Post-Total-Pancreatectomy-Hemorrhage (PTPH) - approaching a new definition.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Lea Timmermann, Richard Schensar, Federico Storni, Johann Pratschke, Thomas Malinka
{"title":"Post-Total-Pancreatectomy-Hemorrhage (PTPH) - approaching a new definition.","authors":"Lea Timmermann, Richard Schensar, Federico Storni, Johann Pratschke, Thomas Malinka","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03869-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Postoperative hemorrhagic complications in pancreatic surgery are classified according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). However, following total pancreatectomy, the predominant bleeding causes associated with pancreatic fistula or insufficiency of the pancreatico-enteric anastomosis are eliminated. The objective of this study is to examine bleeding sources following total pancreatectomy, and propose a novel classification, termed Post-Total Pancreatectomy Hemorrhage (PTPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An overall of 195 patients was included and reviewed for baseline characteristics, comorbidities, intraoperative findings, perioperative coagulation profiles, and postoperative courses. Applicability of the ISGPS classification to PTPH was critically assessed with respect to the existing criteria: timely onset, location and cause, and severity. Subgroups were defined with regard to bleeding sources including erosion, surgical, gastrointestinal, and diffuse bleeding. Furthermore, we developed a severity index to enhance objectivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five of the patients experienced hemorrhagic complications. Timely onset and our severity index corresponded significantly with the bleeding source.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ISGPS classification, although widely utilized in pancreatic surgery, does not fully account for the bleeding complications associated with total pancreatectomy. Our proposed classification for PTPH introduces a more granular and clinically relevant framework, with clearly delineated subgroups based on source, and an innovative severity index.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03869-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Postoperative hemorrhagic complications in pancreatic surgery are classified according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). However, following total pancreatectomy, the predominant bleeding causes associated with pancreatic fistula or insufficiency of the pancreatico-enteric anastomosis are eliminated. The objective of this study is to examine bleeding sources following total pancreatectomy, and propose a novel classification, termed Post-Total Pancreatectomy Hemorrhage (PTPH).

Methods: An overall of 195 patients was included and reviewed for baseline characteristics, comorbidities, intraoperative findings, perioperative coagulation profiles, and postoperative courses. Applicability of the ISGPS classification to PTPH was critically assessed with respect to the existing criteria: timely onset, location and cause, and severity. Subgroups were defined with regard to bleeding sources including erosion, surgical, gastrointestinal, and diffuse bleeding. Furthermore, we developed a severity index to enhance objectivity.

Results: Thirty-five of the patients experienced hemorrhagic complications. Timely onset and our severity index corresponded significantly with the bleeding source.

Conclusion: The ISGPS classification, although widely utilized in pancreatic surgery, does not fully account for the bleeding complications associated with total pancreatectomy. Our proposed classification for PTPH introduces a more granular and clinically relevant framework, with clearly delineated subgroups based on source, and an innovative severity index.

全胰切除术后出血(PTPH)——接近一个新的定义。
目的:根据国际胰腺外科研究小组(ISGPS)对胰腺手术术后出血性并发症进行分类。然而,全胰切除术后,与胰瘘或胰肠吻合不全相关的主要出血原因被消除。本研究的目的是检查全胰腺切除术后出血的来源,并提出一种新的分类,称为全胰腺切除术后出血(PTPH)。方法:共纳入195例患者,并对基线特征、合并症、术中发现、围术期凝血情况和术后病程进行了回顾。ISGPS分类对PTPH的适用性根据现有标准进行了严格评估:及时发病、位置和原因以及严重程度。根据出血来源定义亚组,包括糜烂、外科、胃肠和弥漫性出血。此外,我们开发了一个严重性指数,以提高客观性。结果:35例患者出现出血性并发症。及时发病和我们的严重程度指数与出血来源有显著的相关性。结论:ISGPS分类虽然广泛应用于胰腺手术,但不能完全解释全胰切除术相关的出血并发症。我们提出的PTPH分类引入了一个更细粒度和临床相关的框架,根据来源明确划分亚组,以及一个创新的严重程度指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信