Eu regulatory ecosystem for ethical AI

Vaios Bolgouras, Apostolis Zarras, Christian Leka, Ioannis Stylianou, Aristeidis Farao, Christos Xenakis
{"title":"Eu regulatory ecosystem for ethical AI","authors":"Vaios Bolgouras,&nbsp;Apostolis Zarras,&nbsp;Christian Leka,&nbsp;Ioannis Stylianou,&nbsp;Aristeidis Farao,&nbsp;Christos Xenakis","doi":"10.1007/s43681-025-00749-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>AI applications raise complex ethical, legal, and security challenges that demand comprehensive and coordinated governance at multiple levels. In this paper, we examine how key European Union (EU) regulatory frameworks, such as the AI Act, GDPR, and NIS2, interact to set standards for AI security, functionality, and ethical performance. By comparing the objectives and requirements outlined in these regulatory instruments, we identify points of convergence that encourage a holistic approach to creating transparent, accountable, and fair AI systems. This alignment is pivotal for building user trust and mitigating risks associated with data breaches, algorithmic bias, and privacy violations. Moreover, we explore how harmonizing these regulations can maintain the EU’s competitive edge in AI innovation, as clear governance structures help businesses remain agile while protecting consumer interests. Our analysis further addresses the ramifications for global AI governance, emphasizing the significance of a unified, forward-looking strategy to ensure responsible AI development. In doing so, we recommend future harmonization initiatives that promote societal well-being, safeguard human rights, and uphold ethical and technological standards worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 5","pages":"5063 - 5080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-025-00749-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-025-00749-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI applications raise complex ethical, legal, and security challenges that demand comprehensive and coordinated governance at multiple levels. In this paper, we examine how key European Union (EU) regulatory frameworks, such as the AI Act, GDPR, and NIS2, interact to set standards for AI security, functionality, and ethical performance. By comparing the objectives and requirements outlined in these regulatory instruments, we identify points of convergence that encourage a holistic approach to creating transparent, accountable, and fair AI systems. This alignment is pivotal for building user trust and mitigating risks associated with data breaches, algorithmic bias, and privacy violations. Moreover, we explore how harmonizing these regulations can maintain the EU’s competitive edge in AI innovation, as clear governance structures help businesses remain agile while protecting consumer interests. Our analysis further addresses the ramifications for global AI governance, emphasizing the significance of a unified, forward-looking strategy to ensure responsible AI development. In doing so, we recommend future harmonization initiatives that promote societal well-being, safeguard human rights, and uphold ethical and technological standards worldwide.

欧盟人工智能伦理监管生态系统
人工智能应用带来了复杂的伦理、法律和安全挑战,需要在多个层面进行全面和协调的治理。在本文中,我们研究了欧盟(EU)的关键监管框架,如人工智能法案、GDPR和NIS2,如何相互作用,以设定人工智能安全、功能和道德绩效的标准。通过比较这些监管工具中概述的目标和要求,我们确定了鼓励采用整体方法创建透明、负责任和公平的人工智能系统的趋同点。这种一致性对于建立用户信任和减轻与数据泄露、算法偏见和隐私侵犯相关的风险至关重要。此外,我们探讨了如何协调这些法规,以保持欧盟在人工智能创新方面的竞争优势,因为明确的治理结构有助于企业保持敏捷,同时保护消费者利益。我们的分析进一步阐述了对全球人工智能治理的影响,强调了统一的前瞻性战略对确保负责任的人工智能发展的重要性。在此过程中,我们建议未来采取协调行动,促进社会福祉,保障人权,维护全球道德和技术标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信