Predicting fire incidents with ML: an XAI approach

Donghyeok Lee, Fernando Perez Tellez, Rajesh Jaiswal
{"title":"Predicting fire incidents with ML: an XAI approach","authors":"Donghyeok Lee,&nbsp;Fernando Perez Tellez,&nbsp;Rajesh Jaiswal","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00683-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With increasing urbanization and industrial activities in Dublin city, there is a growing interest in natural disasters and accidents. In this research, we compared the regression performances for the number of fire incidents in Dublin with seven different machine learning models. We evaluated how each model performs with metrics like Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and R-Squared scores. Among the used models which are Prophet, Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Simple Linear Regression, Polynomial Regression, Support Vector Regression, Decision Tree Regression, and Random Forest Regression, the most precise model was the Prophet with the highest R-Squared score of 0.91 because it effectively captures the underlying trend, seasonality and holiday effects. This research also aims not only to establish the superior model but also to give clear and understandable reasons for these predictions using explainable AI (XAI). In particular, the trust in Prophet is enhanced by global explanation and local explanation for users to believe in the decision-making processes in the model. It enabled us to enhance the interpretability and transparency of the Prophet, which is aligning with ethical AI (Artificial Intelligence).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"4429 - 4439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00683-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00683-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increasing urbanization and industrial activities in Dublin city, there is a growing interest in natural disasters and accidents. In this research, we compared the regression performances for the number of fire incidents in Dublin with seven different machine learning models. We evaluated how each model performs with metrics like Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and R-Squared scores. Among the used models which are Prophet, Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Simple Linear Regression, Polynomial Regression, Support Vector Regression, Decision Tree Regression, and Random Forest Regression, the most precise model was the Prophet with the highest R-Squared score of 0.91 because it effectively captures the underlying trend, seasonality and holiday effects. This research also aims not only to establish the superior model but also to give clear and understandable reasons for these predictions using explainable AI (XAI). In particular, the trust in Prophet is enhanced by global explanation and local explanation for users to believe in the decision-making processes in the model. It enabled us to enhance the interpretability and transparency of the Prophet, which is aligning with ethical AI (Artificial Intelligence).

用ML预测火灾事件:一种XAI方法
随着都柏林市城市化和工业活动的增加,人们对自然灾害和事故的兴趣越来越大。在这项研究中,我们用七种不同的机器学习模型比较了都柏林火灾事件数量的回归性能。我们用均方误差(MSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和r平方分数等指标评估了每个模型的表现。使用的模型有Prophet、自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)、简单线性回归、多项式回归、支持向量回归、决策树回归和随机森林回归,其中最精确的模型是Prophet, r平方得分最高,为0.91,因为它有效地捕捉了潜在的趋势、季节性和假日效应。本研究不仅旨在建立更优的模型,而且还旨在使用可解释的AI (XAI)给出这些预测的清晰易懂的原因。特别是通过全局解释和局部解释增强了用户对模型中决策过程的信任。它使我们能够提高先知的可解释性和透明度,这与道德AI(人工智能)一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信