Synthetic Data-Driven Early Prediction Framework for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Receiving Vancomycin and Ceftazidime/Avibactam.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1002/phar.70064
Maryam Ramazani, Todd Brothers, Imtiaz Ahmed, Mohammad A Al-Mamun
{"title":"Synthetic Data-Driven Early Prediction Framework for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Receiving Vancomycin and Ceftazidime/Avibactam.","authors":"Maryam Ramazani, Todd Brothers, Imtiaz Ahmed, Mohammad A Al-Mamun","doi":"10.1002/phar.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nephrotoxic risks of combining ceftazidime/avibactam (AVI) with vancomycin (VAN) remain underexplored, despite both agents independently being linked to acute kidney injury (AKI). This study assessed the risk of AKI associated with concurrent VAN and ceftazidime/avibactam (VAN-AVI) therapy and developed synthetic data models to enable early prediction of AKI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis using electronic health record data from hospitalized adults between 2015 and 2022. The incidence of AKI was compared among patients receiving VAN-AVI or VAN in combination with piperacillin/tazobactam (VAN-TPZ) versus VAN monotherapy. AKI was defined as a composite of de novo and recurrent AKI (i.e., patients had a prior diagnosis of AKI within the preceding 6 months and experienced a new AKI event after 7 days of VAN-AVI initiation). To address sample size imbalance, we applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and generated synthetic datasets using Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (CTGAN) and Tabular Variational Autoencoders (TVAE). These synthetic datasets were subsequently used to augment machine learning (ML) models aimed at the early prediction of AKI in patients treated with VAN-AVI combination therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 92 patients receiving VAN-AVI combination therapy, only four (4.3%) patients experienced new-onset AKI, and 66 (71.7%) patients had a recurrent AKI. After applying IPTW, VAN-AVI was associated with a higher risk of AKI Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.47; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.97-6.11, followed by VAN-TPZ (HR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.37-2.81), compared to VAN alone. Synthetic data analyses conducted over 1000 iterations supported these findings, with mean HRs for VAN-AVI of 3.80 using TVAE and 4.45 using CTGAN. ML models augmented with synthetic data outperformed those using original data alone. For 30-day AKI prediction, F1-scores improved across all models, with the highest performance observed in the augmented XGBoost and logistic regression classifier (F1 = 0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study introduces a novel approach that integrates IPTW with synthetic data generation to evaluate drug-associated AKI risk in small-sample cohorts. Although our findings demonstrate a lower incidence of de novo AKI in the VAN-AVI group, the use of synthetic data and augmented ML models significantly improved early AKI prediction. These findings support the potential utility of synthetic data frameworks for scalable drug safety evaluations, although further validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The nephrotoxic risks of combining ceftazidime/avibactam (AVI) with vancomycin (VAN) remain underexplored, despite both agents independently being linked to acute kidney injury (AKI). This study assessed the risk of AKI associated with concurrent VAN and ceftazidime/avibactam (VAN-AVI) therapy and developed synthetic data models to enable early prediction of AKI.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using electronic health record data from hospitalized adults between 2015 and 2022. The incidence of AKI was compared among patients receiving VAN-AVI or VAN in combination with piperacillin/tazobactam (VAN-TPZ) versus VAN monotherapy. AKI was defined as a composite of de novo and recurrent AKI (i.e., patients had a prior diagnosis of AKI within the preceding 6 months and experienced a new AKI event after 7 days of VAN-AVI initiation). To address sample size imbalance, we applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and generated synthetic datasets using Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (CTGAN) and Tabular Variational Autoencoders (TVAE). These synthetic datasets were subsequently used to augment machine learning (ML) models aimed at the early prediction of AKI in patients treated with VAN-AVI combination therapy.

Results: Among the 92 patients receiving VAN-AVI combination therapy, only four (4.3%) patients experienced new-onset AKI, and 66 (71.7%) patients had a recurrent AKI. After applying IPTW, VAN-AVI was associated with a higher risk of AKI Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.47; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.97-6.11, followed by VAN-TPZ (HR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.37-2.81), compared to VAN alone. Synthetic data analyses conducted over 1000 iterations supported these findings, with mean HRs for VAN-AVI of 3.80 using TVAE and 4.45 using CTGAN. ML models augmented with synthetic data outperformed those using original data alone. For 30-day AKI prediction, F1-scores improved across all models, with the highest performance observed in the augmented XGBoost and logistic regression classifier (F1 = 0.80).

Conclusion: This study introduces a novel approach that integrates IPTW with synthetic data generation to evaluate drug-associated AKI risk in small-sample cohorts. Although our findings demonstrate a lower incidence of de novo AKI in the VAN-AVI group, the use of synthetic data and augmented ML models significantly improved early AKI prediction. These findings support the potential utility of synthetic data frameworks for scalable drug safety evaluations, although further validation is warranted.

万古霉素和头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗患者急性肾损伤的综合数据驱动早期预测框架。
背景:头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(AVI)联合万古霉素(VAN)的肾毒性风险仍未得到充分研究,尽管这两种药物都与急性肾损伤(AKI)有关。本研究评估了并发VAN和头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(VAN- avi)治疗的AKI风险,并建立了综合数据模型,以实现AKI的早期预测。方法:利用2015年至2022年住院成人的电子健康记录数据进行回顾性分析。比较了接受VAN- avi或VAN联合哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(VAN- tpz)与VAN单药治疗的患者的AKI发生率。AKI被定义为新发和复发性AKI的组合(即患者在前6个月内有AKI的诊断,并在VAN-AVI启动后7天发生新的AKI事件)。为了解决样本量失衡问题,我们应用了处理加权逆概率(IPTW),并使用条件表格生成对抗网络(CTGAN)和表格变分自编码器(TVAE)生成了合成数据集。这些合成数据集随后用于增强机器学习(ML)模型,旨在早期预测接受VAN-AVI联合治疗的患者的AKI。结果:在92例接受VAN-AVI联合治疗的患者中,只有4例(4.3%)患者出现了新发AKI, 66例(71.7%)患者出现了复发性AKI。应用IPTW后,VAN-AVI与AKI风险比(HR) = 3.47相关;95%置信区间(CI): 1.97-6.11,其次是VAN- tpz (HR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.37-2.81),与单独的VAN相比。超过1000次迭代的综合数据分析支持了这些发现,使用TVAE的VAN-AVI的平均hr为3.80,使用CTGAN的平均hr为4.45。使用合成数据增强的ML模型优于单独使用原始数据的模型。对于30天AKI预测,所有模型的F1评分都有所提高,增强XGBoost和逻辑回归分类器的性能最高(F1 = 0.80)。结论:本研究引入了一种将IPTW与合成数据生成相结合的新方法,以评估小样本队列中与药物相关的AKI风险。尽管我们的研究结果表明VAN-AVI组的新发AKI发生率较低,但合成数据和增强ML模型的使用显着提高了早期AKI预测。这些发现支持了合成数据框架在可扩展药物安全性评估中的潜在效用,尽管需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信