.31]). The risk of recurrent MI and HFH associated with type 2 (versus type 1) MI in long-term follow-up was lower but considerably attenuated in magnitude compared with short-term risk (recurrent MI: sHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.94]; HFH; sHR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.81]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Type 2 MI now accounts for over one-quarter of all MIs and is increasingly diagnosed. While patients with type 1 MI had higher short-term all-cause mortality risk, those with type 2 MI demonstrated higher long-term all-cause mortality and stroke risk, with lower risk of recurrent MI and HFH. These results highlight an urgent need for evidence-based strategies in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e012136"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) is common among older adults and is associated with adverse outcomes in single-center studies. We aimed to examine temporal trends and compare outcomes between type 1 and type 2 MI in Medicare beneficiaries.

Methods: Medicare beneficiaries with type 1 or type 2 MI were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes from Medicare Provider Analysis and Review 100% inpatient files. Temporal trends were assessed from 2018 to 2021. Patients with type 2 MI were matched 1:1 to type 1 MI by age, sex, race, and year. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), and stroke. Time-to-event analyses used Cox models for mortality and Fine-Gray models for hospitalization outcomes, with short-term (≤30 days) and long-term (>30 days) outcomes assessed using landmark analysis.

Results: Among 1 816 926 Medicare beneficiaries, the proportion of type 2 MI increased from 19.4% in 2018 to 26.8% in 2021 (Ptrend<0.001). In propensity-matched analyses of 94 132 patients (mean age 77.3±11 years, 53.3% male), patients with type 2 (versus type 1) MI had lower short-term all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.59-0.63]), recurrent MI (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.54-0.59]), HFH (sHR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.47-0.67]), and similar risk of stroke (sHR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.90-1.21]). In long-term, patients with type 2 (versus type 1) MI had higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.20-1.26]) and stroke (sHR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.10-1.31]). The risk of recurrent MI and HFH associated with type 2 (versus type 1) MI in long-term follow-up was lower but considerably attenuated in magnitude compared with short-term risk (recurrent MI: sHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.94]; HFH; sHR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.81]).

Conclusions: Type 2 MI now accounts for over one-quarter of all MIs and is increasingly diagnosed. While patients with type 1 MI had higher short-term all-cause mortality risk, those with type 2 MI demonstrated higher long-term all-cause mortality and stroke risk, with lower risk of recurrent MI and HFH. These results highlight an urgent need for evidence-based strategies in this high-risk population.

医疗保险受益人中2型与1型心肌梗死的时间趋势、患者特征和结局。
背景:在单中心研究中,2型心肌梗死(MI)在老年人中很常见,并与不良结局相关。我们的目的是研究医疗保险受益人的1型和2型心肌梗死的时间趋势和比较结果。方法:使用国际疾病分类第十次修订代码从医疗保险提供者分析和审查100%住院患者档案中确定1型或2型心肌梗死的医疗保险受益人。评估了2018年至2021年的时间趋势。2型心肌梗死患者按年龄、性别、种族和年龄1:1匹配1型心肌梗死。结果包括全因死亡率、复发性心肌梗死、心力衰竭住院(HFH)和卒中。死亡率时间-事件分析使用Cox模型,住院结局使用Fine-Gray模型,短期(≤30天)和长期(≤30天)结局使用里程碑分析进行评估。结果:在1816926名医疗保险受益人中,2型心肌梗死的比例从2018年的19.4%增加到2021年的26.8% (ptrend结论:2型心肌梗死现在占所有心肌梗死的四分之一以上,并且越来越多地被诊断出来。1型心肌梗死患者有较高的短期全因死亡率,而2型心肌梗死患者有较高的长期全因死亡率和卒中风险,心肌梗死复发和HFH风险较低。这些结果突出了在这一高危人群中迫切需要循证策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信