Pilar Alberola-Zorrilla, Ana Queralt, Maria Ángeles Pamblanco-Valero, Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga
{"title":"A new logistic regression model for the detection of chronic low back pain, based on a case-control study in the Spanish population.","authors":"Pilar Alberola-Zorrilla, Ana Queralt, Maria Ángeles Pamblanco-Valero, Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study comparing healthy individuals and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare detailed spinal motion and muscle activity patterns-recorded simultaneously using non-invasive methods-between chronic NSLBP patients and pain-free individuals, and to identify the most clinically useful variables for discriminating between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Motion analysis and electromyography (EMG) have been widely used to differentiate NSLBP patients from pain-free individuals. However, due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, the results have been inconsistent, limiting the clinical applicability of the findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three pain-free controls and 43 patients with chronic NSLBP were enrolled. Using non-invasive techniques, synchronized lumbar spine motion and erector spinae (ES) EMG activity were recorded during standardized trunk flexion-extension cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several variables differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression identified two variables with significant odds ratios for the presence of chronic NSLBP: time spent with the spine flexed beyond 90% of its maximum range (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99) and the ES relaxation ratio (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with and without chronic NSLBP exhibit distinct spinal motion and ES activity patterns during trunk flexionextension. These differences-specifically the time of maximum lumbar flexion and the relaxation ratio-can be objectively and easily measured. Their assessment may offer valuable clinical utility for the diagnosis and follow-up of NSLBP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Case-control study comparing healthy individuals and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).
Purpose: To compare detailed spinal motion and muscle activity patterns-recorded simultaneously using non-invasive methods-between chronic NSLBP patients and pain-free individuals, and to identify the most clinically useful variables for discriminating between the two groups.
Overview of literature: Motion analysis and electromyography (EMG) have been widely used to differentiate NSLBP patients from pain-free individuals. However, due to methodological heterogeneity across studies, the results have been inconsistent, limiting the clinical applicability of the findings.
Methods: Forty-three pain-free controls and 43 patients with chronic NSLBP were enrolled. Using non-invasive techniques, synchronized lumbar spine motion and erector spinae (ES) EMG activity were recorded during standardized trunk flexion-extension cycles.
Results: Several variables differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression identified two variables with significant odds ratios for the presence of chronic NSLBP: time spent with the spine flexed beyond 90% of its maximum range (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99) and the ES relaxation ratio (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13).
Conclusions: Individuals with and without chronic NSLBP exhibit distinct spinal motion and ES activity patterns during trunk flexionextension. These differences-specifically the time of maximum lumbar flexion and the relaxation ratio-can be objectively and easily measured. Their assessment may offer valuable clinical utility for the diagnosis and follow-up of NSLBP patients.