Ultrasound guided paravertebral ozone-oxygen injection versus pure oxygen for chronic discogenic low back pain: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Bijan Forogh, Kamyar Kazemi
{"title":"Ultrasound guided paravertebral ozone-oxygen injection versus pure oxygen for chronic discogenic low back pain: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Bijan Forogh, Kamyar Kazemi","doi":"10.1177/10538127251379512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveChronic discogenic low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorders. Despite numerous studies, the effectiveness of paraspinal ozone therapy continues to be uncertain, partly because of the methodological shortcomings. This study evaluates the effectiveness of para-spinal ozone-oxygen mixture injection compared to pure oxygen in chronic discogenic low back pain.DesignIn this double-blind RCT, 30 patients with MRI-confirmed chronic discogenic LBP were randomized into intervention (20 μg/mL ozone-oxygen mixture) or control (pure oxygen) groups. Every patient underwent a series of three ultrasound-guided para-spinal injections administered weekly in combination with exercise. Pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and functional status (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) were assessed at baseline, one month, and three months post-intervention.ResultsBoth groups exhibited notable enhancements in VAS and ODI scores; however, the ozone group revealed more favorable results (P < 0.001). The ozone group exhibited significantly higher mean reductions in VAS (5.6 compared to 2.4) and ODI (19.07 compared to 7.8). (P < 0.001)ConclusionPara-spinal ozone-oxygen injection was significantly superior to pure oxygen in alleviating pain and enhancing functional scores. Despite limitations such as a small sample size, this research offers insights into ozone therapy as a promising minimally invasive alternative for chronic discogenic low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251379512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251379512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveChronic discogenic low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorders. Despite numerous studies, the effectiveness of paraspinal ozone therapy continues to be uncertain, partly because of the methodological shortcomings. This study evaluates the effectiveness of para-spinal ozone-oxygen mixture injection compared to pure oxygen in chronic discogenic low back pain.DesignIn this double-blind RCT, 30 patients with MRI-confirmed chronic discogenic LBP were randomized into intervention (20 μg/mL ozone-oxygen mixture) or control (pure oxygen) groups. Every patient underwent a series of three ultrasound-guided para-spinal injections administered weekly in combination with exercise. Pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) and functional status (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) were assessed at baseline, one month, and three months post-intervention.ResultsBoth groups exhibited notable enhancements in VAS and ODI scores; however, the ozone group revealed more favorable results (P < 0.001). The ozone group exhibited significantly higher mean reductions in VAS (5.6 compared to 2.4) and ODI (19.07 compared to 7.8). (P < 0.001)ConclusionPara-spinal ozone-oxygen injection was significantly superior to pure oxygen in alleviating pain and enhancing functional scores. Despite limitations such as a small sample size, this research offers insights into ozone therapy as a promising minimally invasive alternative for chronic discogenic low back pain.

超声引导下椎旁臭氧注射与纯氧治疗慢性椎间盘源性腰痛:一项双盲随机对照试验。
目的慢性椎间盘源性腰痛(LBP)是最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病之一。尽管有大量的研究,椎管旁臭氧治疗的有效性仍然是不确定的,部分原因是方法上的缺点。本研究评估了与纯氧相比,脊髓旁臭氧-氧混合注射治疗慢性椎间盘源性腰痛的有效性。设计本双盲随机对照试验将30例mri确诊的慢性盘源性腰痛患者随机分为干预组(20 μg/mL臭氧-氧气混合物)和对照组(纯氧)。每位患者每周接受三次超声引导下的脊髓旁注射,同时进行锻炼。疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表,VAS)和功能状态(Oswestry残疾指数,ODI)分别在基线、干预后1个月和3个月进行评估。结果两组患者VAS、ODI评分均有显著提高;然而,臭氧组显示出更有利的结果(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信