The dual edge of AI: advancing and endangering scientific integrity in chemistry

Erdal Yabalak
{"title":"The dual edge of AI: advancing and endangering scientific integrity in chemistry","authors":"Erdal Yabalak","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00829-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into environmental and analytical chemistry presents both transformative opportunities and serious risks to scientific integrity. AI offers increasingly advanced capabilities in data interpretation, process automation, and predictive modeling, while its uncritical use—particularly in generating scientific texts—raises concerns about bias, error propagation, and ethical accountability. This article is a conceptual and critical analysis, not an experimental report. It critically examines the dual impact of AI on scientific research, highlighting potential threats to rigor, transparency, and authorship. The article also discusses the transformative benefits of AI in enhancing analytical efficiency, real-time monitoring, and predictive modeling in chemical research. The article emphasizes the need for robust oversight, ethical frameworks, and the preservation of human expertise in AI-assisted studies. By exploring AI-generated outputs and evaluating their implications through expert critique, this work aims to foster responsible and informed integration of AI in chemistry. Recommendations are provided for researchers, editors, and institutions to safeguard the credibility and trustworthiness of scientific communication in the era of AI.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"4635 - 4643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00829-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into environmental and analytical chemistry presents both transformative opportunities and serious risks to scientific integrity. AI offers increasingly advanced capabilities in data interpretation, process automation, and predictive modeling, while its uncritical use—particularly in generating scientific texts—raises concerns about bias, error propagation, and ethical accountability. This article is a conceptual and critical analysis, not an experimental report. It critically examines the dual impact of AI on scientific research, highlighting potential threats to rigor, transparency, and authorship. The article also discusses the transformative benefits of AI in enhancing analytical efficiency, real-time monitoring, and predictive modeling in chemical research. The article emphasizes the need for robust oversight, ethical frameworks, and the preservation of human expertise in AI-assisted studies. By exploring AI-generated outputs and evaluating their implications through expert critique, this work aims to foster responsible and informed integration of AI in chemistry. Recommendations are provided for researchers, editors, and institutions to safeguard the credibility and trustworthiness of scientific communication in the era of AI.

Graphical abstract

人工智能的双刃剑:推进和危害化学的科学完整性
将人工智能(AI)整合到环境和分析化学中,既带来了变革机遇,也给科学诚信带来了严重风险。人工智能在数据解释、过程自动化和预测建模方面提供了越来越先进的能力,但它的不加批判的使用——特别是在生成科学文本方面——引发了对偏见、错误传播和道德责任的担忧。这篇文章是一个概念性和批判性的分析,而不是一个实验报告。它批判性地审视了人工智能对科学研究的双重影响,强调了对严谨性、透明度和作者身份的潜在威胁。本文还讨论了人工智能在提高化学研究的分析效率、实时监测和预测建模方面的变革性好处。这篇文章强调了在人工智能辅助研究中需要强有力的监督、道德框架和保留人类专业知识。通过探索人工智能生成的输出并通过专家批评评估其影响,本工作旨在促进人工智能在化学中的负责任和明智的整合。为研究者、编辑和机构提供建议,以维护人工智能时代科学传播的可信度和可信赖性。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信