Outsmarting generic legislation: 4 years into the cat-and-mouse game of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist market since the Chinese ban in 2021.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Marie H Deventer, Christophe P Stove
{"title":"Outsmarting generic legislation: 4 years into the cat-and-mouse game of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist market since the Chinese ban in 2021.","authors":"Marie H Deventer, Christophe P Stove","doi":"10.1007/s00204-025-04191-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The enactment of the generic ban on synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) in China in 2021 has significantly altered the international SCRA landscape, both in size and diversity. To circumvent the new legislation, covering 7 common SCRA scaffolds, manufacturers have employed various ban-evading strategies during the past 4 years, yielding numerous novel compounds with distinct properties and challenges. These strategies include introducing alternative core moieties, such as a oxoindolins (\"OXIZIDs\"), an oxopyridone (CH-FUBBMPDORA) and a 4-methyl benzoate (NMDMSB), as well as replacing the carboxamide linker with an acetamide (e.g., seen in ADB-FUBIATA). Additional approaches involve modifying conventional core structures by switching tail group positions (e.g., pyrazoles 5F-3,5-AB-PFUPPYCA and 3,5-ADB-4en-PFUPPYCA), or removing/adding substitutions (e.g., tail-less SCRAs like ADB-INACA and brominated SCRAs like ADB-5'Br-BUTINACA, respectively). Furthermore, a concerning 'do-it-yourself' synthesis approach has emerged, enabling users or intermediate suppliers to easily generate banned, potent SCRAs themselves from ban-evading tail-less precursors, thereby obtaining renewed access to previously scheduled and potentially dangerous compounds. In addition to the proliferation of structurally novel, unknown substances, new ways to market readily existing (highly potent) SCRAs, continue to complicate analytical detection and risk assessment. This review explores the ban-evading strategies that have been observed between mid-2021 and mid-2025, along with a discussion on strategies for detection, identification, metabolic profiling, and pharmacological characterization of the SCRAs that have emerged as a result of this ban. Additionally, for some compounds that have not been pharmacologically characterized in literature, the first published data are presented here.</p>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-025-04191-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The enactment of the generic ban on synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) in China in 2021 has significantly altered the international SCRA landscape, both in size and diversity. To circumvent the new legislation, covering 7 common SCRA scaffolds, manufacturers have employed various ban-evading strategies during the past 4 years, yielding numerous novel compounds with distinct properties and challenges. These strategies include introducing alternative core moieties, such as a oxoindolins ("OXIZIDs"), an oxopyridone (CH-FUBBMPDORA) and a 4-methyl benzoate (NMDMSB), as well as replacing the carboxamide linker with an acetamide (e.g., seen in ADB-FUBIATA). Additional approaches involve modifying conventional core structures by switching tail group positions (e.g., pyrazoles 5F-3,5-AB-PFUPPYCA and 3,5-ADB-4en-PFUPPYCA), or removing/adding substitutions (e.g., tail-less SCRAs like ADB-INACA and brominated SCRAs like ADB-5'Br-BUTINACA, respectively). Furthermore, a concerning 'do-it-yourself' synthesis approach has emerged, enabling users or intermediate suppliers to easily generate banned, potent SCRAs themselves from ban-evading tail-less precursors, thereby obtaining renewed access to previously scheduled and potentially dangerous compounds. In addition to the proliferation of structurally novel, unknown substances, new ways to market readily existing (highly potent) SCRAs, continue to complicate analytical detection and risk assessment. This review explores the ban-evading strategies that have been observed between mid-2021 and mid-2025, along with a discussion on strategies for detection, identification, metabolic profiling, and pharmacological characterization of the SCRAs that have emerged as a result of this ban. Additionally, for some compounds that have not been pharmacologically characterized in literature, the first published data are presented here.

战胜仿制药立法:自2021年中国颁布禁令以来,合成大麻素受体激动剂市场的猫捉老鼠游戏已经持续了4年。
中国于2021年颁布的合成大麻素受体激动剂(SCRA)通用禁令,在规模和多样性方面显著改变了国际SCRA格局。为了规避涵盖7种常见SCRA支架的新法规,制造商在过去4年中采用了各种规避禁令的策略,生产出许多具有不同性能和挑战的新化合物。这些策略包括引入替代核心部分,如氧吲哚(OXIZIDs)、氧吡啶酮(CH-FUBBMPDORA)和4-甲基苯甲酸酯(NMDMSB),以及用乙酰胺取代carboxamide连接体(例如在ADB-FUBIATA中看到的)。其他方法包括通过改变尾基位置来修饰传统的核心结构(例如,吡唑5f -3,5- ab - pfuppyca和3,5- adb -4en- pfuppyca),或去除/添加取代(例如,无尾SCRAs如ADB-INACA和溴化SCRAs如ADB-5'Br-BUTINACA)。此外,一种令人担忧的“自己做”合成方法已经出现,使用户或中间供应商能够很容易地从规避禁令的无尾前体中自己产生被禁用的强效scra,从而重新获得先前列入计划和潜在危险的化合物。除了结构新颖、未知物质的扩散外,现有(高效)scra的新销售方式继续使分析检测和风险评估复杂化。这篇综述探讨了在2021年中期到2025年中期之间观察到的禁令规避策略,同时讨论了由于禁令而出现的scra的检测、鉴定、代谢分析和药理学表征策略。此外,对于一些尚未在文献中进行药理学表征的化合物,本文提供了首次发表的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Toxicology
Archives of Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信