Oxytocin restores context-specific hyperaltruistic preference.

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
eLife Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI:10.7554/eLife.102756
Hong Zhang, Yinmei Ni, Jian Li
{"title":"Oxytocin restores context-specific hyperaltruistic preference.","authors":"Hong Zhang, Yinmei Ni, Jian Li","doi":"10.7554/eLife.102756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advances in moral decision-making research show people are hyperaltruistic by being more willing to sacrifice monetary gains to spare others from suffering than to spare themselves. Yet other studies indicate an opposite egoistic bias: subjects are less willing to harm themselves for others' benefits than for their own. These results underscore the complexities of moral decisions and demand a mechanistic explanation for hyperaltruistic preferences. We investigated hyperaltruism using trade-off choices combining monetary gains and painful electric shocks and choices combining monetary losses and shocks. Study 1 revealed that switching the decision context from gains to losses effectively eliminated the hyperaltruistic preference, accompanied by the altered relationship between subjects' instrumental harm (IH) trait attitudes and relative pain sensitivities. In the pre-registered study 2, we found that oxytocin, a neuropeptide linked to parochial altruism, restored the context-dependent hyperaltruistic preference. Furthermore, oxytocin increased the degree to which subjects framed the task as harming others, which mediated the correlation between IH and relative pain sensitivities. Thus, the loss decision context and oxytocin diminished and restored the mediation effect of subjective harm framing, respectively. Our results help elucidate the psychological processes underpinning the contextual specificity of hyperaltruism and carry implications in promoting prosocial interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.102756","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in moral decision-making research show people are hyperaltruistic by being more willing to sacrifice monetary gains to spare others from suffering than to spare themselves. Yet other studies indicate an opposite egoistic bias: subjects are less willing to harm themselves for others' benefits than for their own. These results underscore the complexities of moral decisions and demand a mechanistic explanation for hyperaltruistic preferences. We investigated hyperaltruism using trade-off choices combining monetary gains and painful electric shocks and choices combining monetary losses and shocks. Study 1 revealed that switching the decision context from gains to losses effectively eliminated the hyperaltruistic preference, accompanied by the altered relationship between subjects' instrumental harm (IH) trait attitudes and relative pain sensitivities. In the pre-registered study 2, we found that oxytocin, a neuropeptide linked to parochial altruism, restored the context-dependent hyperaltruistic preference. Furthermore, oxytocin increased the degree to which subjects framed the task as harming others, which mediated the correlation between IH and relative pain sensitivities. Thus, the loss decision context and oxytocin diminished and restored the mediation effect of subjective harm framing, respectively. Our results help elucidate the psychological processes underpinning the contextual specificity of hyperaltruism and carry implications in promoting prosocial interactions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

催产素恢复情境特定的超利他主义偏好。
道德决策研究的最新进展表明,人们更愿意牺牲金钱利益来让别人免受痛苦,而不是让自己免受痛苦,这是极度利他主义的。然而,其他研究表明了相反的利己主义偏见:受试者不太愿意为了他人的利益而伤害自己,而是为了自己的利益。这些结果强调了道德决策的复杂性,并要求对超利他偏好进行机械解释。我们通过权衡选择将金钱收益和痛苦电击结合起来,以及选择将金钱损失和电击结合起来来研究超利他主义。研究1显示,将决策情境从得失转换为得失,可以有效地消除超利他偏好,并改变被试的工具伤害(instrumental harm, IH)特质态度与相对疼痛敏感性之间的关系。在预先注册的研究2中,我们发现催产素,一种与狭隘利他主义有关的神经肽,恢复了情境依赖的超利他主义偏好。此外,催产素增加了受试者将任务视为伤害他人的程度,这介导了IH和相对疼痛敏感性之间的相关性。因此,损失决策情境和催产素分别减弱和恢复了主观伤害框架的中介作用。我们的研究结果有助于阐明支撑超利他主义情境特异性的心理过程,并对促进亲社会互动具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eLife
eLife BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
3122
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as: Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings. Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article. Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research. Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field. Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles. Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信