{"title":"Predicting operative complexity in laparoscopic splenectomy: a validated preoperative scoring system.","authors":"Long-Jiang Chen, Su-Hang Chen, Yuan Fang, Zhi-Lin Wang, Guang-Bin Chen, Xiao-Ming Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12180-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic splenectomy poses significant technical challenges due to variable splenic anatomy and patient-specific factors. A robust preoperative difficulty scoring system is essential to integrate critical predictors into a unified framework. This tool enables objective risk stratification, optimizes resource allocation, and enhances procedural safety through tailored surgical strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel preoperative scoring system tailored to these challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this dual-center retrospective study, 181 patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy were divided into training (n = 118), validation 1 (n = 40), and validation 2 (n = 23) cohorts. Preoperative variables, including demographics, laboratory factors (INR, platelet count, et al.), and imaging indicators (CT-derived thickness, length, width, et al.), were analyzed. Multivariable regression identified predictors of surgical complexity (blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery). A difficulty score integrating regression coefficients and clinical feasibility was developed and validated using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, INR, splenic thickness, and cirrhosis-related hypersplenism emerged as independent predictors of surgical complexity (p < 0.05). The scoring system (range: 0-23) stratified patients into low- (0-7), intermediate- (8-15), and high-risk (16-23) tiers, demonstrating strong discrimination [training cohort AUC: 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.90); validation 1 cohort AUC: 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.94); validation 2 cohort AUC: 0.78 (95% CI 0.58-0.98)]. High-risk patients exhibited significantly greater blood loss, prolonged operative time, and higher conversion to open surgery rates. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed clinical utility, with net benefit surpassing \"treat-all\" strategies across risk thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoring system provides a validated tool for preoperative risk stratification in laparoscopic splenectomy, particularly for cirrhosis-predominant cohorts. By incorporating age, INR, splenic thickness, and pathogenesis, it attempts to account for regional epidemiological variations, potentially contributing to more tailored surgical planning in specific clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12180-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy poses significant technical challenges due to variable splenic anatomy and patient-specific factors. A robust preoperative difficulty scoring system is essential to integrate critical predictors into a unified framework. This tool enables objective risk stratification, optimizes resource allocation, and enhances procedural safety through tailored surgical strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel preoperative scoring system tailored to these challenges.
Methods: In this dual-center retrospective study, 181 patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy were divided into training (n = 118), validation 1 (n = 40), and validation 2 (n = 23) cohorts. Preoperative variables, including demographics, laboratory factors (INR, platelet count, et al.), and imaging indicators (CT-derived thickness, length, width, et al.), were analyzed. Multivariable regression identified predictors of surgical complexity (blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery). A difficulty score integrating regression coefficients and clinical feasibility was developed and validated using ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.
Results: Age, INR, splenic thickness, and cirrhosis-related hypersplenism emerged as independent predictors of surgical complexity (p < 0.05). The scoring system (range: 0-23) stratified patients into low- (0-7), intermediate- (8-15), and high-risk (16-23) tiers, demonstrating strong discrimination [training cohort AUC: 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.90); validation 1 cohort AUC: 0.80 (95% CI 0.66-0.94); validation 2 cohort AUC: 0.78 (95% CI 0.58-0.98)]. High-risk patients exhibited significantly greater blood loss, prolonged operative time, and higher conversion to open surgery rates. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed clinical utility, with net benefit surpassing "treat-all" strategies across risk thresholds.
Conclusions: This scoring system provides a validated tool for preoperative risk stratification in laparoscopic splenectomy, particularly for cirrhosis-predominant cohorts. By incorporating age, INR, splenic thickness, and pathogenesis, it attempts to account for regional epidemiological variations, potentially contributing to more tailored surgical planning in specific clinical contexts.
期刊介绍:
Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research.
Topics covered in the journal include:
-Surgical aspects of:
Interventional endoscopy,
Ultrasound,
Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology,
-Gastroenterologic surgery
-Thoracic surgery
-Traumatic surgery
-Orthopedic surgery
-Pediatric surgery