Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Humacyte Acellular Tissue-Engineered Vessel in a Real-World Combat Setting: A Retrospective Observational Multicenter Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shamik Parikh, Oleksandr Sokolov, Vasyl Shaprynskyi, Oleh Skupyy, Oleksandr Stanko, Serhii Yurets, Yuliya Yurkova, Maria Fadri, Laura Niklason
{"title":"Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Humacyte Acellular Tissue-Engineered Vessel in a Real-World Combat Setting: A Retrospective Observational Multicenter Study.","authors":"Shamik Parikh, Oleksandr Sokolov, Vasyl Shaprynskyi, Oleh Skupyy, Oleksandr Stanko, Serhii Yurets, Yuliya Yurkova, Maria Fadri, Laura Niklason","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral vascular trauma occurs as 10% of trauma injuries in combat settings. Its treatment in a combat setting is associated with challenges such as increased risk of infection, increased time to treatment, and lack of availability of medical personnel to perform vascular surgery. Currently, the autologous great saphenous vein or synthetic vessels such as Dacron or Gore-Tex (Teflon) are used to treat peripheral vascular trauma. Unfortunately, these options may neither be available nor advisable because of injury to the native vasculature or the increased risk of infection. Thus, an unmet medical need exists for peripheral vascular trauma among wounded military personnel. An alternative for autologous vein or synthetic vessel grafts mechanically similar to native vasculature and with increased infection resistance compared to synthetic alternatives is needed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective, observational study examines the use of the acellular tissue-engineered vessel (ATEV) for the treatment of peripheral vascular trauma in a combat setting in Ukraine. The ATEV is an acellular engineered human artery, manufactured from human vascular cells and then decellularized, generating an off-the-shelf conduit that can be immediately available for treatment of arterial injuries. A 1-year Humanitarian effort spanning from June 2022 to May 2023 treated a total of 19 patients suffering extremity arterial injuries with the ATEV in Ukraine. Retrospective data were collected for efficacy and safety outcomes in 17 of these patients, of whom 14 suffered battlefield injuries including gunshots, blast, and shrapnel-related trauma. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Humacyte ATEVs that were implanted for arterial replacement or reconstruction in patients sustaining vascular trauma, and to determine the 30-day rate of primary ATEV patency. The secondary objectives were to determine the rates of ATEV infection, amputation, mortality, and adverse events of special interest related to the ATEV, to assess ATEV durability, and to determine the 30-day limb salvage, infection free time, and patency of the human acellular vessel regardless of interventions. The hypothesis was that ATEVs would achieve similar patency, infection-free rate, limb salvage, and safety outcomes as current standards of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After up to 18 total months of data collection in 17 subjects, ATEVs patency was 87.1% (95% CI, 42.5-97.8) up to 18 months. The infection-free rate for the ATEV conduits was 100%. Limb salvage and survival rates were also 100% up to 18 months. Overall, ATEV grafts were well tolerated, with no instances of immunological rejection. In two subjects, the ATEV was abandoned: in one case because of thrombosis, and in the other because of damage to the ATEV caused by remaining shrapnel.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ATEV functioned as intended in the treatment of acute and combat-related vascular injuries. Conduit infection rate and amputations of the treated limbs were zero. Patency rates were acceptable, and losses of patency did not lead to loss of the treated limb. This study characterizes the first of its kind, cell-derived biologic engineered artery for use in civilian and military personnel who are injured during combat.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":"190 Supplement_2","pages":"288-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral vascular trauma occurs as 10% of trauma injuries in combat settings. Its treatment in a combat setting is associated with challenges such as increased risk of infection, increased time to treatment, and lack of availability of medical personnel to perform vascular surgery. Currently, the autologous great saphenous vein or synthetic vessels such as Dacron or Gore-Tex (Teflon) are used to treat peripheral vascular trauma. Unfortunately, these options may neither be available nor advisable because of injury to the native vasculature or the increased risk of infection. Thus, an unmet medical need exists for peripheral vascular trauma among wounded military personnel. An alternative for autologous vein or synthetic vessel grafts mechanically similar to native vasculature and with increased infection resistance compared to synthetic alternatives is needed.

