Safe and effective genomic medicine implementation in hospitals: a scoping review.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Luisa Clucas, Cate Kelly, Trang Thu Do, Inez Beadell, Belinda Dawson-McClaren, Clara L Gaff
{"title":"Safe and effective genomic medicine implementation in hospitals: a scoping review.","authors":"Luisa Clucas, Cate Kelly, Trang Thu Do, Inez Beadell, Belinda Dawson-McClaren, Clara L Gaff","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genomic medicine is rapidly changing routine clinical care in a range of specialties. Effective clinical governance is essential for safe implementation of emerging clinical practice, including genomic medicine. Frameworks exist for national implementation of genomics but lack the granularity needed by hospitals to guide local implementation of national policy.We aimed to identify if a framework suitable to support the safe, effective implementation and use of genomic medicine at a hospital level exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search using scoping review methodology was performed, searching three databases (Medline, Embase and PubMed), from 2009 to 2022, to identify structured approaches to the clinical governance of genomics at a meso (hospital/hospital consortia) level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No frameworks were identified that provided a holistic clinical governance approach to hospital-level implementation of genomics. Eight publications included components relevant to the implementation of genomics. While the clinical governance components included in the eight publications varied, all identified one or more of the following as important to effective implementation: optimal leadership of genomic care; ensuring an effective workforce; ensuring safe, effective clinical practice; the importance of quality metrics and the criticality of consumer partnerships. No publication explicitly discussed risk management, but all identified processes which would serve to minimise risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Institutional-level change is essential for the implementation of genomic medicine throughout a health system. Yet, there is a lack of evidence-based frameworks to support integrated clinical governance of genomic medicine and its implementation by hospitals and their executive leaders. Our results can contribute to the design of an approach which supports hospital planning and decision-making by integrating all elements of clinical governance. Without this, implementation will be piecemeal, access to genomic medicine across a health system inequitable, and patients may receive inefficient, ineffective, slow and potentially unsafe care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Genomic medicine is rapidly changing routine clinical care in a range of specialties. Effective clinical governance is essential for safe implementation of emerging clinical practice, including genomic medicine. Frameworks exist for national implementation of genomics but lack the granularity needed by hospitals to guide local implementation of national policy.We aimed to identify if a framework suitable to support the safe, effective implementation and use of genomic medicine at a hospital level exists.

Methods: A systematic search using scoping review methodology was performed, searching three databases (Medline, Embase and PubMed), from 2009 to 2022, to identify structured approaches to the clinical governance of genomics at a meso (hospital/hospital consortia) level.

Results: No frameworks were identified that provided a holistic clinical governance approach to hospital-level implementation of genomics. Eight publications included components relevant to the implementation of genomics. While the clinical governance components included in the eight publications varied, all identified one or more of the following as important to effective implementation: optimal leadership of genomic care; ensuring an effective workforce; ensuring safe, effective clinical practice; the importance of quality metrics and the criticality of consumer partnerships. No publication explicitly discussed risk management, but all identified processes which would serve to minimise risk.

Conclusions: Institutional-level change is essential for the implementation of genomic medicine throughout a health system. Yet, there is a lack of evidence-based frameworks to support integrated clinical governance of genomic medicine and its implementation by hospitals and their executive leaders. Our results can contribute to the design of an approach which supports hospital planning and decision-making by integrating all elements of clinical governance. Without this, implementation will be piecemeal, access to genomic medicine across a health system inequitable, and patients may receive inefficient, ineffective, slow and potentially unsafe care.

安全有效的基因组医学在医院的实施:范围审查。
背景:基因组医学正在迅速改变一系列专业的常规临床护理。有效的临床治理对于安全实施包括基因组医学在内的新兴临床实践至关重要。国家实施基因组学的框架已经存在,但缺乏医院指导地方实施国家政策所需的粒度。我们的目的是确定是否存在一个框架,以支持在医院一级安全、有效地实施和使用基因组医学。方法:从2009年到2022年,使用范围审查方法对三个数据库(Medline、Embase和PubMed)进行了系统搜索,以确定中观(医院/医院联盟)水平基因组学临床治理的结构化方法。结果:没有确定框架,为医院层面的基因组学实施提供全面的临床治理方法。八份出版物包括与基因组学实施相关的内容。虽然八篇出版物中包含的临床治理组成部分各不相同,但都确定了以下一个或多个对有效实施很重要:基因组护理的最佳领导;确保有效的员工队伍;确保安全、有效的临床实践;质量指标的重要性和消费者伙伴关系的重要性。没有出版物明确讨论风险管理,但所有出版物都确定了有助于将风险降到最低的过程。结论:制度层面的变革对于在整个卫生系统中实施基因组医学至关重要。然而,缺乏以证据为基础的框架来支持基因组医学的综合临床治理以及医院及其行政领导的实施。我们的研究结果有助于设计一种方法,通过整合临床治理的所有要素来支持医院的规划和决策。如果不这样做,实施将是零敲碎打的,整个卫生系统获得基因组医学的机会将是不公平的,患者可能会得到低效、无效、缓慢和可能不安全的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信