Return to work rate and long-term effectiveness of delayed versus early surgery for back pain and sciatica in Russian Railways employees: a single-center retrospective study.
Vadim Byvaltsev, Andrei Kalinin, Yurii Pestryakov, Elmira Satardinova, Ravshan Yuldashev, Marat Aliyev, Yermek Dyussembekov, Andrei Shcherbatykh, K Daniel Riew
{"title":"Return to work rate and long-term effectiveness of delayed versus early surgery for back pain and sciatica in Russian Railways employees: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Vadim Byvaltsev, Andrei Kalinin, Yurii Pestryakov, Elmira Satardinova, Ravshan Yuldashev, Marat Aliyev, Yermek Dyussembekov, Andrei Shcherbatykh, K Daniel Riew","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the return-to-work rate and long-term outcomes of delayed versus early surgery for back pain and sciatica among railway workers.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>The timing of conservative versus surgical treatment and their long-term clinical effectiveness remain controversial. To our knowledge, there are no studies on the long-term postoperative outcomes and risk factors for unsatisfactory long-term clinical outcomes after conservative and surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in railway workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients with persistent back pain and sciatica due to lumbar degeneration at L4-L5 or L5-S1 treated between 2010 and 2020. Two groups of patients were identified: The Delayed group (n=692) initially refused operative care despite 6-12 weeks of non-operative care, and the Early group (n=1,687) underwent surgery immediately after routine (6-12 weeks) non-operative care was unsuccessful. Perioperative clinical data and return-to-work rates were obtained before surgery and at a minimum of 40 months postoperatively. Factors associated with unfavorable outcomes were also identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the two groups had comparable clinical data, demographics, and workload intensity. There were significantly better clinical results, fewer complications, and a higher frequency of return to work in the Early group than in the Delayed group (p<0.05); 15.3% (209) and 25.7% (147) of the patients in the Early and Delayed groups, respectively, had unsatisfactory long-term clinical outcomes. Specific factors associated with unsatisfactory long-term clinical outcomes in the delayed surgery group were male sex, diabetes mellitus, lower extremity pain Visual Analog Scale >40 mm, Oswestry Disability Index >48%, physical component score <18 points, preoperative use of narcotic analgesics, and light-to-medium and heavy-to-very heavy preoperative workload.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-center study involving railway workers with lumbar degenerative back pain and sciatica, early surgery was superior to delayed surgery in terms of pain intensity, functional status, quality of life, return-to-work rate, and reoperation rate at the long-term follow-up. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to clarify this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective study.
Purpose: To evaluate the return-to-work rate and long-term outcomes of delayed versus early surgery for back pain and sciatica among railway workers.
Overview of literature: The timing of conservative versus surgical treatment and their long-term clinical effectiveness remain controversial. To our knowledge, there are no studies on the long-term postoperative outcomes and risk factors for unsatisfactory long-term clinical outcomes after conservative and surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in railway workers.
Methods: We identified patients with persistent back pain and sciatica due to lumbar degeneration at L4-L5 or L5-S1 treated between 2010 and 2020. Two groups of patients were identified: The Delayed group (n=692) initially refused operative care despite 6-12 weeks of non-operative care, and the Early group (n=1,687) underwent surgery immediately after routine (6-12 weeks) non-operative care was unsuccessful. Perioperative clinical data and return-to-work rates were obtained before surgery and at a minimum of 40 months postoperatively. Factors associated with unfavorable outcomes were also identified.
Results: At baseline, the two groups had comparable clinical data, demographics, and workload intensity. There were significantly better clinical results, fewer complications, and a higher frequency of return to work in the Early group than in the Delayed group (p<0.05); 15.3% (209) and 25.7% (147) of the patients in the Early and Delayed groups, respectively, had unsatisfactory long-term clinical outcomes. Specific factors associated with unsatisfactory long-term clinical outcomes in the delayed surgery group were male sex, diabetes mellitus, lower extremity pain Visual Analog Scale >40 mm, Oswestry Disability Index >48%, physical component score <18 points, preoperative use of narcotic analgesics, and light-to-medium and heavy-to-very heavy preoperative workload.
Conclusions: In this single-center study involving railway workers with lumbar degenerative back pain and sciatica, early surgery was superior to delayed surgery in terms of pain intensity, functional status, quality of life, return-to-work rate, and reoperation rate at the long-term follow-up. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to clarify this association.