Using Nutrition to Improve Time in rangE (UNITE): A Randomized Clinical Trial with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People with Type 2 Diabetes Not Taking Insulin.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Holly J Willis, Sally K Gustafson, Elizabeth Johnson, Meghan M JaKa, Richard M Bergenstal
{"title":"Using Nutrition to Improve Time in rangE (UNITE): A Randomized Clinical Trial with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in People with Type 2 Diabetes Not Taking Insulin.","authors":"Holly J Willis, Sally K Gustafson, Elizabeth Johnson, Meghan M JaKa, Richard M Bergenstal","doi":"10.1177/15209156251377799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Preliminary research suggests that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can be used to guide food and lifestyle choices. The objective of the Using Nutrition to Improve Time in rangE (UNITE) study was to compare the glycemic and dietary impact of using either a nutrition-focused approach (NFA) or a self-directed approach (SDA) during CGM initiation in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) not on insulin. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> UNITE was a 60-day, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. The NFA arm was designed to help participants use CGM data to guide evidenced-based food choices to improve percent time in range with glucose 70-180 mg/dL (TIR70-180) and diet quality, whereas the SDA arm was designed to guide participants to use CGM data in any way that felt useful to them. Changes in outcomes from baseline (Base) to postintervention (Post) were estimated by arm and compared between arms using difference-in-differences; analyses were limited to those with adequate CGM data at Base and Post. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Adults (NFA: <i>N</i> = 64, SDA: <i>N</i> = 60) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 65.0 (10.3) years, T2D duration of 10.7 (6.5) years, and HbA1c of 7.9% (0.7) participated. There was no differential change in TIR70-180 between arms (<i>P</i> = 0.14), but both arms improved from Base to Post (NFA: 46%-71%, SDA: 55%-71%; within-arm differences both <i>P</i> < 0.001). Time with glucose >250 mg/dL decreased more from Base to Post in the NFA versus the SDA (-14% versus -6%; differential change <i>P</i> = 0.047). NFA participants had several minor, but significant, within-arm changes in dietary intake, and the NFA arm reported significantly more confidence using CGM data than the SDA arm (<i>P</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Changes in mean TIR70-180 did not differ between the NFA and SDA arms; however, both arms experienced significant within-arm improvements, which support the use of CGM to improve glycemia in people with T2D not on insulin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251377799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preliminary research suggests that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can be used to guide food and lifestyle choices. The objective of the Using Nutrition to Improve Time in rangE (UNITE) study was to compare the glycemic and dietary impact of using either a nutrition-focused approach (NFA) or a self-directed approach (SDA) during CGM initiation in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) not on insulin. Methods: UNITE was a 60-day, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. The NFA arm was designed to help participants use CGM data to guide evidenced-based food choices to improve percent time in range with glucose 70-180 mg/dL (TIR70-180) and diet quality, whereas the SDA arm was designed to guide participants to use CGM data in any way that felt useful to them. Changes in outcomes from baseline (Base) to postintervention (Post) were estimated by arm and compared between arms using difference-in-differences; analyses were limited to those with adequate CGM data at Base and Post. Results: Adults (NFA: N = 64, SDA: N = 60) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 65.0 (10.3) years, T2D duration of 10.7 (6.5) years, and HbA1c of 7.9% (0.7) participated. There was no differential change in TIR70-180 between arms (P = 0.14), but both arms improved from Base to Post (NFA: 46%-71%, SDA: 55%-71%; within-arm differences both P < 0.001). Time with glucose >250 mg/dL decreased more from Base to Post in the NFA versus the SDA (-14% versus -6%; differential change P = 0.047). NFA participants had several minor, but significant, within-arm changes in dietary intake, and the NFA arm reported significantly more confidence using CGM data than the SDA arm (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Changes in mean TIR70-180 did not differ between the NFA and SDA arms; however, both arms experienced significant within-arm improvements, which support the use of CGM to improve glycemia in people with T2D not on insulin.

使用营养改善时间范围(UNITE):一项随机临床试验,连续监测2型糖尿病患者不使用胰岛素。
简介:初步研究表明,连续血糖监测(CGM)可用于指导饮食和生活方式的选择。使用营养改善范围内时间(UNITE)研究的目的是比较在非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病(T2D)患者CGM启动期间,使用营养聚焦方法(NFA)或自我指导方法(SDA)对血糖和饮食的影响。方法:UNITE是一项为期60天的两组随机临床试验。NFA组旨在帮助参与者使用CGM数据来指导基于证据的食物选择,以提高葡萄糖70-180 mg/dL (TIR70-180)范围内的百分比时间和饮食质量,而SDA组旨在指导参与者以任何对他们有用的方式使用CGM数据。从基线(Base)到干预后(Post)的结局变化以组为单位进行估计,并采用差异中差异法对组间结果进行比较;分析仅限于在基地和基地有足够的CGM数据的国家。结果:参与研究的成人(NFA: N = 64, SDA: N = 60),平均(标准差)年龄为65.0(10.3)岁,T2D持续时间为10.7(6.5)年,HbA1c为7.9%(0.7)。两组间TIR70-180无差异变化(P = 0.14),但两组从基线到后均有所改善(NFA: 46%-71%, SDA: 55%-71%;组内差异均P < 0.001)。与SDA相比,NFA组葡萄糖浓度为250 mg/dL的时间从基础到后减少更多(-14%对-6%,差异变化P = 0.047)。NFA参与者在饮食摄入方面有几个较小但显著的组内变化,NFA组使用CGM数据报告的信心明显高于SDA组(P < 0.05)。结论:平均TIR70-180的变化在NFA组和SDA组之间没有差异;然而,两组均经历了显著的组内改善,这支持使用CGM改善未使用胰岛素的T2D患者的血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信