Materials and methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study examines the use of the acellular tissue-engineered vessel (ATEV) for the treatment of peripheral vascular trauma in a combat setting in Ukraine. The ATEV is an acellular engineered human artery, manufactured from human vascular cells and then decellularized, generating an off-the-shelf conduit that can be immediately available for treatment of arterial injuries. A 1-year Humanitarian effort spanning from June 2022 to May 2023 treated a total of 19 patients suffering extremity arterial injuries with the ATEV in Ukraine. Retrospective data were collected for efficacy and safety outcomes in 17 of these patients, of whom 14 suffered battlefield injuries including gunshots, blast, and shrapnel-related trauma. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Humacyte ATEVs that were implanted for arterial replacement or reconstruction in patients sustaining vascular trauma, and to determine the 30-day rate of primary ATEV patency. The secondary objectives were to determine the rates of ATEV infection, amputation, mortality, and adverse events of special interest related to the ATEV, to assess ATEV durability, and to determine the 30-day limb salvage, infection free time, and patency of the human acellular vessel regardless of interventions. The hypothesis was that ATEVs would achieve similar patency, infection-free rate, limb salvage, and safety outcomes as current standards of care.

Results: After up to 18 total months of data collection in 17 subjects, ATEVs patency was 87.1% (95% CI, 42.5-97.8) up to 18 months. The infection-free rate for the ATEV conduits was 100%. Limb salvage and survival rates were also 100% up to 18 months. Overall, ATEV grafts were well tolerated, with no instances of immunological rejection. In two subjects, the ATEV was abandoned: in one case because of thrombosis, and in the other because of damage to the ATEV caused by remaining shrapnel.

Conclusions: ATEV functioned as intended in the treatment of acute and combat-related vascular injuries. Conduit infection rate and amputations of the treated limbs were zero. Patency rates were acceptable, and losses of patency did not lead to loss of the treated limb. This study characterizes the first of its kind, cell-derived biologic engineered artery for use in civilian and military personnel who are injured during combat.

评估Humacyte脱细胞组织工程血管在真实世界战斗环境中的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性观察性多中心研究。
简介:在战斗环境中,周围血管损伤占创伤损伤的10%。在战斗环境中对其进行治疗具有许多挑战,如感染风险增加、治疗时间延长以及缺乏进行血管手术的医务人员。目前,自体大隐静脉或合成血管如涤纶或Gore-Tex (Teflon)被用于治疗周围血管损伤。不幸的是,这些选择可能既不可行也不可取,因为损伤了原生血管或增加了感染的风险。因此,在受伤军事人员中存在未满足的外周血管创伤医疗需求。需要一种与天然血管相似的自体静脉或合成血管移植物的替代品,并且与合成替代品相比具有更强的抗感染能力。材料和方法:这项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究探讨了在乌克兰战斗环境中使用脱细胞组织工程血管(ATEV)治疗周围血管创伤。ATEV是一种非细胞工程人体动脉,由人体血管细胞制造,然后去细胞化,产生一种现成的导管,可以立即用于动脉损伤的治疗。从2022年6月到2023年5月,一项为期一年的人道主义努力在乌克兰使用ATEV治疗了19名四肢动脉损伤患者。回顾性收集了17例患者的疗效和安全性数据,其中14例患者遭受了战场伤害,包括枪击、爆炸和弹片相关创伤。本研究的主要目的是评估Humacyte ATEVs在血管损伤患者中用于动脉置换或重建的安全性和有效性,并确定30天内ATEVs的初级通畅率。次要目标是确定ATEV感染、截肢、死亡率和与ATEV相关的特殊不良事件的发生率,评估ATEV的持久性,并确定无论采取何种干预措施,30天的肢体保留、感染空闲时间和人类脱细胞血管的通畅程度。假设ATEVs将达到与当前护理标准相似的通畅、无感染率、肢体保留和安全性结果。结果:17名受试者在收集了18个月的数据后,ATEVs的18个月通畅率为87.1% (95% CI, 42.5-97.8)。ATEV导管的无感染率为100%。残肢保留率和18个月生存率均为100%。总的来说,ATEV移植物耐受性良好,没有出现免疫排斥反应。有两名受试者放弃了ATEV:一名患者是因为血栓形成,另一名患者是因为剩余弹片对ATEV造成损伤。结论:ATEV在急性和战斗相关血管损伤的治疗中发挥了预期的作用。治疗肢体的导管感染率和截肢率均为零。通畅率是可以接受的,并且通畅的丧失不会导致被治疗肢体的丧失。这项研究首次将细胞衍生的生物工程动脉用于在战斗中受伤的平民和军事人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信