Verification of ideal screw size, trajectory, and shape for single and double endplate penetrating screw trajectories using osteoporotic vertebral body models based on the finite element method.

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Takumi Takeuchi, Kaito Jinnai, Yosuke Kawano, Kazumasa Konishi, Masahito Takahashi, Hitoshi Kono, Naobumi Hosogane
{"title":"Verification of ideal screw size, trajectory, and shape for single and double endplate penetrating screw trajectories using osteoporotic vertebral body models based on the finite element method.","authors":"Takumi Takeuchi, Kaito Jinnai, Yosuke Kawano, Kazumasa Konishi, Masahito Takahashi, Hitoshi Kono, Naobumi Hosogane","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a finite element study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify optimal trajectory, screw size, and screw shape using the finite element method.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis often develop spinal instability after fractures due to ankylosis and bone fragility. We developed single or double endplate penetrating screw trajectory (SEPST/DEPST) to improve fixation strength by penetrating the vertebral endplate. However, the optimal screw length, diameter, and shape remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Finite element models of T12 and L1 were constructed from computed tomography images of osteoporotic patients. Three analyses were conducted: (1) the impact of various screw diameters with DEPST, (2) a comparison of fixation strength between short DEPST (S-DEPST), which penetrates the posterolateral endplate, and conventional DEPST (C-DEPST), and (3) a comparison between conventional cancellous thread screws (CTS) and endplate screws (ETS). Pullout strength (POS) was measured in all analyses. Vertebral motion angle (VMA) of the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was measured in analyses (2) and (3), and the four-directional load test (4DLT) was performed in analysis (2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Larger screw diameters with DEPST correlated with elevated POS. S-DEPST demonstrated significantly better fixation strength with a POS 1.46 times higher than C-DEPST and 2.5 times higher than traditional trajectories. S-DEPST also demonstrated higher fixation in all directions in 4DLT. However, no significant difference was observed in the VMA of LIV. ETS demonstrated slightly higher fixation than CTS, but the difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fixation strength improved with larger screw diameters in DEPST. S-DEPST provided additional fixation due to rim penetration. ETS may offer a higher fixation strength and warrants further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: This is a finite element study.

Purpose: To identify optimal trajectory, screw size, and screw shape using the finite element method.

Overview of literature: Patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis often develop spinal instability after fractures due to ankylosis and bone fragility. We developed single or double endplate penetrating screw trajectory (SEPST/DEPST) to improve fixation strength by penetrating the vertebral endplate. However, the optimal screw length, diameter, and shape remain unclear.

Methods: Finite element models of T12 and L1 were constructed from computed tomography images of osteoporotic patients. Three analyses were conducted: (1) the impact of various screw diameters with DEPST, (2) a comparison of fixation strength between short DEPST (S-DEPST), which penetrates the posterolateral endplate, and conventional DEPST (C-DEPST), and (3) a comparison between conventional cancellous thread screws (CTS) and endplate screws (ETS). Pullout strength (POS) was measured in all analyses. Vertebral motion angle (VMA) of the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was measured in analyses (2) and (3), and the four-directional load test (4DLT) was performed in analysis (2).

Results: Larger screw diameters with DEPST correlated with elevated POS. S-DEPST demonstrated significantly better fixation strength with a POS 1.46 times higher than C-DEPST and 2.5 times higher than traditional trajectories. S-DEPST also demonstrated higher fixation in all directions in 4DLT. However, no significant difference was observed in the VMA of LIV. ETS demonstrated slightly higher fixation than CTS, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Fixation strength improved with larger screw diameters in DEPST. S-DEPST provided additional fixation due to rim penetration. ETS may offer a higher fixation strength and warrants further validation.

基于有限元方法的骨质疏松椎体模型验证单、双终板穿透螺钉理想尺寸、轨迹和形状。
研究设计:这是一项有限元研究。目的:利用有限元方法确定最佳轨迹、螺杆尺寸和螺杆形状。文献综述:弥漫性特发性骨骼肥厚症患者在骨折后常因强直和骨脆性而发生脊柱不稳定。我们开发了单或双终板穿透螺钉轨迹(SEPST/DEPST),通过穿透椎体终板来提高固定强度。然而,最佳的螺杆长度、直径和形状仍不清楚。方法:利用骨质疏松患者的ct图像建立T12和L1有限元模型。我们进行了三项分析:(1)不同直径的螺钉对DEPST的影响;(2)穿透后外侧终板的短型DEPST (S-DEPST)与常规DEPST (C-DEPST)的固定强度比较;(3)常规松质螺纹螺钉(CTS)与终板螺钉(ETS)的固定强度比较。所有分析均测量了拉出强度(POS)。在分析(2)和(3)中测量下置椎体(LIV)的椎体运动角(VMA),在分析(2)中进行四向负荷试验(4DLT)。结果:大直径的DEPST与较高的POS相关。S-DEPST显示出更好的固定强度,其POS比C-DEPST高1.46倍,比传统轨迹高2.5倍。S-DEPST在4DLT中也显示出更高的各方向固定。然而,在LIV的VMA中没有观察到显著差异。ETS比CTS表现出稍高的固定度,但差异无统计学意义。结论:大直径螺钉可提高DEPST的固定强度。S-DEPST为套管注入提供了额外的固定。ETS可能提供更高的固定强度,值得进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信