Logistic Mixed-Effects Model Analysis With Pseudo-Observations for Estimating Risk Ratios in Clustered Binary Data Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Hisashi Noma, Masahiko Gosho
{"title":"Logistic Mixed-Effects Model Analysis With Pseudo-Observations for Estimating Risk Ratios in Clustered Binary Data Analysis.","authors":"Hisashi Noma, Masahiko Gosho","doi":"10.1002/sim.70280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Logistic mixed-effects model has been a standard multivariate analysis method for analyzing clustered binary outcome data, for example, longitudinal studies, clustered randomized trials, and multicenter/regional studies. However, the resultant odds ratio estimator cannot be directly interpreted as an effect measure, and it is only interpreted as an approximation of the risk ratio estimator when the frequency of events is small. In this article, we propose a new statistical analysis method that enables providing a risk ratio estimator in the multilevel statistical model framework. The valid risk ratio estimation is realized via augmenting pseudo-observations to the original dataset and then analyzing the modified dataset by the logistic mixed-effects model. The resultant estimators of fixed effect coefficients are theoretically shown to be consistent estimators of the risk ratios. Also, the standard errors and confidence intervals of the risk ratios can be calculated by the bootstrap method. All of the computations are simply implementable by using the R package \"glmmrr.\" We illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method via applications to a cluster-randomized trial of the maternal and child health handbook and a longitudinal study of respiratory disease. Also, we provide simulation-based evidence for the accuracy and precision of estimation of risk ratios by the proposed method.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 20-22","pages":"e70280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Logistic mixed-effects model has been a standard multivariate analysis method for analyzing clustered binary outcome data, for example, longitudinal studies, clustered randomized trials, and multicenter/regional studies. However, the resultant odds ratio estimator cannot be directly interpreted as an effect measure, and it is only interpreted as an approximation of the risk ratio estimator when the frequency of events is small. In this article, we propose a new statistical analysis method that enables providing a risk ratio estimator in the multilevel statistical model framework. The valid risk ratio estimation is realized via augmenting pseudo-observations to the original dataset and then analyzing the modified dataset by the logistic mixed-effects model. The resultant estimators of fixed effect coefficients are theoretically shown to be consistent estimators of the risk ratios. Also, the standard errors and confidence intervals of the risk ratios can be calculated by the bootstrap method. All of the computations are simply implementable by using the R package "glmmrr." We illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method via applications to a cluster-randomized trial of the maternal and child health handbook and a longitudinal study of respiratory disease. Also, we provide simulation-based evidence for the accuracy and precision of estimation of risk ratios by the proposed method.

聚类二值数据分析中估计风险比的伪观测Logistic混合效应模型分析。
Logistic混合效应模型一直是分析聚类二元结果数据的标准多变量分析方法,如纵向研究、聚类随机试验、多中心/区域研究等。然而,所得的比值比估计量不能直接解释为效应度量,而只能在事件频率较小时解释为风险比估计量的近似值。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的统计分析方法,可以在多层统计模型框架中提供风险比估计量。通过对原始数据集的伪观测值进行扩充,然后利用logistic混合效应模型对修改后的数据集进行分析,实现有效的风险比估计。所得到的固定效应系数估计量在理论上被证明是风险比的一致估计量。采用自举法计算风险比的标准误差和置信区间。所有的计算都可以通过使用R包“glmmrr”来实现。我们通过应用于母婴健康手册的集群随机试验和呼吸系统疾病的纵向研究来说明所提出方法的有效性。此外,我们还提供了基于仿真的证据,证明了该方法估算风险比的准确性和精密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信