Clinical and data-driven optimization of Genomiser for rare disease patients: experience from the Hong Kong Genome Project.

IF 7.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Anson Man Chun Xi, Denis Long Him Yeung, Wei Ma, Dingge Ying, Amy Hin Yan Tong, Dicky Or, Shirley Pik Ying Hue, Hong Kong Genome Project, Annie Tsz-Wai Chu, Brian Hon-Yin Chung
{"title":"Clinical and data-driven optimization of Genomiser for rare disease patients: experience from the Hong Kong Genome Project.","authors":"Anson Man Chun Xi, Denis Long Him Yeung, Wei Ma, Dingge Ying, Amy Hin Yan Tong, Dicky Or, Shirley Pik Ying Hue, Hong Kong Genome Project, Annie Tsz-Wai Chu, Brian Hon-Yin Chung","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbaf475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomiser is a phenotype-driven tool that prioritizes coding and non-coding variants by relevance in rare disease diagnosis; yet comprehensive evaluation of its performance on real-life whole genome sequencing data is lacking. The Hong Kong Genome Project had initially incorporated Exomiser in the diagnostic pipeline. This study evaluated the feasibility of upgrading from Exomiser to Genomiser with three modifications: extension of the interval filter to include ±2000 bp from transcript boundaries, adjusting minor allele frequency (MAF) filter to 3%, and the inclusion of SpliceAI. A total of 985 patients with disclosed whole genome sequencing test results were included in this study, of which 207 positive cases (14 attributed to non-coding variants) were used for Genomiser parameter optimization by means of sensitivity evaluation. Under the default parameter setting, Genomiser achieved lower sensitivity compared to Exomiser (70.15% vs. 72.14%, top-3 candidates; 74.63% vs. 80.60%, top-5 candidates). Further investigation noted that this was attributed to non-coding variant noise influenced by Regulatory Mendelian Mutation (ReMM) scoring metrics. This issue was mitigated when a previously optimized ReMM score was applied as a filtering cut-off (ReMM = 0.963), improving Genomiser's sensitivity (92.54% vs. 89.55%, top-15 candidates). We further evaluated the optimized parameter in a cohort of 778 negative cases and detected 20 non-coding variants (2.6% added yield), with 5 validated to be disease-causing. Our proposed approach adheres to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology and ClinGen variant interpretation guidelines to ensure interpretable results and integrates non-coding variant analysis into clinical pipelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genomiser is a phenotype-driven tool that prioritizes coding and non-coding variants by relevance in rare disease diagnosis; yet comprehensive evaluation of its performance on real-life whole genome sequencing data is lacking. The Hong Kong Genome Project had initially incorporated Exomiser in the diagnostic pipeline. This study evaluated the feasibility of upgrading from Exomiser to Genomiser with three modifications: extension of the interval filter to include ±2000 bp from transcript boundaries, adjusting minor allele frequency (MAF) filter to 3%, and the inclusion of SpliceAI. A total of 985 patients with disclosed whole genome sequencing test results were included in this study, of which 207 positive cases (14 attributed to non-coding variants) were used for Genomiser parameter optimization by means of sensitivity evaluation. Under the default parameter setting, Genomiser achieved lower sensitivity compared to Exomiser (70.15% vs. 72.14%, top-3 candidates; 74.63% vs. 80.60%, top-5 candidates). Further investigation noted that this was attributed to non-coding variant noise influenced by Regulatory Mendelian Mutation (ReMM) scoring metrics. This issue was mitigated when a previously optimized ReMM score was applied as a filtering cut-off (ReMM = 0.963), improving Genomiser's sensitivity (92.54% vs. 89.55%, top-15 candidates). We further evaluated the optimized parameter in a cohort of 778 negative cases and detected 20 non-coding variants (2.6% added yield), with 5 validated to be disease-causing. Our proposed approach adheres to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology and ClinGen variant interpretation guidelines to ensure interpretable results and integrates non-coding variant analysis into clinical pipelines.

罕见病患者的临床和数据驱动的基因组优化:来自香港基因组计划的经验。
Genomiser是一种表型驱动的工具,通过在罕见疾病诊断中的相关性对编码和非编码变异进行优先排序;然而,目前还缺乏对其在真实全基因组测序数据上表现的综合评价。香港基因组计划最初将Exomiser纳入诊断管道。本研究通过三个修改评估了从Exomiser升级到Genomiser的可行性:将区间过滤器扩展到转录本边界的±2000 bp,将次要等位基因频率(minor allele frequency, MAF)过滤器调整到3%,以及纳入SpliceAI。本研究共纳入985例已公开全基因组测序检测结果的患者,其中207例阳性(14例为非编码变异体)通过敏感性评价对Genomiser参数进行优化。在默认参数设置下,与Exomiser相比,Genomiser的灵敏度较低(70.15%对72.14%,前3名候选;74.63%对80.60%,前5名候选)。进一步的研究发现,这归因于受调节孟德尔突变(ReMM)评分指标影响的非编码变异噪声。当使用先前优化的ReMM评分作为过滤截止值(ReMM = 0.963)时,这个问题得到了缓解,提高了Genomiser的灵敏度(92.54%对89.55%,前15名候选)。我们在778例阴性病例的队列中进一步评估了优化后的参数,检测到20个非编码变异(增加产量2.6%),其中5个被证实是致病的。我们提出的方法遵循美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院/分子病理学协会和ClinGen变异解释指南,以确保可解释的结果,并将非编码变异分析整合到临床管道中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Briefings in bioinformatics
Briefings in bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
13.70%
发文量
549
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data. The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信