{"title":"Quantitative C-reactive protein for differentiating tuberculous and malignant pleural effusion: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Narayan Prakash Sharma, Ranjan Sapkota, Prajjwol Luitel, Roshan Shrestha","doi":"10.1007/s12055-025-01978-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulmonary or pleural tuberculosis and malignancy are the most common causes of lymphocyte-rich pleural effusion. In resource-limited settings, establishing a definitive diagnosis for patients with pleural effusion (PEs) may be challenging, emphasizing the need for a simple diagnostic test. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of quantitative C-reactive protein (qCRP) for differentiating between tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed on 81 patients admitted for lymphocyte-rich exudative pleural effusion at a tertiary care center. Comprehensive biochemical analyses, including qCRP levels in the pleural fluid and pathological examinations of blood, pleural fluid, and/or tissue, were performed. The t-test was used for continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. To assess the independent associations between variables, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The diagnostic performance of pleural fluid qCRP levels was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four (54.3%) patients were diagnosed with TPE and 34 (42.0%) with MPE. The qCRP levels in the pleural fluid were significantly greater in the TPE group than in the MPE group (55.5 ± 45.9 mg/L vs. 18.6 ± 19.1 mg/L, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The cutoff value for pleural fluid CRP levels (≥ 24.1 mg/L) yielded a sensitivity of 65.9% and a specificity of 73.5% in predicting TPE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pleural fluid qCRP is a simple, rapid, cost-effective diagnostic tool for differentiating tuberculous from malignant etiology in patients with lymphocyte-rich exudative pleural effusion.</p><p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-025-01978-9.</p>","PeriodicalId":13285,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"41 10","pages":"1425-1431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-025-01978-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Pulmonary or pleural tuberculosis and malignancy are the most common causes of lymphocyte-rich pleural effusion. In resource-limited settings, establishing a definitive diagnosis for patients with pleural effusion (PEs) may be challenging, emphasizing the need for a simple diagnostic test. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of quantitative C-reactive protein (qCRP) for differentiating between tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE).
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on 81 patients admitted for lymphocyte-rich exudative pleural effusion at a tertiary care center. Comprehensive biochemical analyses, including qCRP levels in the pleural fluid and pathological examinations of blood, pleural fluid, and/or tissue, were performed. The t-test was used for continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. To assess the independent associations between variables, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The diagnostic performance of pleural fluid qCRP levels was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results: Forty-four (54.3%) patients were diagnosed with TPE and 34 (42.0%) with MPE. The qCRP levels in the pleural fluid were significantly greater in the TPE group than in the MPE group (55.5 ± 45.9 mg/L vs. 18.6 ± 19.1 mg/L, P < 0.001). The cutoff value for pleural fluid CRP levels (≥ 24.1 mg/L) yielded a sensitivity of 65.9% and a specificity of 73.5% in predicting TPE.
Conclusions: Pleural fluid qCRP is a simple, rapid, cost-effective diagnostic tool for differentiating tuberculous from malignant etiology in patients with lymphocyte-rich exudative pleural effusion.
Graphical abstract:
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-025-01978-9.
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of the Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is education. The journal aims to dissipate current clinical practices and developments in the area of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. This includes information on cardiovascular epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, clinical manifestation etc. The journal accepts manuscripts from cardiovascular anaesthesia, cardiothoracic and vascular nursing and technology development and new/innovative products.The journal is the official publication of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons which has a membership of over 1000 at present.DescriptionThe journal is the official organ of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons. It was started in 1982 by Dr. Solomon Victor and ws being published twice a year up to 1996. From 2000 the editorial office moved to Delhi. From 2001 the journal was extended to quarterly and subsequently four issues annually have been printed out at time and regularly without fail. The journal receives manuscripts from members and non-members and cardiovascular surgeons. The manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two or sometimes three or four reviewers who are on the panel. The manuscript process is now completely online. Funding the journal comes partially from the organization and from revenue generated by subscription and advertisement.