Artificial intelligence agent in clinical trial operations: a fictional (for now) case study

Timothé Ménard, Katrina A Bramstedt
{"title":"Artificial intelligence agent in clinical trial operations: a fictional (for now) case study","authors":"Timothé Ménard,&nbsp;Katrina A Bramstedt","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00798-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>AI agents are autonomous systems that catalyze drug development by processing vast data sets, modeling drug interactions, and optimizing synthesis protocols. Though not yet used in clinical trial operations, these agents could potentially manage data in electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs), identifying anomalies, addressing basic issues, and creating reports—tasks that usually demand extensive human effort. Deploying AI agents in clinical trials could raise ethical concerns regarding autonomy, data privacy, bias, transparency, and accountability. Using a fictional use case, and building on ethical frameworks for biomedical research and on the Roche Data and AI Ethics Principles, the use of AI agents in clinical trials aims to balance efficiency with participant safety and rights, potentially hastening clinical research and the eventual approval of new treatments that could benefit patients and society while ensuring ethical integrity. This commentary explores ethical guardrails and risk mitigations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"4627 - 4633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00798-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI agents are autonomous systems that catalyze drug development by processing vast data sets, modeling drug interactions, and optimizing synthesis protocols. Though not yet used in clinical trial operations, these agents could potentially manage data in electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs), identifying anomalies, addressing basic issues, and creating reports—tasks that usually demand extensive human effort. Deploying AI agents in clinical trials could raise ethical concerns regarding autonomy, data privacy, bias, transparency, and accountability. Using a fictional use case, and building on ethical frameworks for biomedical research and on the Roche Data and AI Ethics Principles, the use of AI agents in clinical trials aims to balance efficiency with participant safety and rights, potentially hastening clinical research and the eventual approval of new treatments that could benefit patients and society while ensuring ethical integrity. This commentary explores ethical guardrails and risk mitigations.

临床试验操作中的人工智能代理:一个虚构的(目前的)案例研究
人工智能代理是一种自主系统,通过处理大量数据集、模拟药物相互作用和优化合成方案来催化药物开发。虽然尚未用于临床试验操作,但这些代理可能会管理电子病例报告表(ecrf)中的数据,识别异常情况,解决基本问题,并创建报告——这些任务通常需要大量的人力。在临床试验中部署人工智能代理可能会引发对自主性、数据隐私、偏见、透明度和问责制的伦理担忧。通过一个虚构的用例,并以生物医学研究的伦理框架以及罗氏数据和人工智能伦理原则为基础,在临床试验中使用人工智能药物旨在平衡效率与参与者的安全和权利,从而可能加速临床研究,并最终批准有利于患者和社会的新疗法,同时确保道德诚信。这篇评论探讨了道德护栏和风险缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信