Acute Pioglitazone Intoxication in Rats: Lack of Protective Effect of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion-A Pilot Study.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Abdullah Tasci, Ecem Deniz Kirkpantur Tasci, Cansu Arslan Turan, Tuba Cimilli Ozturk
{"title":"Acute Pioglitazone Intoxication in Rats: Lack of Protective Effect of Intravenous Lipid Emulsion-A Pilot Study.","authors":"Abdullah Tasci, Ecem Deniz Kirkpantur Tasci, Cansu Arslan Turan, Tuba Cimilli Ozturk","doi":"10.1002/jat.4939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) is an established antidote for local anesthetic systemic toxicity and has been tested in various lipophilic drug intoxications, but its efficacy in pioglitazone toxicity remains unclear. This study evaluated the biochemical and histopathological effects of pioglitazone and the potential protective role of ILE in an animal model. Thirty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 8): control, ILE (12.4 mL/kg, 20% IV), pioglitazone (PIO; ½ LD<sub>50</sub>, 1000 mg/kg), and PIO + ILE. ILE (or saline) was administered intravenously over ~2 min immediately after pioglitazone, with matched volume and duration. Animals were observed for 24 h with free access to food and water. At 24 h, rats were decapitated, and blood and tissue samples were analyzed. Pioglitazone induced significant hepatic and renal injury (both p < 0.001), while cardiac changes were minimal and nonsignificant. ILE administration did not reduce liver or kidney injury. The ILE-only group showed higher renal injury versus controls (p < 0.001). Serum biochemistry revealed increased BUN and creatinine in PIO + ILE compared with Control and ILE (adjusted p < 0.05), with no difference between PIO and PIO + ILE. ILE failed to reverse hepatic or renal injury in acute pioglitazone toxicity and was associated with potential nephrotoxic effects. These findings suggest limited utility of ILE for pioglitazone overdose, likely reflecting drug physicochemical properties (moderate lipophilicity and high protein binding) and timing/dosing constraints. Caution is warranted, particularly regarding renal effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4939","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) is an established antidote for local anesthetic systemic toxicity and has been tested in various lipophilic drug intoxications, but its efficacy in pioglitazone toxicity remains unclear. This study evaluated the biochemical and histopathological effects of pioglitazone and the potential protective role of ILE in an animal model. Thirty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 8): control, ILE (12.4 mL/kg, 20% IV), pioglitazone (PIO; ½ LD50, 1000 mg/kg), and PIO + ILE. ILE (or saline) was administered intravenously over ~2 min immediately after pioglitazone, with matched volume and duration. Animals were observed for 24 h with free access to food and water. At 24 h, rats were decapitated, and blood and tissue samples were analyzed. Pioglitazone induced significant hepatic and renal injury (both p < 0.001), while cardiac changes were minimal and nonsignificant. ILE administration did not reduce liver or kidney injury. The ILE-only group showed higher renal injury versus controls (p < 0.001). Serum biochemistry revealed increased BUN and creatinine in PIO + ILE compared with Control and ILE (adjusted p < 0.05), with no difference between PIO and PIO + ILE. ILE failed to reverse hepatic or renal injury in acute pioglitazone toxicity and was associated with potential nephrotoxic effects. These findings suggest limited utility of ILE for pioglitazone overdose, likely reflecting drug physicochemical properties (moderate lipophilicity and high protein binding) and timing/dosing constraints. Caution is warranted, particularly regarding renal effects.

大鼠急性吡格列酮中毒:静脉注射脂质乳缺乏保护作用的初步研究。
静脉脂质乳(ILE)是一种公认的局部麻醉全身毒性解毒剂,并已在各种亲脂性药物中毒中进行了试验,但其对吡格列酮毒性的疗效尚不清楚。本研究在动物模型中评估了吡格列酮的生化和组织病理学作用以及ILE的潜在保护作用。将32只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠随机分为4组(n = 8):对照组、ILE (12.4 mL/kg, 20% IV)、吡格列酮(PIO;½LD50, 1000 mg/kg)和PIO + ILE。吡格列酮后立即静脉注射ILE(或生理盐水)2分钟,剂量和持续时间相匹配。观察动物24 h,自由进食和饮水。24 h,取大鼠头颅,分析血液和组织样本。吡格列酮引起明显的肝和肾损伤(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
145
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed original reviews and hypothesis-driven research articles on mechanistic, fundamental and applied research relating to the toxicity of drugs and chemicals at the molecular, cellular, tissue, target organ and whole body level in vivo (by all relevant routes of exposure) and in vitro / ex vivo. All aspects of toxicology are covered (including but not limited to nanotoxicology, genomics and proteomics, teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, reproductive and endocrine toxicology, toxicopathology, target organ toxicity, systems toxicity (eg immunotoxicity), neurobehavioral toxicology, mechanistic studies, biochemical and molecular toxicology, novel biomarkers, pharmacokinetics/PBPK, risk assessment and environmental health studies) and emphasis is given to papers of clear application to human health, and/or advance mechanistic understanding and/or provide significant contributions and impact to their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信