{"title":"Logistic Mixed-Effects Model Analysis With Pseudo-Observations for Estimating Risk Ratios in Clustered Binary Data Analysis.","authors":"Hisashi Noma, Masahiko Gosho","doi":"10.1002/sim.70280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Logistic mixed-effects model has been a standard multivariate analysis method for analyzing clustered binary outcome data, for example, longitudinal studies, clustered randomized trials, and multicenter/regional studies. However, the resultant odds ratio estimator cannot be directly interpreted as an effect measure, and it is only interpreted as an approximation of the risk ratio estimator when the frequency of events is small. In this article, we propose a new statistical analysis method that enables providing a risk ratio estimator in the multilevel statistical model framework. The valid risk ratio estimation is realized via augmenting pseudo-observations to the original dataset and then analyzing the modified dataset by the logistic mixed-effects model. The resultant estimators of fixed effect coefficients are theoretically shown to be consistent estimators of the risk ratios. Also, the standard errors and confidence intervals of the risk ratios can be calculated by the bootstrap method. All of the computations are simply implementable by using the R package \"glmmrr.\" We illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method via applications to a cluster-randomized trial of the maternal and child health handbook and a longitudinal study of respiratory disease. Also, we provide simulation-based evidence for the accuracy and precision of estimation of risk ratios by the proposed method.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 20-22","pages":"e70280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Logistic mixed-effects model has been a standard multivariate analysis method for analyzing clustered binary outcome data, for example, longitudinal studies, clustered randomized trials, and multicenter/regional studies. However, the resultant odds ratio estimator cannot be directly interpreted as an effect measure, and it is only interpreted as an approximation of the risk ratio estimator when the frequency of events is small. In this article, we propose a new statistical analysis method that enables providing a risk ratio estimator in the multilevel statistical model framework. The valid risk ratio estimation is realized via augmenting pseudo-observations to the original dataset and then analyzing the modified dataset by the logistic mixed-effects model. The resultant estimators of fixed effect coefficients are theoretically shown to be consistent estimators of the risk ratios. Also, the standard errors and confidence intervals of the risk ratios can be calculated by the bootstrap method. All of the computations are simply implementable by using the R package "glmmrr." We illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method via applications to a cluster-randomized trial of the maternal and child health handbook and a longitudinal study of respiratory disease. Also, we provide simulation-based evidence for the accuracy and precision of estimation of risk ratios by the proposed method.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.