AIgemony: power dynamics, dominant narratives, and colonisation

Nasser Bahrami
{"title":"AIgemony: power dynamics, dominant narratives, and colonisation","authors":"Nasser Bahrami","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00734-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aims to highlight the potential challenges posed by the unmeasured applications of AI, particularly in fostering less-recognised forms of ‘hegemony’—understood as facilitated by AI’s development, rather than caused by it. Skyrocketing advancements demand appropriate preparedness to handle the consequences of significant transformations. Nevertheless, inadequate public awareness, combined with regulatory and legal framework lags, and the exploitation of such vulnerability by influential actors, could intensify inequalities to unprecedented levels. Founded on design and broader social science approaches, this research introduces the concept of <i>AI</i>gemony. It elucidates how specific circumstances may equip certain individuals with persuasion catalysts in the form of ‘dominant narratives’. Notably, as a broader foundation, this form of hegemony could reshape or even transcend traditional systems of power relations such as colonialism, class relations, racism, and sexism. Yet, <i>AI</i>gemony differs from traditional hegemony in crucial respects, specifically in that it is internally unstable, and does not automatically function to the benefit of the ruling elite. A collaborative method is outlined for systematically evaluating these emergent imbalances and positively reconstructing power dynamics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"5081 - 5103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00734-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00734-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to highlight the potential challenges posed by the unmeasured applications of AI, particularly in fostering less-recognised forms of ‘hegemony’—understood as facilitated by AI’s development, rather than caused by it. Skyrocketing advancements demand appropriate preparedness to handle the consequences of significant transformations. Nevertheless, inadequate public awareness, combined with regulatory and legal framework lags, and the exploitation of such vulnerability by influential actors, could intensify inequalities to unprecedented levels. Founded on design and broader social science approaches, this research introduces the concept of AIgemony. It elucidates how specific circumstances may equip certain individuals with persuasion catalysts in the form of ‘dominant narratives’. Notably, as a broader foundation, this form of hegemony could reshape or even transcend traditional systems of power relations such as colonialism, class relations, racism, and sexism. Yet, AIgemony differs from traditional hegemony in crucial respects, specifically in that it is internally unstable, and does not automatically function to the benefit of the ruling elite. A collaborative method is outlined for systematically evaluating these emergent imbalances and positively reconstructing power dynamics.

igemony:权力动力学,主导叙事和殖民化
本文旨在强调人工智能未衡量的应用所带来的潜在挑战,特别是在培育不太被认可的“霸权”形式方面——被理解为由人工智能的发展促进,而不是由它引起的。飞速发展需要适当的准备来处理重大转变的后果。然而,公众认识不足,加上监管和法律框架滞后,以及有影响力的行为者利用这种脆弱性,可能使不平等加剧到前所未有的程度。本研究以设计和更广泛的社会科学方法为基础,引入了igemony的概念。它阐明了特定环境如何以“主导叙事”的形式为某些个体提供说服催化剂。值得注意的是,作为一个更广泛的基础,这种霸权形式可以重塑甚至超越殖民主义、阶级关系、种族主义和性别歧视等传统的权力关系体系。然而,霸权在一些关键方面与传统霸权不同,特别是它内部不稳定,不会自动为统治精英的利益服务。本文概述了一种协作方法,用于系统地评估这些新兴的不平衡,并积极地重建权力动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信