Barriers and facilitors to compassionate care: A systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Mostafa Ghasempour, Mansour Ghafourifard, Majid Purabdollah, Azad Rahmani
{"title":"Barriers and facilitors to compassionate care: A systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis.","authors":"Mostafa Ghasempour, Mansour Ghafourifard, Majid Purabdollah, Azad Rahmani","doi":"10.1177/09697330251374399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe importance of compassion and compassionate care, as an indicator for quality care, has been well acknowledged in recent years within health care. However, there are some international concerns about the state of compassion in the contemporary healthcare systems. There are many factors that facilitate or inhibit the provision of compassion in clinical settings.ObjectiveThis meta-synthesis of qualitative studies aimed to explore healthcare providers' perceived barriers and facilitators to compassion in healthcare settings.MethodsA systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies were used in this study. Five electronic databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched to identify relevant studies. In this meta-synthesis, Thomas and Harden's thematic analysis approach was undertaken to synthesize the findings of the qualitative studies.ResultsA total of 20 papers were selected for meta-synthesis. The data analysis resulted in the development of three main themes for barriers to compassion: (a) organizational or systemic challenges, (b) personal and individual factors, and (c) patient and family-related factors. Moreover, three main themes for facilitators to compassion emerged from data analysis: (a) supportive organizational culture, (b) personal capacity for compassion, and (c) patient and family reactions.ConclusionThis meta-synthesis showed some barriers and facilitating factors for developing high-quality compassionate care. Understanding factors that influence compassionate care delivery may improve the cultivation of compassionate care. Moreover, identifying these challenges and facilitators provides a comprehensive framework through which healthcare providers, policy makers, and healthcare organizations can assess their own strategies to identify how compassion could be cultivated and developed in healthcare settings. It may inform practical strategies and interventions tailored to foster the delivery of compassionate care in each healthcare setting and improve the quality of care and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251374399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251374399","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe importance of compassion and compassionate care, as an indicator for quality care, has been well acknowledged in recent years within health care. However, there are some international concerns about the state of compassion in the contemporary healthcare systems. There are many factors that facilitate or inhibit the provision of compassion in clinical settings.ObjectiveThis meta-synthesis of qualitative studies aimed to explore healthcare providers' perceived barriers and facilitators to compassion in healthcare settings.MethodsA systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies were used in this study. Five electronic databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched to identify relevant studies. In this meta-synthesis, Thomas and Harden's thematic analysis approach was undertaken to synthesize the findings of the qualitative studies.ResultsA total of 20 papers were selected for meta-synthesis. The data analysis resulted in the development of three main themes for barriers to compassion: (a) organizational or systemic challenges, (b) personal and individual factors, and (c) patient and family-related factors. Moreover, three main themes for facilitators to compassion emerged from data analysis: (a) supportive organizational culture, (b) personal capacity for compassion, and (c) patient and family reactions.ConclusionThis meta-synthesis showed some barriers and facilitating factors for developing high-quality compassionate care. Understanding factors that influence compassionate care delivery may improve the cultivation of compassionate care. Moreover, identifying these challenges and facilitators provides a comprehensive framework through which healthcare providers, policy makers, and healthcare organizations can assess their own strategies to identify how compassion could be cultivated and developed in healthcare settings. It may inform practical strategies and interventions tailored to foster the delivery of compassionate care in each healthcare setting and improve the quality of care and health outcomes.

同情关怀的障碍和促进因素:系统回顾和定性荟萃分析。
近年来,在卫生保健领域,同情和同情护理作为优质护理指标的重要性已得到充分认识。然而,在当代医疗保健系统中,有一些关于同情状态的国际关注。在临床环境中,有许多因素促进或抑制同情心的提供。目的本综合定性研究旨在探讨医疗保健提供者在医疗保健环境中对同情的感知障碍和促进因素。方法采用系统综述和综合定性研究方法。检索Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed/Medline、CINAHL、PsycINFO等5个电子数据库,确定相关研究。在这一综合研究中,采用了Thomas和Harden的主题分析方法来综合定性研究的结果。结果共筛选出20篇论文进行meta综合。通过数据分析,我们得出了三个关于同情障碍的主题:(a)组织或系统挑战,(b)个人和个体因素,以及(c)患者和家庭相关因素。此外,从数据分析中得出了促进同情的三个主要主题:(a)支持性组织文化,(b)个人同情能力,以及(c)患者和家属的反应。结论本综合研究显示了发展高质量体恤护理的一些障碍和促进因素。了解影响同情关怀提供的因素可能会改善同情关怀的培养。此外,识别这些挑战和促进因素提供了一个全面的框架,通过该框架,医疗保健提供者、政策制定者和医疗保健组织可以评估自己的策略,以确定如何在医疗保健环境中培养和发展同情心。它可以为实际的策略和干预措施提供信息,以促进在每个医疗保健环境中提供富有同情心的护理,并提高护理质量和健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信