Monia Marchetti, Paolo Corradini, Luca Arcaini, Stefania Bramanti, Alice Di Rocco, Marco Ladetto, Stefano Luminari, Luigi Rigacci, Pier Luigi Zinzani
{"title":"A SWOT-Consensus for CAR-T in Follicular Lymphoma: Fine Tuning of Patient Journey and Selection","authors":"Monia Marchetti, Paolo Corradini, Luca Arcaini, Stefania Bramanti, Alice Di Rocco, Marco Ladetto, Stefano Luminari, Luigi Rigacci, Pier Luigi Zinzani","doi":"10.1002/hon.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past 2 decades, advancements in follicular lymphoma (FL) treatment, particularly with anti-CD20 antibodies, have significantly improved patient survival. However, a subset of FL patients experiences early relapse and progression within 24 months (POD24) after first line treatment, which is a sign of poor prognosis. Current guidelines recommend various second-line treatments, but there is no consensus on an optimal treatment sequence for relapsed/refractory (r/r) FL. Moreover, despite available treatments, reduced survival after second-line therapies and diminishing responses with each relapse highlight the unmet need for more effective options. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for r/r FL beyond 2<sup>nd</sup> line therapy, with three FDA/EMA-approved therapies (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel) showing high efficacy and manageable side effects. However, challenges remain in determining which patients will benefit most from CAR-T, especially given its high cost, safety concerns, and logistical barriers. A consensus study was conducted to guide CAR-T patient selection and treatment sequencing for patients in 3rd line or beyond. Key findings suggest that younger patients, those with high disease burden or poor first-line responses, should be prioritized for CAR-T. Additionally, CAR-T is recommended as a third-line option for patients with POD24, double refractoriness (failure to respond to two subsequent lines of immunochemotherapy), or early autologous stem cell transplant failure. The study underscores the importance of early assessment of treatment response, careful second-line therapy selection, and patient adherence to ensure optimal outcomes. The results, based on expert consensus, support CAR-T therapy as a viable option for r/r FL patients, offering hope for durable remissions in this challenging cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, advancements in follicular lymphoma (FL) treatment, particularly with anti-CD20 antibodies, have significantly improved patient survival. However, a subset of FL patients experiences early relapse and progression within 24 months (POD24) after first line treatment, which is a sign of poor prognosis. Current guidelines recommend various second-line treatments, but there is no consensus on an optimal treatment sequence for relapsed/refractory (r/r) FL. Moreover, despite available treatments, reduced survival after second-line therapies and diminishing responses with each relapse highlight the unmet need for more effective options. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for r/r FL beyond 2nd line therapy, with three FDA/EMA-approved therapies (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel) showing high efficacy and manageable side effects. However, challenges remain in determining which patients will benefit most from CAR-T, especially given its high cost, safety concerns, and logistical barriers. A consensus study was conducted to guide CAR-T patient selection and treatment sequencing for patients in 3rd line or beyond. Key findings suggest that younger patients, those with high disease burden or poor first-line responses, should be prioritized for CAR-T. Additionally, CAR-T is recommended as a third-line option for patients with POD24, double refractoriness (failure to respond to two subsequent lines of immunochemotherapy), or early autologous stem cell transplant failure. The study underscores the importance of early assessment of treatment response, careful second-line therapy selection, and patient adherence to ensure optimal outcomes. The results, based on expert consensus, support CAR-T therapy as a viable option for r/r FL patients, offering hope for durable remissions in this challenging cohort.
期刊介绍:
Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged:
-Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders
-Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays
-Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases
-Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies
-Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems.
Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.